Abstract
Risk-based business licensing is licensing administered by OSS institutions, where business actors to obtain permits must go through the OSS platform, in practice there is a notary who handles business licensing. So this research discusses first, what is the role and authority of a notary in arranging business permits through OSS? Second, is the notary responsible for arranging business permits by a notary through OSS which causes losses to business actors? The type of research used is normative legal research using conceptual and statutory approaches. The results of this research conclude firstly that the authority of a notary as a public official is to make authentic deeds for all deeds, agreements, and decrees as intended in Article 15 of the Law on the Position of Notaries. Meanwhile, the authority of notaries in arranging risk-based business permits through OSS must be based on the granting of power of attorney. Second, the notary's responsibility in arranging business permits through OSS to business actors who experience losses must be proven beforehand. If the loss in processing business permits is caused by a deed made, the notary must be held accountable for carrying out his duties in terms of making authentic deeds if he violates the provisions as intended in UUJN. However, if the sanctions imposed result in losses due to the implementation of business licensing, the notary cannot be held responsible.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.