Abstract
Notaries are responsible for authentic deeds which result in null and void at the end of their term of office. The need for limitations in the matter of the Notary's responsibility is because in civil law there are restrictions on prosecution. Article 1967 of the Civil Code explains that claims in civil law will be deleted after the 30-year time limit has passed. In this case, it creates uncertainty in terms of legal protection for the Notary as a Public Official after the end of his term of office and there is a blurring of norms in terms of determining the expiration time limit of the Notary's responsibility for the agreement he made in terms of Article 65 UUJN-P. There is a legal issue that is studied in this study, namely how the provisions on the expiration date of the Notary's accountability for the Notary deed he made. The author's purpose of doing this research is to identify and to analyze the expiration provisions in the Notary's responsibility for the notarial deed they made. The research method used is normative legal research, using a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach. The conclusion in this study is that UUJN does not regulate expiration, which means the Notary's lifelong responsibility regarding warkah, minutes of deed, and others. The difference between the 30 year expiration is completed with the Notary's accountability. The notary is responsible for being able to prove the truth of the deed in court when asked for information
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.