Abstract

The Hadwiger–Debrunner number HDd(p,q) is the minimal size of a piercing set that can always be guaranteed for a family of compact convex sets in Rd that satisfies the (p,q) property. Hadwiger and Debrunner showed that HDd(p,q)≥p−q+1 for all q, and equality is attained for q>d−1dp+1. Almost tight upper bounds for HDd(p,q) for a ‘sufficiently large’ q were obtained recently using an enhancement of the celebrated Alon–Kleitman theorem, but no sharp upper bounds for a general q are known.In [9], Montejano and Soberón defined a refinement of the (p,q) property: F satisfies the (p,q)r property if among any p elements of F, at least r of the q-tuples intersect. They showed that HDd(p,q)r≤p−q+1 holds for all r>(pq)−(p−d+1q−d+1); however, this is far from being tight.In this paper we present improved asymptotic upper bounds on HDd(p,q)r which hold when only a tiny portion of the q-tuples intersect. In particular, we show that for p,q sufficiently large, HDd(p,q)r≤p−q+1 holds with r=p−q/2d⋅(pq). Our bound misses the known lower bound for the same piercing number by a factor of less than pqd.Our results use Kalai's Upper Bound Theorem for convex sets, along with the Hadwiger–Debrunner theorem and the recent improved upper bound on HDd(p,q) mentioned above.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.