Abstract
In motor adaptation, learning is thought to rely on a combination of several processes. Two of these are implicit learning (incidental updating of the movement due to sensory prediction error) and explicit learning (intentional adjustment to reduce target error). The explicit component is thought to be fast adapting, while the implicit one is slow. The dynamic integration of such a fast and a slow components can lead to spontaneous recovery. That is, after prolonged adaptation of movement to a given perturbation, the learning is extinguished by presenting a perturbation in the opposite direction for a few trials. After such extinction, the learned adaptation can reappear in the absence of any further training, a phenomenon called spontaneous recovery. Trewartha et al. (2014) found that older adults show less spontaneous recovery than their younger controls, indicating impairments in short-term retention of force-field adaptation. This disagrees with evidence suggesting that the implicit component and its retention do not decline with aging. To clarify this discrepancy, we performed a conceptual replication of that result. Twenty-eight healthy young and 20 healthy older adults learned to adapt to a forcefield perturbation in a paradigm known to elicit spontaneous recovery. Both groups adapted equally well to the perturbation. Implicit adaptation of the older subjects was indistinguishable from that of their younger counterparts. In addition, our conceptual replication failed to reproduce the result of Trewartha et al. (2014) and found that the spontaneous recovery was also similar across groups. Our results reconcile previous studies by showing that both spontaneous recovery and implicit adaptation are unaffected by aging.
Submitted Version
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have