Abstract
Saccades can either be elicited automatically by salient peripheral stimuli or can additionally depend on explicit cognitive goals. Similarly, it is thought that motor adaptation is driven by the combination of a more automatic, implicit process and a more explicit, cognitive process. However, the degree to which such implicit and explicit learning contribute to the adaptation of more reactive and voluntary saccades remains elusive. To study this question, we employed a global saccadic adaptation paradigm with both increasing and decreasing saccade amplitudes. We assessed the resulting adaptation using a dual state model of motor adaptation. This model decomposes learning into a fast and slow process, which are thought to constitute explicit and implicit learning, respectively. Our results show that adaptation of reactive saccades is equally driven by fast and slow learning, while fast learning is nearly absent when adapting voluntary (i.e. scanning) saccades. This pattern of results was present both when saccade gain was increased or decreased. Our results suggest that the increased cognitive demands associated with voluntary compared to reactive saccade planning interfere specifically with explicit learning.
Highlights
Successful interaction with the environment requires that motor actions precisely reach their intended targets
In correspondence with the literature, it shows stronger gain-down compared to gain-up adaptation [34,35,36,37]. It shows that adaptation of scanning and reactive saccades is of comparable magnitude
It suggests that reactive saccade adaptation reaches maximal adaptation early in the block, whereas scanning saccade adaptation continues more strongly throughout the block
Summary
Successful interaction with the environment requires that motor actions precisely reach their intended targets. This poses a challenging problem to the organism as conditions both within the body (e.g. waning or gaining of strength) and in the outside world (e.g. wind direction) are in constant flux. The problem is solved by ongoing calibration processes, referred to as motor adaptation. When saccades depend on behavioral goals they are relatively slow and often termed voluntary [3].
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have