Abstract

This critical literature review begins by giving a short introduction to the microfinance industry. Microfinance institutions (MFIs) are explained and an account is given of their dual performance goals of financial performance (‘financial sustainability’) and social performance (‘outreach’). While MFIs’ social performance is directly aimed at poverty reduction, it is noteworthy that often they fail to address poverty (i.e., they fail to deliver outreach). The aim of the paper is to answer the following research question: Why have microfinance institutions (MFIs) failed to address poverty? In order to establish the reason, the first step is to look at how the MFIs are managed and controlled, i.e. to examine MFIs’ corporate governance literature. This critical literature review was conducted using systematic on-line searches in the databases Scopus and Web of Knowledge; the main key words used were microfinance, gender, corporate governance and performance. The unconvincing nature of the findings of a review of the corporate governance literature suggests that another factor should be taken into consideration: that of gender; after all, MFIs are mainly used by women. The findings from reviewing the microfinance literature suggests that microfinance gender literature may explain why MFIs have not adequately addressed poverty, but this literature consists of a few studies only and further studies are needed. The literature on gender in general is more substantial, however. Some account of it will be given in this literature review. The findings of this literature review should benefit policymakers on the one hand, who are in a position to advance gender equality, while on the other hand it should be of use to academics, who can research MFIs in relation to gender; further studies of gender in MFIs are encouraged.

Highlights

  • The aim of this paper is to answer the following research question: Why have microfinance institutions (MFIs) failed to address poverty? The paper begins with a description of the microfinance industry

  • The findings from reviewing the microfinance literature suggest that microfinance gender literature may explain why Microfinance institutions (MFIs) have not adequately addressed poverty

  • MFIs are different from most other organizations since they are intended both to provide financial performance and social performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this paper is to answer the following research question: Why have microfinance institutions (MFIs) failed to address poverty? An account will be given of MFIs’ dual performance goals of providing good social performance (here called ‘outreach’) and sufficient financial performance, (here called ‘financial sustainability’; Armendáriz and Morduch, 2007). The findings from reviewing the microfinance literature suggest that microfinance gender literature may explain why MFIs have not adequately addressed poverty. The literature of gender in general is more substantial Some account of it will be given in this review. Microfinance institutions (MFIs) will be defined, with an account of their history and the current situation of the microfinance industry and its dual goals. A short review of the literature on gender in general precedes the conclusion

The microfinance industry: institutions and goals
Research method
The microfinance industry’s inconsistent performance solved by women
Findings
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call