Abstract

In this paper we examine capital income taxation of a reference dependent sufficiently loss averse investor in a two period portfolio choice model under full loss offset provisions. Capital income taxation with loss offset provisions has been found to stimulate risk taking in expected utility models under certain assumptions about attitudes towards risk but would such effect be found under prospect theory type of preferences? We observe that the impact of capital income taxation depends on investors’ reference levels relative to their endowment income and thus we explore capital income taxation for different types of loss averse investors in terms of their ambition. We consider the less ambitious investors to be the ones with relatively low reference levels (they avoid relative losses in both periods) and more ambitious investors to be those with relatively high reference levels. We analyze two types of more ambitious investors: investors with higher time preference (who experience relative losses only in the second period under the bad state of nature) and investors with lower time preference (who experience relative losses only in the first period). We observe that capital income taxation stimulates current consumption in most cases which encourages risk taking, although the final outcome would depend on the investors’ degree of risk aversion, the rate of time preference and the tax rate in relation to certain thresholds. Current consumption could be discouraged for some ambitious type of investors that have relatively high second period reference levels but not necessary first period reference levels. In summary, to determine the impact of capital income taxation on the decision variables the reference levels in relation to endowment income play the most significant role. Ignoring reference depended preferences can lead to different conclusions for investors reaction to capital income taxation. We also find certain type of investors whose happiness level increases with capital income taxation under full loss offset provisions.

Highlights

  • O entendimento da teoria do Crime de Colarinho Branco, de Sutherland (1940), e, posteriormente, a do Triângulo da Fraude, de Cressey (1950), são consequências da racionalidade do pensamento positivista de Augusto Comte e Émile Durkheim

  • Se quisermos entender em que consiste essencialmente o crime, segundo Durkheim (1893), será necessário pôr em evidência as características que se revelam idênticas em todas as variedades criminológicas dos diferentes tipos sociais

  • O Statement of Auditing Standards (SAS) 99, do Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), também utiliza os elementos do Triângulo da Fraude como guia para entendimento do fenômeno das fraudes pelos auditores

Read more

Summary

Introdução

O entendimento da teoria do Crime de Colarinho Branco, de Sutherland (1940), e, posteriormente, a do Triângulo da Fraude, de Cressey (1950), são consequências da racionalidade do pensamento positivista de Augusto Comte e Émile Durkheim. Fruto do pensamento positivista, guiou Sutherland (1940) na identificação que os crimes de colarinho branco tinham como características comuns uma pessoa de respeitabilidade e da alta classe social. Dessa forma, o primeiro objetivo buscou explicar o fenômeno da fraude pela construção de um mapa conceitual a partir da revisão de literatura (literature review), uma vez que sua origem não vem da Ciência Contábil. Este trabalho contribui para a área acadêmica de pesquisa em governança e finanças corporativas e para microestrutura, direito e uma série de campos interdisciplinares relacionados (Ball, 2009; Cumming, Dannhauser & Johan, 2015), ou seja, é importante obter conhecimento de outras disciplinas e fundir com a Ciência Contábil. Também, para as pesquisas de prevenção e detecção da fraude, pelo entendimento dos motivos que levam indivíduos a tais atos criminosos ou desvios de conduta. Segundo Trompeter et al (2012), o entendimento do Triângulo da Fraude pode ajudar os auditores a projetar testes para detectá-las

Origem do Triângulo da Fraude
Elementos do Triângulo da Fraude
Motivação
Oportunidade
Tipos de Fraudes
Procedimentos Metodológicos
Autores Profícuos
Revistas Relevantes
Teorias de base
Paradigmas de Pesquisa
Considerações Finais e Oportunidades de Pesquisas
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.