Abstract
Background: The choice of prosthetic restoration for missing teeth significantly impacts long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction. Implant-supported prostheses have gained popularity due to their potential advantages over conventional fixed and removable prostheses. Objective: This study aims to investigate the long-term success rates and patient satisfaction associated with implant-supported prosthetic restorations compared to conventional fixed and removable prostheses. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted with a sample of 45 patients, divided equally among three treatment groups: implant-supported prostheses, conventional fixed prostheses, and removable prostheses. Data were collected from patient records, clinical evaluations, and follow-up appointments. Key metrics included survival rates, complications, patient satisfaction (assessed using a standardized questionnaire), and functional outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, Chi-square tests, and analysis of variance. Results: Implant-supported prostheses demonstrated the highest survival rate (93.3%) compared to conventional fixed (80.0%) and removable prostheses (66.7%). Patient satisfaction scores for comfort, esthetics, and overall satisfaction were significantly higher for implant-supported prostheses (8.7 ± 1.2, 9.0 ± 1.0, 8.9 ± 1.1, respectively) than for conventional fixed (7.5 ± 1.5, 7.8 ± 1.4, 7.6 ± 1.3) and removable prostheses (6.8 ± 1.7, 6.5 ± 1.6, 6.7 ± 1.5). Conclusion: Implant-supported prostheses exhibit superior long-term survival rates and higher patient satisfaction compared to conventional fixed and removable prostheses. These findings support the use of implant-supported restorations as a preferred option for long-term dental prosthetics.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call