Abstract
During the last century, in social and humanistic sciences, the dominant perspective on space was the political economy, focusing on how space relates to macro-social phenomena and minimizing the role of the micro-social ones, by conceptualizing space as a social force, constraining social actions. Despite sporadic attempts to theorize how people could escape the dominance of power by investing spaces with subjective meanings, appropriating spaces through body practices, or anchoring memories and identities into specific spaces, there is still a need to understand how spaces are lived and how daily life spatial contexts become micro-foundations for social actions. I conduct an interpretive synthesis to show how social scientists borrowed ideas from philosophers to understand the phenomenology of everyday life by capturing the experience of urban, residential, and domestic space. I explore space through phenomenological lenses to clarify concepts as: the constitution of space through perception, the sensorial and emotional experience of space and the atmosphere of a specific place, the sense of space, the meaning of feeling at home and being intimate with a particular place, the practice of home as a body extension. To nuance these ideas, I use results from four research projects I participated in: Couple living space in Brasov metropolitan area; Hidden faces of homelessness - Measuring homelessness in Europe; Inhabiting urban places and experiencing citizenship; I was a citizen of Stalin town. I conclude by extracting implications for the sociology of space field.
Highlights
BackgroundThe aim of this paper is to contribute to the establishing of a microsociology of urban, residential, and domestic space through an interpretive synthesis of the most recent literature in the phenomenologys of space field
Introduction to the Phenomenological Approach toUrban, Residential, and Domestic SpaceCătălina-Ionela REZEANU1 AbstractDuring the last century, in social and humanistic sciences, the dominant perspective on space was the political economy, focusing on how space relates to macro-social phenomena and minimizing the role of the micro-social ones, by conceptualizing space as a social force, constraining social actions
The aim of this paper is to contribute to the establishing of a microsociology of urban, residential, and domestic space through an interpretive synthesis of the most recent literature in the phenomenologys of space field
Summary
The aim of this paper is to contribute to the establishing of a microsociology of urban, residential, and domestic space through an interpretive synthesis of the most recent literature in the phenomenologys of space field. In explaining the social production of space, the author defines three types of spaces which interact to reproduce the capitalist mode of production: (1) representations of space (conceived space or mentalabstract space; e.g. maps, models, plans); (2) spatial practices (perceived space or how physical-material space is actively used; e.g. negotiating distances between locations, avoidable areas, daily routines); (3) representational spaces (passively lived space or symbolic space; e.g. ideas, theory, imagination, vision) He assumed representations of space play a dominant role in the production of space, he contributed majorly by suggesting that the greatest individual freedom manifests at the level of representational spaces and spatial practices from daily life where representations of space can be contested and changed. By considering the previously presented turns from the dominant macro-social approach, I intend to argue for a microsocial perspective on space, by nuancing how recent phenomenological theorizations and empirical studies could extend the literature in the field of urban, residential, and domestic space
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
