Abstract
The reversible and fast redox kinetics of bromine/bromide makes it a desirable couple as a catholyte in redox‐flow batteries (RFBs). In principle, the highest possible energy density is obtained with hydrogen‐bromine RFBs. Bromine sequestration agents, also called bromine complexing agents (BCAs), bind bromine in a non‐miscible phase and can, therefore, reduce the vapor pressure of bromine, mitigate its crossover, and result in higher practical range of electrolyte concentration. Therefore, BCAs can enhance the battery's safety and competitivity by significantly decreasing the cost of components. To date, BCAs are commonly used in membrane‐free bromine systems, which cannot provide the high current density demonstrated in hydrogen‐bromine RFBs. Herein, the drastic limitations encountered are shown while operating a hydrogen‐bromine RFB with a standard perfluorinated sulfonic acid membrane due to the strong BCA–perfluorinated sulfonic acid interaction. On the other hand, the benefits of using a polyvinylidene difluoride‐silica (PVDF–SiO2) nanoporous separator are demonstrated, which does not interact with the BCA. In this approach, the hydrogen‐bromine RFB can sustain cycling, albeit at a more moderate current than a BCA‐free battery.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
