Abstract

Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are one potential solution to grid-level electrical energy storage (EES) benefiting from a decoupled power and capacity scaling.1–3 High durability, long-calendar life, high efficiency EES with a low cost and fast response time is needed1,4 for the transition from fossil fuels to renewable sources.3 However, the low energy density3,5,6 and high capital costs5,6 of current systems preclude wide-scale deployment of this technology.In recent years, several new RFB chemistries have been explored to address these concerns.1,2,7 However, a high solubility for a high volumetric energy density remains a troublesome target.1 It is, therefore, no surprise that one growing trend in this regard is the design of redox active liquids (RALs).8–13 RALs provide a means of dramatically increasing the volumetric energy density of RFBs through either miscibility with typical supporting electrolytes, or by acting as both solvent and electrolyte themselves.9,12 In this work, we investigate a series of RALs that offer a similar theoretical energy density to conventional intercalation materials. A combination of computational and experimental techniques was employed herein for both molecular design and explanation of the physio-chemical phenomena. The candidate compounds were initially screened via electrochemical techniques to identify their electrochemical reversibility and stability. Exploration of the bulk properties was then carried out before system-level characterisation was undertaken. In tandem, the electrochemical and chemical stability of the samples was also investigated through the typical routes (NMR, EPR, UV-Vis). These systems show much promise for organic, tuneable electrical energy storage. Cao, J., Tian, J., Xu, J. & Wang, Y. Organic Flow Batteries: Recent Progress and Perspectives. Energy and Fuels 34, 13384–13411 (2020).Ding, Y., Zhang, C., Zhang, L., Zhou, Y. & Yu, G. Molecular engineering of organic electroactive materials for redox flow batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 69–103 (2018).Alotto, P., Guarnieri, M. & Moro, F. Redox flow batteries for the storage of renewable energy: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 29, 325–335 (2014).Weber, A. Z. et al. Redox flow batteries: A review. J. Appl. Electrochem. 41, 1137–1164 (2011).Potash, R. A., McKone, J. R., Conte, S. & Abruña, H. D. On the Benefits of a Symmetric Redox Flow Battery. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, A338–A344 (2016).Wang, W. et al. Recent progress in redox flow battery research and development. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 970–986 (2013).Li, Z., Jiang, T., Ali, M., Wu, C. & Chen, W. Recent Progress in Organic Species for Redox Flow Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 50, 105–138 (2022).Shimizu, A. et al. Liquid Quinones for Solvent-Free Redox Flow Batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606592 (2017).Robertson, L., Udin, M. A., Shlrob, I. A., Moore, J. S. & Zhang, L. Liquid Redoxmers for Nonaqueous Redox Flow Batteries. ChemSusChem e202300043 (2023) doi:10.1002/cssc.202300043.Chen, N., Chen, D., Wu, J., Lai, Y. & Chen, D. Polyethylene glycol modified tetrathiafulvalene for high energy density non-aqueous catholyte of hybrid redox flow batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 462, 141996 (2023).Smith, L. O. & Crittenden, D. L. Acid‐Base Chemistry Provides a Simple and Cost‐Effective Route to New Redox‐Active Ionic Liquids. Chem. – An Asian J. 18, e202201296 (2023).Zhao, Y. et al. TEMPO allegro: liquid catholyte redoxmers for nonaqueous redox flow batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 16769–16775 (2021).Huang, J. et al. Liquid Catholyte Molecules for Nonaqueous Redox Flow Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401782 (2015).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call