Abstract
The regulation of rural tourism is beneficial in improving the standard of living of the community. Rural tourism as a source of village potential management for village socio-economic development based on Law no. 6 of 2014 and Law No. 10 of 2009 Regional Government according to Law no. 23 of 2014 plays a role in developing tourism. However, it is ironic that there is disharmony in budget allocations, that in rural areas ADD and DD funds are supported, while in Kelurahan funds are limited, as a result, Kelurahan tourism is not optimal. So it is necessary to harmonize the laws governing tourism management. The purpose of this study is to determine the components of legal harmonization, the research method is in the form of normative juridical research through a statutory approach. The results of the research/findings, that (1) The legal position of the village has an autonomous priority for community empowerment and regional potential based on Law no. 6 of 2014. Meanwhile, Kelurahan is only administratively based on PP RI No. 73 of 2005 (2) Rural tourism is supported by ADD and DD funds, while Kelurahan must be independent. In conclusion, the local government is responsible for harmonizing tourism management laws through regional regulations based on Law no. 23 of 2014.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
