Abstract

The Horn of Africa and the Persian Gulf have millennial relations characterised by mutual interaction and influences. However, from the Cold War period onwards, international relations scholars focusing on strategic and security analysis have used a realist approach to depict these relations as largely one-way involvement and influence from the Gulf to the Horn of Africa. Yet, this approach portrays the Horn of Africa as a Gulf and other middle and great powers’ strategic chessboard and fails to account for the reality of political dynamics in the Horn of Africa and the agency of the local state and non-state actors in their external relations. This article argues that the realist approach’s depiction of foreign relations mainly as power struggles between unitary state actors is reductionist and presents an inadequate framework for the analysis of the Horn of Africa’s complex external relationships involving various state and powerful societal (non-state) actors. This privileges structure over agency disproportionally, requiring recalibration of the realist framework’s conceptualisation of the ‘state’ and ‘power’. As a result, the article proposes that a more nuanced actor-based account which includes domestic political dynamics and locally prominent internationally active societal actors is necessary for a more realistic analysis of the Horn’s external relations.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.