Abstract
Blasphemy cases are no longer a new case in a country with a pluralistic society like Indonesia. The blasphemy case by M. Kece is the latest case that has caught the public's attention. M. Kece is known to have committed acts of hate speech and insults to the Prophet Muhammad and Islam. This case then did not miss the attention of the media as Kompas.com also highlighted this case in absolutely a different way and construction. For this reason, this study discusses framing analysis with the Robert N. Entman model which consists of four points of analysis, namely defining of problem, diagnosing causes, making a moral judgment, and treatment recommendations on the Kompas.com news portal related to M. Kece's cause. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method with a constructionist approach to framing analysis. The results of this study concluded that Kompas.com tried to convey M. Kace's reporting accurately with subtle narrations so as not to tarnish the image of M. Kece because he was considered an ordinary YouTuber.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
