Abstract
Air-conditioning (AC) systems are the resources with the greatest flexibility potential for building demand response (DR). However, there is no unified method to quantify its flexibility under different DR measures, which results in difficulties in fully utilizing the DR potential and determining a proper regulation measure for the AC system operation strategies. To bridge this gap, the indicators of energy flexibility and power flexibility are firstly proposed in this study to compare three measures, active storage, passive storage, and temperature resetting, during the DR process of AC systems. According to the regulation measures with quantified flexibility potentials, different DR regulation measures are combined to explore the maximized stack flexibility. Based on a case study of an office building in Tianjin, the results show that among the different stacking strategies, stacking the active energy storage and temperature reset strategies produces the lowest operating cost, which is 13.8% and 22.5% lower than the stacking all three measures’ operating cost and total energy consumption, respectively. In the case of stacking the two measures, the highest energy flexibility is achieved when stacking the active and passive energy storage measure. If the temperature reset measure is further stacked, the energy flexibility can be increased by 15%.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call