Abstract

Labels in dictionaries provide information about restrictions and constraints on the use of certain words or senses in the contexts in which they occur or in relation to other words described in a dictionary. These restrictions are referred to as diasystematic information. This contribution deals with diasystematic information in four British monolingual learner’s dictionaries (OALD8, LDOCE5, CALD3, and MED2) with the emphasis on multiple labels. A detailed classification of labels is presented and an in-depth overview of labels used in combination with one another in the dictionaries under investigation is given. Then follows a discussion of labels which are often used in combination, the aim being to establish whether labels belonging to one and the same category combine with one another or whether multiple labelling consists of labels from different categories of labels. The findings of this study show that labels belonging to different groups are mostly combined, and apart from that, labels expressing diaevaluative information and those expressing diastratic information can be combined within the group. Possible reasons for this are discussed in the contribution. The inclusion of diasystematic information largely depends on the type of dictionary and especially on its intended users. Therefore, lexicographers’ decisions about whether to use a label and how to use it appropriately should be based on the user profile. This is especially true of monolingual learner’s dictionaries, where one of the main functions is to promote the active use of a foreign language where every single piece of information included in the dictionary counts. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2015-1501-07

Highlights

  • The tradition of using labels in dictionaries has existed for a long time, but lexicographers as well as dictionary users are still faced with many problems related to the system of labelling (Ptaszynski, 2010, pp. 411-412), one of the main reasons being that “many labels are umbrella terms that conceal a good deal of variation” (Atkins & Rundell, 2008, p. 496)

  • Four labels appear in three dictionaries: approving, disapproving, offensive (OALD8, CALD3, MED2; in MED2, approving and disapproving are expressed as showing approval and showing disapproval) and old use (OALD8, LDOCE5, CALD3); they belong to the groups of labels providing diaevaluative and diachronic information

  • Six labels are used in two dictionaries: figurative, slang, non-standard (OALD8, CALD3; in CALD3, not standard is used instead of non-standard), spoken, impolite (LDOCE5, MED2; in LDOCE5, not polite is used instead of impolite) and taboo (OALD8, LDOCE5)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The tradition of using labels in dictionaries has existed for a long time, but lexicographers as well as dictionary users are still faced with many problems related to the system of labelling (Ptaszynski, 2010, pp. 411-412), one of the main reasons being that “many labels are umbrella terms that conceal a good deal of variation” (Atkins & Rundell, 2008, p. 496). Labels in dictionaries are aimed at providing information about restrictions and constraints on the use of certain words or senses in the contexts in which they occur or in relation to other words described in a dictionary. These restrictions and constraints are referred to in lexicographic theory as diasystematic information or diasystematic marking Is why labels used in individual dictionaries change from edition to edition. In order to reflect language change, labels need to be updated, which is in line with Norri (2000, p. 93) as well as Bauer (1994), who carried out research into changes in the labelling of abusive nouns in five different editions of The Concise Oxford Dictionary from the period between 1911 and 1990

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call