Abstract

Abstract Aedes aegypti is a major vector of arboviruses such as dengue (DENV), Chikungunya (CHIKV) and Zika (ZIKV) that may be controlled on an area-wide basis using the sterile insect technique (SIT). Larval diet is a major

Highlights

  • Aedes aegypti is the most widespread and potential vector for transmission of dengue disease [1] and this mosquito species is responsible for spreading other vector-borne diseases like chikungunya, zika, malaria, dengue fever, encephalitis, yellow fever and filariasis [2,3]

  • A series of laboratory studies revealed that Ae. aegypti reared on Diet 1 (Micro-180) have a shorter larval developmental time, produced larger adults and greater fecundity than those developed from Diet 2 (Super Nova) (Figures 3 and 4)

  • The present findings have some similarities with the observation of Bond et al, [35] who reported Ae. aegypti larvae fed with IAEA (IAEA 2) diet (consisted of 25% bovine liver powder, 50% tuna meal, and 12.5% brewer’s yeast) in dark conditions developed significantly faster than larvae on the Laboratory Rodent Diet (LRD) Lab Diet

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aedes aegypti is the most widespread and potential vector for transmission of dengue disease [1] and this mosquito species is responsible for spreading other vector-borne diseases like chikungunya, zika, malaria, dengue fever, encephalitis, yellow fever and filariasis [2,3]. Fecundity and fertility Males and females (100 for each) Ae. aegypti developed from each diet treatment were placed inside small cages (33 x 26 x 20 cm) and supplied 10% (wt/vol) sugar solution. Male and female pupation rate of Ae. aegypti reared on Diet 1 diet was 52.00% and 48%, respectively It was 53.01% and 46.99%, respectively for those developed from Diet 2 over 4 days of total pupal production. The longevity of adult males that were caged together with females with access to sugar solution did not differ significantly between diet treatments (d=1,4 F=2.58; P=0.184) with mean longevity values of 33.00±0.57 days, and 34.16±0.44 days on Diet 1 and Diet 2 respectively, under laboratory condition

Discussion
Conclusion
Gratz NG
Barrera R
Curtis CF and Hill N
12. Service MW
21. Knipling EF
24. Briegel H and Timmermann SE
26. Zeller M and Koella JC
30. Timmermann SE and Briegel H
34. Chambers GM and Klowden MJ
Findings
37. Naksathit AT and Scot W
41. Clements AN
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call