Abstract
To determine the effect of lung protection mechanical ventilation on respiratory function in the elderly undergoing spinal fusion. Sixty 70-85 year old patients, ASA class II or III, undergoing spinal fusion were randomly assigned into 2 groups (30 in each group): a protection mechanical ventilation group (group P) and a conventional mechanical ventilation group (group C). Low VT and low level positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) mechanical ventilation were applied in group P (VT=6mL/kg, RR=12-18 b/min, I:E=1:2, PEEP=10 cmH2O, alveolar recruitment performed once every 15 min), while traditional ventilation was used in group C ( VT=10-12 mL/kg, RR=12 b/min, I:E=1:2). Arterial blood samples were taken and pH, PaO2, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2, A-aDO2, HR, SBP, DBP and CVP were recorded before the operation (T0), 1 h after tracheal intubation (T1), tracheal extubation immediately (T2), 1 h after tracheal extubation (T3), 1 d, 2 d, and 3 d after the operation (T4, T5, and T6). The pulmonary complication was also examined 1 d after the operation. At T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5, PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 in group P were higher than those in group C, but A-aDO2 in group P was lower than that in group C. Five patients had bronchitis, 5 had hyoxemia, and 3 had atelectasis in group C, but 2 bronchitis in group P. The incidence of pulmonary complication was 43.3% in group C and 6.6% in group P. There was no significant difference in HR, SBP, DBP and CVP between the 2 groups. Lung protection mechanical ventilation improves the arterial oxygenation and accelerates the recovery of respiratory functions in elderly patients after spinal fusion operation, with no influence on hemodynamics.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call