Abstract
To explore the effect of different reconstruction algorithms (ASIR-V and DLIR) on image quality and emphysema quantification in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients under ultra-low-dose scanning conditions. This prospective study with patient consent included 62 COPD patients. Patients were examined by pulmonary function test (PFT), standard-dose CT (SDCT) and ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT). SDCT images were reconstructed with filtered-back-projection (FBP), while ULDCT images were reconstructed using FBP, 30%ASIR-V, 60%ASIR-V, 90%ASIR-V, low-strength (DLIR-L), medium-strength (DLIR-M) and high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H) to form 8 image sets. Images were analyzed using a commercial computer aided diagnosis (CAD) software. Parameters such as image noise, lung volume (LV), emphysema index (EI), mean lung density (MLD), 15th percentile of lung density (PD15) were measured. Two radiologists evaluated tracheal and pulmonary artery image quality using a 5-point scale. Measurements were compared and the correlation between EI and PFT indices was analyzed. ULDCT used 0.46 ± 0.22mSv in radiation dose, 93.8% lower than SDCT (P < 0.001). There was no difference in LV and MLD among image groups (P > 0.05). ULDCT-ASIR-V90% and ULDCT-DLIR-M had similar image noise and EI and PD15 values to SDCT-FBP, and ULDCT-DLIR-M and ULDCT-DLIR-H had similar subjective scores to SDCT-FBP (all P > 0.05). ULDCT-DLIR-M provided the best correlation between EI and the FEV1/FVC and FEV1% indices in PFT, and the lowest deviations with SDCT-FBP in both EI and PD15. DLIR-M provides the best image quality and emphysema quantification for COPD patients in ULDCT. Ultra-low-dose CT scanning combined with DLIR-M reconstruction is comparable to standard dose images for quantitative analysis of emphysema and image quality.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call