Abstract
"Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location" (Lorraine Code)
Highlights
This document is protected by copyright law
Ecological Thinking: The politics of Epistemic Location, Lorraine Code proposes naturalized epistemology to effect nothing less than an epistemological sea change equivalent to Kant’s “Copernican revolution.”1 We recall that Kant disagreed with the underlying core epistemological principle shared by his modernist contemporaries’ competing rationalist and empiricist theories: that knowledge conforms to the nature of objects
Her revision of Kantian epistemology—what she claims has become the dominant epistemology of modern times, through which knowledge is deemed worthy of the name exclusively on its empirical-scientistic justificatory status—includes reforming the hegemonous instituted social imaginary which sustains and is sustained by Kant’s master narrative and its knowers, into an instituting social imaginary of ecological thinking
Summary
Publisher(s) Canadian Philosophy of Education Society ISSN 0838-4517 (print) 1916-0348 (digital) Explore this journal. Review of ["Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location" (Lorraine Code)]. This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. Review of Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location by Lorraine Code, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2006
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.