Comparison of Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly increases the risk of ischemic stroke, necessitating effective anticoagulation therapy. Warfarin has been the standard treatment, but direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as a safer and more effective alternative.Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in stroke prevention among AF patients.Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) with warfarin in AF patients were included. Primary outcomes were ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, and secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and gastrointestinal bleeding. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.Results: A total of 35 studies involving 172,350 patients were analyzed. DOACs significantly reduced ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.72–0.84, p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.79–0.92, p = 0.002). Major bleeding risk was lower (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80–0.96, p = 0.005), but gastrointestinal bleeding was higher (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.10–1.30, p < 0.001).Conclusion: DOACs provide superior efficacy and safety in stroke prevention compared to warfarin, despite a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.