Abstract

There are four general approaches to detecting lies: investigators could measure someone’s physiological responses, observe his/her behavior, analyze his/her speech, or measure his/her brain activity. The four ways to detect deceit have different theoretical underpinnings as to why differences between truth-tellers and liars may occur. The dominant theoretical rationales in each approach – anxiety and orienting response for physiological lie detection, anxiety, guilt and cognitive load for behavior, cognitive load, trying to make a convincing impression, or memory for verbal behavior, and response inhibition or memory retrieval conflict monitoring for brain activity – are discussed. Also discussed is a brief history of lie detection and accuracy rates of various lie detection tools that are used when analyzing physiological responses, behavior, speech, or brain activity (Control/Comparison Question Test, Concealed Information Test, facial emotional expressions, Behavior Analysis Interview, Statement Validity Assessment, Reality Monitoring, and Scientific Content Analysis).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call