Abstract

Implicit measures, such as heart rate, skin conductance and facial expressions, and explicit measures, such as the more traditional liking scores, are increasingly combined in laboratory food studies. In these laboratory studies, food products are typically evaluated blind, that is without brand information, and in a context that is unlike the physical and social contexts in which foods are normally consumed. Results of these laboratory studies often show little additional value of implicit compared to explicit measures. It is argued that implicit measures of food experience are not just a more expensive and more complex equivalent of traditional explicit measures but that both types of measure provide complementary information. Whereas explicit measures capture especially the sensory aspects of the food itself, implicit measures capture especially the total food experience from pre- to postconsumption, which not only relates to the food itself but also to factors such as the physical and social context in which foods are consumed in real-life. This requires that implicit measures should also be applied outside the conventional laboratory habitat. Fortunately, this becomes increasingly possible with current technical developments.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call