Abstract
Objective To compare the treatment result of interlocking intramedullary nail and external fixation in tibia and fibula fractures retrospectively. Methods Take the fifty-eight cases into two groups. One group is treated with interlocking intramedullary nail, and the other group is treated with external fixation. Results The interlocking intramedullary nailed group have advantage of lower rate of infection over the external fixed group. But they do not have significant difference on the part of healing and curative effection. Conclusion Interlocking intramedullary nail and external fixtion are both the efficient methods for the fracture of tibia and fibula. On the part of the complicating disease, the interlocking intramedullary nailedgroup have advantage of lower rate of infection over the external fixed group. Key words: External fixation; Inside fixation; Interlocking intramedullary nail; Fracture of tibia and fibula
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
