ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНО-ЕКОНОМІЧНИЙ МЕХАНІЗМ ПРОЄКТНОГО УПРАВЛІННЯ РОЗВИТКОМ НАЦІОНАЛЬНОЇ ЕКОНОМІКИ

Abstract

The article identifies the stages of the life cycle of project management for the implementation of organizational and economic mechanism for the implementation of projects for the development of the national economy: initiation, planning, resource provision, implementation and completion. Methods and tools of organizational and economic mechanism of realization of projects of development of national economy at each stage of a life cycle of project management are systematized. The author analyzes the components of the elements of the organizational and economic mechanism of implementation of national economic development projects in accordance with the stages of the project life cycle. The economic and organizational tools of realization of projects of development of national economy are analyzed. The positive aspects of project management are formulated. They are formation of a system of management and control over the implementation of national projects (national governing body, national control and contact point, representative of Ukraine in the group of auditors, national contact point); operation of project offices at eight ministries and the Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine; availability of a wide range of sources of funds for project financing; availability of results of monitoring the implementation of state investment projects on the website of the Ministry of Economic Development. The shortcomings of organizational and economic support for the implementation of projects are identified. They are lack of qualified staff of government agencies for high-quality development of feasibility studies of projects in terms of cost-benefit analysis; lack of methodological developments in the study of the peculiarities of the analysis of public investment projects; imperfect coordination between different mechanisms of financing public investment projects; unsatisfactory level of use of public-private partnership opportunities and obtaining the necessary financial resources as a result of bond issuance by local authorities; inconvenient format for providing monitoring information on state investment projects; lack of monitoring information and conclusions of beneficiaries on some international technical assistance projects provided to Ukraine; lack of results of monitoring of public-private partnership projects and projects implemented at the expense of MFIs.