Abstract
The article is devoted to the substantiation of the fact that the understanding of legal decisions as acts emanating from state-power subjects, creating legal norms or specifying the content of the rights and obligations of participants in legal relations, is unjustifiably narrow. It is proposed to consider a legal decision as a means of presenting legal requirements that reflect the subject’s ideas about fair and expedient, expressing his legal choice and justified by a reference to generally binding legal imperatives or his own subjective law. The author pays special attention to the analysis of the signs of legal decisions and their functions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
