There has been an increasing awareness over recent years of the field of veterinary forensic medicine, with involvement of veterinarians in a wide range of activities extending from the assessment of possible inflicted injuries in domestic animals to wildlife crime concerning the entrapment, transport and killing of protected and endangered species [1, 2]. More publications are occurring in this area, with for example, a special issue of Forensic Science Medicine and Pathology being recently devoted to wildlife crime, and comprehensive textbooks now emerging [2–4]. The opportunity for forensic pathologists to contribute to this area is also being increasingly recognized [5]. The link between human forensic pathology and that involving animals is obvious and the opportunity to foster collaboration between these two areas of practice should be seized upon, as information and techniques utilized by forensic pathologists may be of great use in veterinary practice. As forensic pathologists are exposed on a daily basis to lethal injuries and processes, they also have a wealth of information that can be shared with veterinary colleagues who may not have such intense exposure to this type of material. It is quite obvious that forensic pathologists with training in human disease and injury have a great deal to learn from veterinary colleagues, and that many of the dissections and conditions encountered will be completely outside their experience. However, certain conditions affecting both humans and animals may show common features, and as lethal episodes in humans may have been studied more extensively than in non-humans, cross-species comparison of cases may provide a useful guide for the possible investigation of nonhuman fatalities. A good example of this was a young adult male Indian Ocean Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops cf aduncus) that was found dead with a small Cobbler Carpetshark (Sutorectus tentaculatus) wedged firmly within its upper aerodigestive tract. Known as cafe coronary syndrome in humans, this type of death raised the possibility of neurological impairment and prompted a search for intrinsic central nervous system disease, or heavy metal poisoning in the affected animal [6]. The use of human imaging modalities, such as CT scanning, in animals with significant injuries may demonstrate more clearly the nature of the injuries than standard dissection or skeletal defleshing. For example, comminuted fracturing of the midfacial skeleton in a juvenile New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) was far more clearly shown by CT scanning prior to necropsy than afterwards, as the delicate central facial skeleton had collapsed once supporting fascia and soft tissues had been removed [7]. Unfortunately techniques routinely used in humans, such as immunohistochemical staining of tissues for microscopy using anti-human reagents may not always work in animals [8], although on occasion there may be a surprising degree of cross reactivity [9]. Another area that forensic pathologists can contribute to is in lecturing to veterinary science students on basic injury assessment and evaluation. A patterned abrasion, a stab R. W. Byard (&) Discipline of Anatomy and Pathology, Level 3 Medical School North Building, The University of Adelaide, Frome Road, Adelaide 5005, Australia e-mail: roger.byard@sa.gov.au
Read full abstract