ion that people called upon and that sometimes laid claim to you, a bit like that God he had heard about outside his home, who evidently was sovereign dispenser of good things and bad (162, t.m. [191]). In contrast with his abstract and for most part meaningless relation with his fatherland, France-for him France, not Algeria, is a virtual nation-Jacques has an immediate relation with Algeria. Not able to identify with history of France or with a country he has never seen, he identifies only with he knows.'3 The nebulous deity of French nation, snow covered roofs while they themselves grew up under an eternal (163 [192]), and patriotic obligations it demanded are contrasted with the indifferent deities of sun, of sea, or of destitution (163, t.m. [192]), who protect young Algerians without ever making demands on them. The young first men of Camus's Algeria are notjust protected from xenophobic, patriotic zeal by gods of sun and sea and by their own poverty. They are also, however, led by gods of war and inhabit a world of violence, where atrocities have always been norm among those sharing/struggling for (143 [170]). To die for a country one does not really know, France, asJacques's father did, is to die for an abstraction. To fight and even die for one's own describes authenticity and spirituality of poor (Catholic) French in following way: Being poor and French, Catholic and peasant, [the most authentic Frenchman] has no family papers.... Nothing that left any trace in papers of notaires. They never possessed anything.... [The poor Catholic] sees nothing but an immense mass and a vast race, and immediately after, immediately behind, he distinguishes nothing else. ... He plunges with pride into this anonymity. The anonymous is his patrimony. Anonymity is his immense patrimony. The more communal is, more he wants to grow out of land (Note conjointe sur M. Descartes et la philosophie cartesienne, Oeuvres en prose complbtes, v. 3, 1298-1299). Unlike Peguy, of course, Camus's defense of virtues of poverty is secular and has nothing to do with Catholicism. 13 Jacques's condition is contrasted with that of his lycee friend, Georges Didier, who, as son of an army officer, has received at birth privileges and obligations of an identifiable family and a national past: [Didier] knew history of his grandparents and his great-grandparents.... Didier knew what family was; it had throughout generations a strong existence for him, as did country where he was born through its history.... Jacques, and Pierre [a friend from a similar background] also, though to a lesser degree, felt themselves to be of another species, with no past, no family home, no attic full of letters and photos, citizens in theory of a nebulous nation (163, t.m. [191-92]). 542 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.210 on Sun, 31 Jul 2016 05:12:50 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Read full abstract