N the course of examining the charioteer mosaic discovered at Rudston (Yorks.) in 1971 it struck me that certain aspects of the iconography had been either misunderstood or overlooked in the first publications.' In particular the idea that the bust of a Season holding a rake must be identified as Winter seems to rest on a misconception. It is much more likely that the Season in question, both here and in other similar representations, is Autumn. This proposition can best be justified by reviewing first the known examples of Seasons with rakes, then all the sets of identifiable Seasons in British mosaics. There are four sites which have yielded pavements containing a Season with a rake: Pitney (Somerset), Spoonley Wood (Gloucestershire), Rudston and York.2 Of these the Pitney example, known only from a nineteenth-century lithograph by S. Hasell, is one of a series of Seasons represented in the form of running or flying Cupids, three of which survived when the pavement was drawn (No. 10 in the table below: PL. IIA). That from Spoonley Wood (now lost?) was a male bust whose three companions did not survive (No. 12: PL. IIB). The remaining two belong to series of female busts: at York (No. 14: PL. III) all four busts survive, and at Rudston (No. I1: PL. I) only three (of which one, the rake-bearer, is incomplete). Fuller details are given in the table below. It is a logical assumption, and indeed an essential premise for any interpretation, that such a distinctive attribute as a rake always refers to one specific season; but a review of previous interpretations will show that commentators have found difficulties in applying this principle and have sometimes been forced into inconsistency. On the York mosaic (PL. Ill) it is difficult to identify the bust with a rake as Winter, because there is another candidate for that season: a bust with the conventional wintry attribute of a dead branch. A late nineteenth-century handbook to the Yorkshire Museum, followed by the investigators of the Royal Commission on Historical Monuments and Professor J. M. C. Toynbee, accepted the latter as Winter and called the figure with a rake Summer.3 Mrs Anne Rainey goes further and defines the rake more precisely as a 'harvest rake'.' Dr David Smith,