Xpert Ultra Research Articles

Usefulness of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in Tunisia

Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) remains a challenging diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Cepheid, USA) for rapid diagnosis of EPTB in Tunisia. Eight hundred and forty-seven extrapulmonary samples collected from 2017 to 2021, were subjected to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra. Microscopy and culture were performed for all the specimens. The accuracy of Xpert Ultra was evaluated in comparison to the culture. Xpert Ultra diagnosed EPTB with a global sensitivity of 80.66% (74.3–85.75) and specificity of 70.87% (67.31–74.20). The molecular test was most accurate when performed in cerebrospinal fluids, bones and joints and cutaneous specimens showing a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity ranging from 70.60 to 91.11%. In lymph node samples comprising aspirates and biopsies, the sensitivity of Xpert Ultra was high 87.50% (77.23–93.53), however, the specificity was 51.08% (44.67–57.46). For pleural samples, the Xpert Ultra sensitivity was 77.50% (68.34–84.68) ranging from 71.43 to 80% in pleural biopsies and fluids respectively. The specificity in all pleural specimens was 79.56% (74.40–83.91). Xpert Ultra showed promise in the diagnosis of EPTB. The performances varied according to the site of the disease. The test may be more valuable if used in combination with other diagnostic modalities.

The diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra on Pericardial, Pleural and Ascitic cohort study fluids for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary Tuberculosis at a referral hospital in Malawi.

Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) accounts for 15% of the 1.4 million patients with TB notified in 2019. EPTB carries a high risk of mortality and so early diagnosis and treatment are important to reduce this risk. Diagnosis of EPTB in low- and middle-income countries is challenging. This study investigated the diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB Ultra for the diagnosis of EPTB (pericardial, pleural, and ascitic fluid) in adults at a referral hospital in Malawi. Adults with suspected extra-pulmonary TB were screened for evidence of extra-pulmonary fluid and tested for TB using Xpert MTB Ultra, mycobacterial culture, and a Focused Abdominal Sonography in HIV-associated TB (FASH scan). The diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB Ultra was compared to mycobacterial culture and a composite reference standard defined as a positive FASH scan or a positive mycobacterial culture or a clinical TB diagnosis (constitutional symptoms not otherwise explained with response to empirical TB treatment). There were 174 patients recruited: 99/174 (57%) pleural, 70/174 (40%) ascitic and 5/174 (3%) pericardial. Overall, 10/174 (6%) had bacteriologically confirmed TB and 30/174 (17%) were started on TB treatment based on a positive FASH scan or a clinical TB diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of Xpert ultra compared to culture was 83% (95%CI:36%-100%) and 98% (95%CI:94%-99%), respectively. Compared to the composite reference standard, the sensitivity of Xpert Ultra was 17% (95%CI:7%-34%) and specificity was 98% (95%CI:94%-100%). Xpert MTB Ultra provides good diagnostic performance on pleural, pericardial and ascitic fluid with reference to mycobacterial culture. Improved EPTB diagnostic tests are required to improve patient outcomes. We recommend larger multi-centre studies to corroborate our findings.

Bacterial pathogens in Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra-negative sputum samples of patients with presumptive tuberculosis in a high TB burden setting: a 16S rRNA analysis.

In patients with presumptive tuberculosis (TB) in whom the diagnosis of TB was excluded, understanding the bacterial etiology of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) is important for optimal patient management. A secondary analysis was performed on a cohort of 250 hospitalized patients with symptoms of TB. Bacterial DNA was extracted from sputum samples for Illumina 16S rRNA sequencing to identify bacterial species based on amplicon sequence variant level. The bacterial pathogen most likely to be responsible for the patients' LRTI could only be identified in a minority (6.0%, 13/215) of cases based on 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing: Mycoplasma pneumoniae (n = 7), Bordetella pertussis (n = 2), Acinetobacter baumanii (n = 2), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2). Other putative pathogens were present in similar proportions of Xpert Ultra-positive and Xpert Ultra-negative sputum samples. The presence of Streptococcus (pseudo)pneumoniae appeared to increase the odds of radiological abnormalities (aOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.12-6.16) and the presence of S. (pseudo)pneumoniae (aOR 5.31, 95% CI 1.29-26.6) and Moraxella catarrhalis/nonliquefaciens (aOR 12.1, 95% CI 2.67-72.8) increased the odds of 6-month mortality, suggesting that these pathogens might have clinical relevance. M. pneumoniae, B. pertussis, and A. baumanii appeared to be the possible causes of TB-like symptoms. S. (pseudo)pneumoniae and M. catarrhalis/nonliquefaciens also appeared of clinical relevance based on 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Further research using tools with higher discriminatory power than 16S rRNA sequencing is required to develop optimal diagnostic and treatment strategies for this population.IMPORTANCEThe objective of this study was to identify possible bacterial lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) pathogens in hospitalized patients who were initially suspected to have TB but later tested negative using the Xpert Ultra test. Although 16S rRNA was able to identify some less common or difficult-to-culture pathogens such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Bordetella pertussis, one of the main findings of the study is that, in contrast to what we had hypothesized, 16S rRNA is not a method that can be used to assist in the management of patients with presumptive TB having a negative Xpert Ultra test. Even though this could be considered a negative finding, we believe it is an important finding to report as it highlights the need for further research using different approaches.

Higher Sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Over Tuberculosis Culture for the Diagnosis of Spinal Tuberculosis With Open or Computed Tomography-Guided Biopsies.

Diagnostic specimens for spinal tuberculosis (STB) are mostly collected via open surgery. Percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsies are used in times of limited surgical availability. However, poor diagnostic accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) culture has been reported with this method, due to limited sample volume and the paucibacillary nature of STB. We evaluated Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra on open and CT-guided biopsies as compared with the gold standard Mtb culture and histopathology. We conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study of Xpert Ultra, as compared with tuberculosis culture and histopathology, in adults with signs and symptoms of STB at a tertiary academic hospital in South Africa from November 2020 to December 2021. Diagnostic testing was performed on 31 patients with available samples. Xpert Ultra had a sensitivity of 94.7% (95% CI, 75.3%-99.7%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 75.7%-100.0%) against a reference standard of Mtb culture and histopathology. Xpert Ultra had high diagnostic accuracy in open and CT-guided biopsy samples with sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 100% (open) and 89% and 100% (CT), respectively. Mtb culture had limited specificity for CT-guided biopsies (43%; 95% CI, 15.8%-74.9%). HIV-1 coinfection did not affect Mtb abundance measures by Xpert Ultra or culture. Xpert Ultra was also superior to culture for STB diagnosis in patients concurrently treated for pulmonary tuberculosis. Xpert Ultra detected more STB cases than culture for CT-guided biopsy samples. There was also no difference in sensitivity for open biopsies, irrespective of HIV-1 status, making it an important tool for rapid diagnosis, especially during times or in locations where open surgery is not possible or concurrent pulmonary tuberculosis treatment is initiated.

Monitoring of First-line Drug Resistance Mutations Outside the Scope of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra is Needed for Successful Control of DR-TB in Southern Mozambique.

Multidrug-resistant(MDR) tuberculosis in Southern Africa is of great concern, exacerbated by the spread of a clone harboring a mutation missed by Xpert Ultra. In Southern Mozambique, the presence of such mutation and rising cases of non-MDR isoniazid resistance highlights the need to ensure accurate detection of antimicrobial-resistance in the country.

Tuberculosis among children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases - case series

Background: Rheumatic patients have a higher frequency of tuberculosis(TB) than the general population. This study aimed to describe children and adolescents with TB and rheumatic diseases(RD) who were being treated in a reference center. Methods: A series of TB cases were investigated in a reference center for childhood TB in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 1995 to 2022. Results: Fifteen patients with underlying RD and TB were included with 8(53%) being female. The mean age at RD diagnosis was 7.10years (SD ± 0,57 years), and the mean age at TB diagnosis was 9.81 years(SD ± 0.88 years). A total of 9 cases of pulmonary TB(PTB) and 6 cases of extrapulmonary TB—pleural(2), joint/osteoarticular(1), cutaneous(1), ocular(1), and peritoneal(1)- were described. The RD observed in the 15 patients included juvenile idiopathic arthritis(9), juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus(3), juvenile dermatomyositis(1), polyarteritis nodosa(1), and pyoderma gangrenosum(1). Among the immunosuppressants/immunobiologics, methotrexate(8) was the most commonly used, followed by corticosteroids(6), etanercept(2), mycophenolate mofetil(1), cyclosporine A(1), adalimumab(1), and tocilizumab(1). The most common symptoms were fever and weight loss, and a predominance of PTB cases was noted. GeneXpert MTB/RIF® was performed in six patients and was detectable in two without rifampicin resistance; Xpert Ultra® was performed in five patients, and traces with indeterminate rifampicin resistance were detected in three. One female patient discontinued treatment, and another passed away. Conclusions: The case series demonstrated the importance of suspecting and investigating TB in RD affected patients who are using immunosuppressants/ immunobiologics, particularly in countries with high rates of TB such as Brazil.

IMPROVING THE DIAGNOSIS OF SPINAL TUBERCULOSIS AND OUR UNDERSTANDING OF ITS PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND INTERACTION WITH HIV-1 CO-INFECTION

Specific and rapid detection methods for spinal tuberculosis, with sufficient sensitivity in HIV-1 co-infected individuals, are needed, to ensure early initiation of appropriate treatment to prevent physical disability and neurological fallout. In addition, understanding the systemic and local pathophysiology of spinal tuberculosis, and its interaction with HIV-1 infection, is crucial to guide future therapeutic interventions.We prospectively enrolled adult patients presenting with signs and symptoms of suspected spinal tuberculosis, at Groote Schuur Hospital, between November 2020 and December 2021. TB diagnostic testing was performed on open and CT-guided spinal biopsies using Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra compared to gold standards TB culture and histology. A highly sensitive droplet digital PCR assay for detecting and quantifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and HIV-1 DNA was tested. Plasma inflammatory proteins were measured to assess systemic inflammation.Xpert Ultra had a high sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 100% for STB against TB culture and histology in both open and CT-guided biopsy samples. The ddPCR assay confirmed TB detection in 94% of patients with positive Xpert Ultra results. Four patients with negative TB diagnostic results had MTBC DNA detected by ddPCR. HIV-1 DNA was detected in the spinal tissues from all HIV-1-infected patients. MTBC DNA levels were significantly higher in HIV-1-co-infected spinal tissue samples (p< 0.01). We identified four biomarkers significantly associated with higher bacterial burden at the disease site (p< 0.01).Xpert Ultra and MTBC ddPCR improve the detection of STB. DdPCR can be utilized as an additional, highly sensitive tool for detecting and quantifying Mtb, in pathological samples that may be paucibacillary. These findings provide novel diagnostic and pathophysiologic insight into STB, in the context of HIV-1 infection, and provide rationale to include these tests in hospital and research settings for patients from communities burdened by TB and HIV-1.

Estimating Limit of Detection of M. Tuberculosis DNA as an Analyte Released from a Chemically Coated Solid Matrix and Using a WHO-approved CB-NAAT Platform

The limit of detection of Mtb (Mycobacterium tuberculosis) bacilli was evaluated by detection of released DNA from a chemically treated cellulose matrix. Loopful of the Mtb cells were suspended in phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), DNA was extracted from it and quantified using a commercial Mtb real time PCR quantitation kit. Synthetic sputum, prepared as the matrix of choice was mixed with defined number of Mtb bacilli and spotted onto the cellulose matrix. Mtb DNA from the matrix was released into a DNA-release buffer and detected using a WHO-approved CB-NAAT detection platform. One hundred and fifty, 500 and 1000 but not 10 Mtb bacilli/mL of synthetic sputum could be detected by this protocol. The result underlined the potential of cellulose matrix as a potent, room temperature, Mtb-infected sputum transportation, storage and DNA-release device for sensitive detection of Mtb using Mtb Xpert Ultra CB-NAAT as the WHO-approved Mtb test of choice.

Prevalence of subclinical pulmonary tuberculosis and its association with HIV in household contacts of index tuberculosis patients in two South African provinces: a secondary, cross-sectional analysis of a cluster-randomised trial

BackgroundPeople with subclinical tuberculosis (TB) have microbiological evidence of disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but either do not have or do not report TB symptoms. The relationship between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and subclinical TB is not yet well understood. We estimated the prevalence of subclinical pulmonary TB in household contacts of index TB patients in two South African provinces, and how this differed by HIV status.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional, secondary analysis of baseline data from the intervention arm of a household cluster randomised trial. Prevalence of subclinical TB was measured as the number of household contacts aged ≥ 5 years who had positive sputum TB microscopy, culture or nucleic acid amplification test (Xpert MTB/Rif or Xpert Ultra) results on a single sputum specimen and who did not report current cough, fever, weight loss or night sweats on direct questioning. Regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between HIV status and subclinical TB; adjusting for province, sex and age in household contacts; and HIV status in index patients.ResultsAmongst household contacts, microbiologically confirmed prevalent subclinical TB was over twice as common as symptomatic TB disease (48/2077, 2.3%, 95% CI 1.7–3.1% compared to 20/2077, 1.0%, 95% CI 0.6–1.5%). Subclinical TB prevalence was higher in people living with HIV (15/377, 4.0%, 95% CI 2.2–6.5%) compared to those who were HIV-negative (33/1696, 1.9%, 95% CI 1.3–2.7%; p = 0.018). In regression analysis, living with HIV (377/2077, 18.2%) was associated with a two-fold increase in prevalent subclinical TB with 95% confidence intervals consistent with no association through to a four-fold increase (adjusted OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.99–4.01, p = 0.052). Living with HIV was associated with a five-fold increase in prevalent symptomatic TB (adjusted OR 5.05, 95% CI 2.22–11.59, p < 0.001).ConclusionsMost (70.6%) pulmonary TB diagnosed in household contacts in this setting was subclinical. Living with HIV was likely associated with prevalent subclinical TB and was associated with prevalent symptomatic TB. Universal sputum testing with sensitive assays improves early TB diagnosis in subclinical household contacts.

Evidence for Tuberculosis in Individuals With Xpert Ultra "Trace" Sputum During Screening of High-Burden Communities.

"Trace" results on Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra ("Ultra"; Cepheid) -a molecular diagnostic test for tuberculosis (TB)-are often interpreted as an indication for TB treatment, but may also represent detection of nonviable bacilli or analytical error. In community-screening settings where individual TB risk is low, there is limited guidance on how to interpret Ultra-trace results. We conducted systematic Ultra TB screening of adults and adolescents (≥15 years) in Kampala, Uganda, through door-to-door and event-based sputum collection. We enrolled individuals with trace-positive sputum for detailed clinical, radiographic, and microbiological (including 2 sputum cultures, repeat Ultra, and for people with HIV, urine lipoarabinomannan) evaluation, and compared those findings with similar evaluations in controls with Ultra-negative and Ultra-positive (non-trace) sputum. Of 21 957 people screened with Ultra, 211 (1.0%) tested positive, including 96 (46% of positives) with trace results. Of 92 people enrolled with trace-positive sputum; 12% (11/92) were HIV-positive and 14% (13/92) had prior TB. The prevalence of TB among participants with trace-positive sputum results was 14% (13/92) by culture, 24% (22/92) using broader microbiological criteria, and 26% (24/92) after accounting for clinical diagnosis. The prevalence of cough and of abnormal chest computed tomography (CT) findings were 32% and 26%, respectively, if Ultra-negative; 34% and 54% if trace-positive/non-microbiologically confirmed; 72% and 95% if trace-positive/microbiologically confirmed; and 71% and 93% if Ultra-positive (more than trace). Most individuals with trace-positive sputum in Ugandan communities did not have microbiologically confirmed TB but had more symptoms and chest CT abnormalities than people with Ultra-negative sputum.

Diagnostic Efficacy of New Xpert Ultra for Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Using Culture and Composite Reference Standard.

Xpert Ultra (Cepheid, USA) is recently introduced with an extra category of trace-positive results and higher sensitivity for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis. The objective of the study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert Ultra for extrapulmonary samples using culture and composite reference standard (CRS) as the gold standard. In a 1-year (March 2021-22) prospective observational study, samples of suspected extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) patients were subjected to Ziehl-Neelsen staining, culture, and Xpert Ultra (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) tests. Relevant clinical and treatment information was noted. The diagnostic accuracy of Xpert Ultra compared with culture and CRS was calculated. Out of 1720 suspected patients of EPTB, 223 (13%), predominantly males 135 (60%), with a mean age of 41.46 ± 19.81 years, were diagnosed as TB positive following CRS criteria. The maximum cases were of pleural TB (35.4%), followed by central nervous system TB (17.9%), gastrointestinal TB (17.5%), and lymph node TB (12.1%). Of all samples, 150 (8.7%) were microbiologically confirmed, including 141 detected by Xpert ultra, 67 culture positive, and only 16 smear positive. Among the Xpert Ultra-positive samples, 35 showed trace results, including six false-positive results. Considering culture and CRS as the gold standard, the sensitivity (86.57%, 59.64%) and specificity (94.98%, 99.47%) of Xpert Ultra were calculated, respectively. Rifampicin resistance was detected in 1 (0.70%) sample. Diagnosis of EPTB is a challenge and Xpert Ultra may detect TB at a very early stage. However, it is essential to rule out false-positive results. Additional studies are needed on Xpert Ultra to interpret trace results better.

Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for the Diagnosis of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Analysis in Saudi Arabia

The incidence of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in low- and middle-income countries, as well as, high-income countries has increased over the last two decades. The acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear test is easy to perform and cost-effective with a quick turnaround time but the test has low sensitivity. Culture remains the gold standard for detecting TB; however, it has low sensitivity and slow bacterial growth patterns, as it may take up to 6 to 8 weeks to grow. Therefore, a rapid detection tool is crucial for the early initiation of treatment and ensuring an improved therapeutic outcome. Here, the Xpert Ultra system was developed as a nucleic acid amplification technique to accelerate the detection of MTB in paucibacillary clinical samples and endorsed by the World Health Organization. From March 2020 to August 2021, Xpert Ultra was evaluated for its sensitivity and specificity against EPTB and compared with those of the routinely used Xpert, culture, and AFB tests in 845 clinical samples in Saudi Arabia. The results indicate the overall sensitivity and specificity of Xpert Ultra to be 91% and 95%, respectively, compared with the Xpert (82% and 99%, respectively) and AFB smear (18% and 100%, respectively) tests. The results also indicated that despite the low microbial loads that were categorized as trace, very low, or low on Xpert Ultra, yet, complete detection was achieved with some sample types (i.e., 100% detection). Consequently, Xpert Ultra has great potential to replace conventional diagnostic approaches as a standard detection method for EPTB.

Evaluation of the Prevalence of Xpert Ultra Trace Calls and its Clinical Significance in Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis in High Tuberculosis-Endemic Setting

Introduction: This study was done to evaluate the significance of “trace calls” in Xpert Ultra for Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin and to clear clinical dilemmas for treating Xpert Ultra trace calls with antituberculosis therapy (ATT). Materials and Methods: This is an observational retrospective study that was done at Apollo Hospital, Greams Road, Chennai, between April 2022 and January 2023 (10 months). Presumptive pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients above 18 years of age with at least one Xpert Ultra load trace result on their biological samples, and in whom the same sample was tested for histological/cytological analysis, MGIT 960 system culture during diagnostic workup were included in the study. The significance of Xpert Ultra “trace calls” was evaluated by comparing them with the composite reference standard (CRS). In the study period of 10 months, among 2130 presumptive TB cases, 954 (44.78%) were Xpert Ultra detected positive. Among the 954 Xpert Ultra detected cases, 157 (16.45%) were Xpert Ultra positive with Xpert Ultra trace load. After applying the exclusion criteria, 143 Xpert Ultra trace calls were included in this study. Results: After categorizing based on the CRS, confirmed TB accounted for 30 (21%), probable TB 82 (57.34%), possible TB 22 (15.38%), and non-TB 9 (6.3%). All cases in the non-TB category were in pulmonary TB. Among the 9 non-TB cases, 8 were diagnosed with carcinoma lung by histopathology/cytology, and 1 was diagnosed with nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) disease. There was no history of prior anti-TB treatment (ATT) in these 9 non-TB cases except one case, which was now diagnosed with NTM. Conclusion: All extrapulmonary “trace calls” should be treated with ATT, and in the case of pulmonary “trace calls,” the other clinical and laboratory variables should be considered, especially in cases with prior ATT history.

Cost-effectiveness of Low-complexity Screening Tests in Community-based Case-finding for Tuberculosis.

In high-burden settings, low-complexity screening tests for tuberculosis (TB) could expand the reach of community-based case-finding efforts. The potential costs and cost-effectiveness of approaches incorporating these tests are poorly understood. We developed a microsimulation model assessing 3 approaches to community-based case-finding in hypothetical populations (India-, South Africa-, The Philippines-, Uganda-, and Vietnam-like settings) with TB prevalence 4 times that of national estimates: (1) screening with a point-of-care C-reactive protein (CRP) test, (2) screening with a more sensitive "Hypothetical Screening test" (95% sensitive for Xpert Ultra-positive TB, 70% specificity; equipment/labor costs similar to Xpert Ultra, but using a $2 cartridge) followed by sputum Xpert Ultra if positive, or (3) testing all individuals with sputum Xpert Ultra. Costs are expressed in 2023 US dollars and include treatment costs. Universal Xpert Ultra was estimated to cost a mean $4.0 million (95% uncertainty range: $3.5 to $4.6 million) and avert 3200 (2600 to 3900) TB-related disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per 100 000 people screened ($670 [The Philippines] to $2000 [Vietnam] per DALY averted). CRP was projected to cost $550 (The Philippines) to $1500 (Vietnam) per DALY averted but with 44% fewer DALYs averted. The Hypothetical Screening test showed minimal benefit compared to universal Xpert Ultra, but if specificity were improved to 95% and per-test cost to $4.5 (all-inclusive), this strategy could cost $390 (The Philippines) to $940 (Vietnam) per DALY averted. Screening tests can meaningfully improve the cost-effectiveness of community-based case-finding for TB but only if they are sensitive, specific, and inexpensive.

Use of stool swabs in molecular transport media increases access to Xpert Ultra testing for TB in children.

SETTING: Tertiary level hospital in Lusaka, Zambia.OBJECTIVE: To measure concordance between Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) results of stool with and without transport media, and compare Ultra results from the two stool processing methods to Ultra and culture results using gastric aspirates (GA).DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study collecting stool and GA from children 0-5 years presenting with signs and symptoms of TB. Stool was processed for Ultra testing by two methods: the Simple-One-Step (SOS) on an aliquot of stool and PrimeStore® MTM Molecular Transport Medium (PS-MTM) using a stool swab.RESULTS: A total of 114 children (median age: 17 months, IQR 7-30) provided both a stool and a GA sample. Stool Ultra results processed using the PS-MTM method showed high concordance with stool Ultra results processed by the SOS method, with only 1/114 discordant results. Concordance with GA Ultra was high as well, as 9/13 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) cases detected were identified by all three methods.CONCLUSION: Ultra results from stool swabs collected using PS-MTM were equivalent to results from stool using the SOS method and GA. Given that PS-MTM inactivates MTB and stabilises DNA without cold chain, using it for stool has the potential to increase access to a TB diagnosis for children in underserved areas.

Determining the diagnostic potential of Truenat MTB Plus for Tubercular lymphadenitis and detection of drug resistance and a comparison with GeneXpert Ultra

SettingTubercular lymphadenitis (TBLA), the most common form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, is a diagnostic challenge. ObjectiveTruenat MTB Plus (TruPlus) along with Truenat Rif assay (TruRif) was evaluated for detection of TBLA and rifampicin resistance and compared with GeneXpert Ultra (Xpert Ultra). Design100 fine-needle aspirated specimens [50 confirmed by culture/smear/cytology, 20 clinically suspected, and 30 controls], processed in the mycobacteriology division of department of microbiology were subjected to TruPlus and TruRif, Xpert Ultra and multiplex PCR. The results of TBLA detection were compared against composite reference standard (CRS) and those of rifampicin resistance were compared against phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and rpoB gene sequencing. ResultsIn comparison to CRS, the diagnostic yield of TruPlus, Xpert Ultra and MPCR was 77.14%, 59.18% and 84.28%, respectively; with substantial agreement for TruPlus (k = 0.66) and MPCR (k = 0.76) and moderate for Xpert Ultra (k = 0.60). TruRif reported four cases as RifR and Xpert Ultra reported two. On comparing with phenotypic DST and gene sequencing, only two cases of RifR were confirmed, hence TruRif reported false-RifR in two cases. ConclusionTruPlus could be used as a reliable tool for diagnosing TBLA. The reporting of RifR by TruRif should be confirmed by phenotypic DST or gene sequencing.

Standard diagnostics with and without urine-based lipoarabinomannan testing for tuberculosis disease in HIV-infected patients in a high-burden setting-A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Recent clinical findings reported the reduced mortality associated with treatment guided by sputum-based molecular test with urine-based lipoarabinomannan (LAM) assay for tuberculosis (TB) disease in HIV-infected individuals. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sputum-based Xpert tests with and without urine-based LAM assays among HIV-infected individuals with signs and symptoms of TB disease (TBD) from the perspective of South African healthcare providers. A one-year decision-analytic model was constructed to simulate TB-related outcomes of 7 strategies: Sputum smear microscope (SSM), Xpert, Xpert Ultra, Xpert with AlereLAM, Xpert Ultra with AlereLAM, Xpert with FujiLAM, and Xpert Ultra with FujiLAM, in a hypothetical cohort of adult HIV-infected individuals with signs and symptoms of TB. The model outcomes were TB-related direct medical cost, mortality, early treatment, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) and incremental cost per DALY averted (ICER). The model inputs were retrieved from literature and public data. Base-case analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted. In the base-case analysis, the Xpert Ultra with FujiLAM strategy showed the highest incidence of early treatment (267.7 per 1000 tested) and lowest mortality (29.0 per 1000 tested), with ICER = 676.9 USD/DALY averted. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations showed the cost-effective probability of Xpert Ultra with FujiLAM was the highest of all 7 strategies at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold >202USD/DALY averted. Standard sputum-based TB diagnostic Xpert Ultra with urine-based FujiLAM for TBD testing in HIV-infected individuals appears to be the preferred cost-effective strategy from the perspective of the health service provider of South Africa.

GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra performance to detect uncommon rpoB mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

ObjectiveTo investigate the performance of GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra to accurately detect rifampicin resistance for less common rpoB mutations that potentially confer phenotypic resistance, we tested 28 such Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures with Xpert Ultra.ResultsThey represented 22 different (combinations of) rpoB mutations. Of 28 isolates tested, one was reported by Xpert Ultra as “No rifampicin resistance detected”, 8 yielded a “Rifampicin indeterminate” result, and 19 were identified as rifampicin resistant. Overall, our results corroborate previous observations on the “Indeterminate” results for mutations at codon 432, while we add Lys446Gln as additional “Indeterminate” result and Pro439Leu as a false rifampicin-susceptible result. Furthermore, we document other uncommon point mutations and indels across the rpoB gene that are mostly correctly identified as rifampicin resistant by Xpert ultra (V3). Taken together, “Indeterminate” results in Xpert Ultra may indicate underlying rpoB mutations within the rifampicin-resistance determining region and thus increase the post-test probability of rifampicin resistance, albeit to an unknown extent.

Comparison of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Results of Stool and Sputum in Children with Presumptive Tuberculosis in Southern Ethiopia.

The introduction of stool as a readily obtainable sample and the recently developed simple one-step (SOS) stool processing method on Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) offer an opportunity for TB diagnosis in children. We conducted this study in secondary health facilities in Ethiopia, which are the first-level referral facilities for childhood TB diagnosis and treatment, with the aim to determine if stool-based TB diagnosis can be performed with a reasonable level of concordance with sputum tests using Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra. Eligible children 0-14 years old with presumptive pulmonary TB were asked to provide stools in addition to routinely requested sputum samples. We determined the level of agreement between the stool and sputum test results. Of the 373 children included in the study, 61% were <5 years of age and 56% were male. Thirty-six children (9.7%) were diagnosed with TB, and all started treatment. The rate of concordance between stool and sputum was high, with a kappa value of 0.83 (p < 0.001). There were more Xpert Ultra positive results on stool (n = 27 (7.2%)) than on sputum/NGA (n = 23 (6.2%)). Laboratories in secondary hospitals can perform stool-based TB diagnosis in children, with high concordance between stool and sputum test results reaffirming the applicability of the SOS stool method.

Pooling sputum testing to diagnose tuberculosis using xpert MTB/RIF and xpert ultra: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BackgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) using molecular tests, such as Xpert MTB/RIF (MTB/RIF) or Xpert Ultra (Ultra). These tests are expensive and resource-consuming, and cost-effective approaches are needed for greater coverage.MethodsWe evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pooling sputum samples for TB testing by using a fixed amount of 1,000 MTB/RIF or Ultra cartridges. We used the number of people with TB detected as the indicator for cost-effectiveness. Cost-minimization analysis was conducted from the healthcare system perspective and included the costs to the healthcare system using pooled and individual testing.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the overall performance of the pooled testing using MTB/RIF or Ultra (sensitivity, 93.9% vs. 97.6%, specificity 98% vs. 97%, p-value > 0.1 for both). The mean unit cost across all studies to test one person was 34.10 international dollars for the individual testing and 21.95 international dollars for the pooled testing, resulting in a savings of 12.15 international dollars per test performed (35.6% decrease). The mean unit cost per bacteriologically confirmed TB case was 249.64 international dollars for the individual testing and 162.44 international dollars for the pooled testing (34.9% decrease). Cost-minimization analysis indicates savings are directly associated with the proportion of samples that are positive. If the TB prevalence is ≥ 30%, pooled testing is not cost-effective.ConclusionPooled sputum testing can be a cost-effective strategy for diagnosis of TB, resulting in significant resource savings. This approach could increase testing capacity and affordability in resource-limited settings and support increased testing towards achievement of WHO End TB strategy.