Recently, progress toward sustainable societies with renewable energies is a critical issue to overcome environmental and social problems, for example, global warming and depletion of fossil fuels. To utilize effectively renewable energies such as solar and wind energy, conversion of renewable energies to hydrogen via water electrolysis is one of the most attractive approaches for energy storage. However, for the practical application of water electrolysis systems, its activity, durability, and catalysts cost are insufficient due to high over-potential and low kinetics of electrode reactions, especially, oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at the anode [1,2] for polymer electrolyte water electrolyzer (PEWE). As anode catalysts, iridium oxide (IrO2) particles have been used because of its high activity and durability for OER. However, iridium is one of the platinum group metals and reducing loading amount of iridium is required to reduce catalyst cost. Recently, we have successfully synthesized novel catalysts, IrO2 nanoparticle catalysts supported on nanocarbon materials with improved specific surface area, surface area per weight, of anode catalysts for PEWE. In this study, we focus on modification of IrO2 catalysts by doping of hetero atom (N) on supporting materials and characterization its electronic state condition and catalytic activity for OER. Novel catalyst of IrO2 nanoparticles supported on nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide (N-rGO) was prepared by hydrothermal synthesis. Graphene oxide (GO) prepared by modified Hummers method [3] was mixed with urea and hydrothermally treated at 180 ˚C for 12 h to synthesize N-rGO. For the synthesis of IrO2 / N-rGO catalysts, mixture of H2IrCl6 complex and N-rGO dispersed in ethanol/water mixture solution was stirred at 80 ˚C for 6 h in a flask to attach iridium oxide colloid to N-rGO and heated at 150 ˚C for 4 h in a hydrothermal autoclave to form IrO2 nanoparticles. The IrO2 / N-rGO catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy dispersed X-ray analysis (EDX), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and electrochemical methods. The OER activity of the IrO2/ N-rGO was examined in sulfuric acid solution using rotating disk electrode system. Figure 1 shows TEM image of synthesized IrO2 / N-rGO catalysts. The IrO2 nanoparticles with an average particle size of 1.2 nm are uniformly dispersed on surface of the N-rGO substrate. The loading amount of the IrO2 nanoparticles and doping weight of nitrogen atom of the IrO2 / N-rGO catalysts are approximately 9 and 7 wt%, respectively, which was estimated from EDX measurements. Figure 2 shows the results of XPS investigation on GO, N-rGO, and IrO2 / N-rGO. The XPS data reveal nitrogen doping on GO by hydrothermal synthesis of GO with urea. After the reaction between Ir complexes and N-rGO, Ir 4f peak appeared on the spectrum and intensity of O 1s was decreased due to reduction of GO during the hydrothermal reaction. Deconvolution analysis of the N 1s peak of N-rGO indicates doped nitrogen has three different types, pyridinic, pyrrolic, and graphitic type. The binding energy of the Ir 4f peak was shifted to a lower energy state. In addition, XRD pattern of the IrO2 / N-rGO catalyst suggests that the interlayer distance of graphene sheets decreased during hydrothermal reaction because of reduction of GO. The XRD data suppot the results of the XPS measurement.Figure 3 shows linear sweep voltammogram of the IrO2 / N-rGO catalyst obtained in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution. Electrochemical measurement reveals high activity of the IrO2 / N-rGO catalyst for OER, onset potential of the reaction is ca. 1.43 V and mass activity at 1.60 V is ca. 1000 A g-1. The overvoltage of the IrO2 / N-rGO catalysts is 70 mV lower than that of conventional IrO2 powder catalysts. High activity of the IrO2 / N-rGO catalyst indicates that the IrO2 / N-rGO catalyst is a promising candidate of anode material for PEWE. Acknowledgements This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number 17K05969. Reference[1] M. Carmo, D. L. Fritz, J. Mergel, D. Stolten, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38 (2013) 4901.[2] E. Antolini, ACS Catal. 4 (2014) 1426.[3] W. S. Hummers, R. E. Offeman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80 (1958) 1339. Figure 1
Read full abstract