Previous articleNext article No AccessDispute Resolution, Bargaining, and the Selection of Cases for Trial: A Study of the Generation of Biased and Unbiased DataDonald WittmanDonald Wittman Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 17, Number 2Jun., 1988 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/468132 Views: 13Total views on this site Citations: 32Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1988 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Claire B. Wofford Avoiding Adversariness? The Effects of Gender on Litigant Decision-Making, Politics & Gender 13, no.0404 (Jul 2017): 656–682.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X17000071Herbert M. Kritzer, Neil Vidmar When the Lawyer Screws Up: A Portrait of Legal Malpractice Claims and Their Resolution, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2627735David Gliksberg Does the Law Matter? Win Rates and Law Reforms, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 11, no.22 (Apr 2014): 378–407.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12044Sasha Romanosky, David Hoffman, Alessandro Acquisti Empirical Analysis of Data Breach Litigation, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 11, no.11 (Jan 2014): 74–104.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12035Jeff Yates, Damon M. Cann, Brent D. Boyea Judicial Ideology and the Selection of Disputes for U.S. Supreme Court Adjudication, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2451155Jeff Yates, Damon M. Cann, Brent D. Boyea Judicial Ideology and the Selection of Disputes for U.S. Supreme Court Adjudication, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10, no.44 (Oct 2013): 847–865.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12030Paul Brace, Jeff Yates, Brent D. Boyea Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts, Law & Society Review 46, no.33 (Aug 2012): 497–522.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00504.xSasha Romanosky, David A. Hoffman, Alessandro Acquisti Empirical Analysis of Data Breach Litigation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1986461Jeff L. Yates, Damon M. Cann, Brent D. Boyea Does the Attitudinal Model of Supreme Court Decision Making Depend on Litigation Choices? Applying the Priest-Klein Selection Hypothesis to Litigation in the High Court, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2065494Marc Poitras, Ralph Frasca A unified model of settlement and trial expenditures: The Priest–Klein model extended, International Review of Law and Economics 31, no.33 (Sep 2011): 188–195.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2011.07.006F.L. Philip Tzang A Theory of Evidence-Based Ruling in Contract Enforcement, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1872538Pamela Gershuny, Charles D. McAllister, Carolyn Rainey Reaching Settlement, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1613284Daniel P. Kessler, Daniel L. Rubinfeld Chapter 5 Empirical Study of the Civil Justice System, (Jan 2007): 343–402.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)01005-5Alan C. Marco, Kieran J. Walsh Bargaining in the Shadow of Precedent: Asymmetric Stakes Revisited, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.944999 Joni Hersch Demand for a Jury Trial and the Selection of Cases for Trial Hersch, The Journal of Legal Studies 35, no.11 (Jul 2015): 119–142.https://doi.org/10.1086/498831Jeff L. Yates, Paul Brace, Brent D. Boyea Judges, Litigants and the Design of Courts, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.937335Joni Hersch Jury Demands and Trials, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2004).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.487781Joel Waldfogel Selection of Cases for Trial, (Jan 2002): 1819–1824.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_345Jean-Pierre Benoît, Lewis A. Kornhauser Chapter 60 Game-theoretic analysis of legal rules and institutions, (Jan 2002): 2229–2269.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0005(02)03023-0Kimi Lynn King Does the Law Matter? Federal District Court Decision-Making in Fair Housing Cases, 1968–89, Social Science Research 27, no.44 (Dec 1998): 388–409.https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1998.0621 By Joel Waldfogel Reconciling Asymmetric Information and Divergent Expectations Theories of Litigation Waldfogel, The Journal of Law and Economics 41, no.22 (Jul 2015): 451–476.https://doi.org/10.1086/467397Peter Newman S, (Jan 1998): 395–559.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14286-6_4Bruce H. Kobayashi, John R. Lott In defense of criminal defense expenditures and plea bargaining, International Review of Law and Economics 16, no.44 (Dec 1996): 397–416.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(96)00034-8Martin J. Bailey, Paul H. Rubin A positive theory of legal change, International Review of Law and Economics 14, no.44 (Dec 1994): 467–477.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(94)90027-2 Combined Bibliography, Justice System Journal 16, no.22 (Sep 2014): 155–172.https://doi.org/10.1080/23277556.1993.10871176 William M. Landes Sequential versus Unitary Trials: An Economic Analysis, The Journal of Legal Studies 22, no.11 (Oct 2015): 99–134.https://doi.org/10.1086/468159 Keith N. Hylton Asymmetric Information and the Selection of Disputes for Litigation, The Journal of Legal Studies 22, no.11 (Oct 2015): 187–210.https://doi.org/10.1086/468162BRIAN OSTROM, DAVID ROTTMAN, ROGER HANSON What are Tort Awards Really Like? The Untold Story from the State Courts, Law & Policy 14, no.11 (Jan 1992): 77–106.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1992.tb00076.x Pauline M. Ippolito Resale Price Maintenance: Empirical Evidence from Litigation, The Journal of Law and Economics 34, no.2, Part 12, Part 1 (Oct 2015): 263–294.https://doi.org/10.1086/467226 J. Mark Ramseyer , and Minoru Nakazato The Rational Litigant: Settlement Amounts and Verdict Rates in Japan, The Journal of Legal Studies 18, no.22 (Oct 2015): 263–290.https://doi.org/10.1086/468148 Richard A. Epstein Beyond Foreseeability: Consequential Damages in the Law of Contract, The Journal of Legal Studies 18, no.11 (Oct 2015): 105–138.https://doi.org/10.1086/468142 Harold W. Elder Trials and Settlements in the Criminal Courts: An Empirical Analysis of Dispositions and Sentencing, The Journal of Legal Studies 18, no.11 (Oct 2015): 191–208.https://doi.org/10.1086/468146