378 SEER, 8i, 2, 2003 financial system as well as macroeconomic policies before and afterthe I998 financial crisis.Jeifries rounds off the review of economic developments with a discussion on the changing level of the quality of living as well as internationalaid. The review of political developments is divided into four sections. First, Jeffries discussesthe political reformsthat led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the establishmentof the CIS. In particular,he discussesthe initial relationshipbetween Russia and other post-Soviet states. Second, the author discussescentre-peripheryrelations with a specific look at the federal system and the Chechen Crisis. The third section contains several chapters that complete a chronology of political developments since I992. Finally,Jeffries turnshis attention to securitywith a discussionof militaryand foreign affairs. Specifically, this section discusses the relationship between Russia and the 'West'in the context of such issuesas disarmamentand Kosovo. Truly, Jeffries does offer a 'handbook' of Russian economic and political development fit for scholars,practitioners,and students. The book's greatest achievement lies in Jeffries's ability to produce an amazingly resourceful discussionbased on an extensive review of literature.Jeffries'sinability to go into great detail on many issuesis limited by the level of analysison which the author based his research. However, Jeffries shows an amazingly clear understandingof post-Soviet developments in Russia by touching on such a wide variety of differentissues. It would be easy to criticize the book for not offeringa more in-depth analysisof why Russia has come to thispoint, except that, asthe authorclearlyadmits,he isnot apoliticalscientist,econometrician, or an economic theorist. Having said this, however, there still exists a failure to relyon an explicitmethodology on which to base thisreview,if forno other reason than to give the discussiona greatersense of structure.Needless to say, as a 'handbook'of economic and political developments in the 'New' Russia, Jeffriessuppliesus with a remarkableresource. Institutefor PoliticsandInternational Studies D. J. GALBREATH University ofLeeds Cohen, Lenard J. Serpent in theBosom.7he RiseandFall of Slobodan Milos'evic. Revised and updated edition. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 2002. xix + 438 pp. Maps. Tables. Illustrations.Notes. Index. ?2 I.50. OF all the formerYugoslavleaders, Serbia'sSlobodan Milosevic has received by far the most media and scholarly attention. Generally viewed as the key instigatorof Yugoslavia'sviolent disintegrationand of some of the worst war crimes committed on European soil since World War II, Milosevic has been the subject of at least six biographies, as well as numerous other studies devoted to his regime. Among theseworks,LenardCohen's Serpent intheBosom is undoubtedly the most complete and far-reaching account of the complex historical, ideological and contextual factors that gave rise to MilogeviC's regime, sustainedit forover a decade and finallybroughtit down. In view of the fact that the thorny 'Kosovo question' represented the cornerstoneof Serbiannationalistmobilization in the post-Tito i980s, as well REVIEWS 379 as Milosevics trump card in his rise to power, Cohen begins by providing a thorough and balanced analysis of the conflicting Albanian and Serbian claims to Kosovo and the role played by both national myths and genuine historicalgrievances. He examines the perpetuation of ethnic polarization in the province under Communist rule and discusses the implications of the status reversal experienced by the Kosovo Serbs since the late i960s, which fuelledthe mythofvictimizationcentralto contemporarySerbiannationalism. Noting that until I987 Milosevic was a typical Communist apparatchik and a faithful 'Titoist', Cohen argues that Milosevic's adoption of an uncompromising and belligerent national policy represented a response to the seething nationalist discontent manifest in parts of the Serbian intelligentsia and political elite, as well as on a more grassroots level. Milosevic's political acumen consisted in tapping into deep-rooted collectivist and patriarchal tendencies in Serbianpolitical culture, which were resurfacingin the context of the post-Tito crisis. Propelling himself into power on the wings of a resurgent nationalist populism, Milosevic spent most of the I99OS manoeuvring his position to prevent himself being dragged down by the numerous hardshipsSerbia had to endure as a result of his policies and the steady decline in his popular support. Cohen examines the mechanisms and methods used by Milosevic to circumvent his political adversaries and growing voter apathy, providing a careful analysisof Serbian elites, society and politics. He assessesMilosevic's...
Read full abstract