Volume Of IOP Conference Series Research Articles

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double Blind a. All papers submitted were checked their similarity index using Turnitin. b. Papers have similarity index more than 25% were rejected. c. After that, the format of the papers was checked. Papers that did not follow the IOP template will be sent back to the authors for revision. d. All papers passed the similarity index and have already follow the IOP template will be sent to the reviewers. e. Reviewers reviewed the papers and give comments to the papers. f. Scientific committee decided if the papers: accepted, accepted with major revision, accepted with minor revision, or rejected. g. Author revised their papers and send back their revision.• Conference submission management system: All papers from the conference submitted using our system where each author must register first and submit article through submission form.• Number of submissions received: 119 Submission were received.• Number of submissions sent for review: 94 Submission was sent for review, and the rest was rejected because out of scope, low-quality article and high similarity.• Number of submissions accepted: 63 Paper accepted based on IOP EES Scope and quality• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): (63/94) x 100 = 67 %• Average number of reviews per paper: 2times• Total number of reviewers involved: 8 Reviewer Involved + 6 Editors• Any additional info on review process: Each reviewer gets 6-7 papers from first submission until dateline submission by author (4-5 month), and we give each reviewer MAX 14 days to send back the review result to committee.• Contact person for queries: Robbi Rahim, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Sukma, Medan, Indonesia and University Malaysia Perlis, MalaysiaEmail: robbirahim@ieee.org, Whatsapp +62 8126326393

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Single-blind peer review: All submitted full papers will be peer-reviewed by two reviewers. The acceptance will be granted if the recommendations from the reviewers are positive. The criteria are based on the technical contents, clarity, and format. Authors should make sure the submitted papers use the template for this conference. There are three review processes: Initial Review, Peer Review and Recommendation.Initial ReviewThe editor evaluates each manuscript in the submission track to determine if its topic and content are suitable for consideration for the conference before being reviewed. Manuscripts that do not meet the minimum criteria are returned to the authors.Peer ReviewManuscripts that pass the initial review by the editors will be sent to two (2) referees based on their expertise. Reviewer identities are concealed from the author, and throughout the review process. The reviewers are asked to evaluate the manuscript based on its originality, soundness of methodology, impact to design research, and relevance to design practices. To facilitate timely publication, reviewers are asked to complete their reviews and provide individual critiques within two weeks. After collecting the referees’ reports, the editors make a recommendation on the acceptability of the manuscript.Acceptance DecisionBased on the reviewer’s comments, the editor makes a final decision on the acceptability of the manuscript and communicates to the authors the decision, along with reviewers’ reports. The final decision can be “Accept Submission”, “Revisions Required”, or “Decline Submission.” The revised version should be submitted considering the review comments.• Conference submission management system: Authors register Online through Conference website at https://ctress.umk.edu.my. After registration, the author can submit the abstract and full paper at the conference website system.• Number of submissions received: 125 articles received• Number of submissions sent for review: 115 articles sent for review• Number of submissions accepted: Early submission accepted: 92 articles accepted by conference’s scientific committeeFinal submission accepted: 79 articles accepted by IOP Publishing (EES)• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): (79/125) x 100 = 63.2% • Average number of reviews per paper: Average two reviews per paper• Total number of reviewers involved: 50 reviewers• Any additional info on review process: The review process was conducted using a conference website system that integrated with the conference secretariat email and editorial email. The invitation to review the full paper was sent by email. Each full paper submitted was sent to two (2) reviewers to assess the full paper based on seven (7) section as follow:1. The originality of the full paper.2. The quality of the research design and methodology.3. The readability of the paper and clarity of the structure.4. Literature review and adequate use of references5. Clarity of the abstract.6. The format of the full paper.7. Adequate data analyses and quality of discussion.8. Recommendation by reviewer whether accepted or rejected.9. Specific comment by the reviewer to the author.All the comments by the reviewer were sent to the author to do the correction within two (2) weeks. The author needs to submit the corrected version of the full paper together with the checklist of corrections. The editor will review and make sure the authors have addressed all the corrections. After that, the camera-ready version was sent to the author for final check before being submitted to the publisher.• Contact person for queries: Muhamad Azahar AbasFaculty of Earth ScienceUniversiti Malaysia Kelantanazahar.a@umk.edu.my

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind review• Conference submission management system: Yaseen Academy• Number of submissions received: 12• Number of submissions sent for review: 10• Number of submissions accepted: 3• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 30%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 5• Any additional info on review process: A preliminary review was conducted by the main editor and only the approved papers were sent for peer-review.• Contact person for queries: Iris Zhang (Yaseen Academy, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei, China, iriszhang@yaseen.org.cn)

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind• Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Firstly, plagiarism and machine-generated documents checking with Turnitin, any fraudulent paper will be rejected directly. Secondly, only the formatted paper with the Template strictly will be submitted to the peer review process. Thirdly, according to the research topic of the article, the technical committee chair shall assign 2 to 3 reviewers.The reviewers shall give scores and comments based on the Scope, Structure* and Written English; if the average score is more than 7 points, the paper will be accepted; papers should be overhauled/repaired when their scores are 5 to 6 points; if the score is less than 5 points, papers shall be rejected.The paper shall be subject to peer review again after overhauling OR the technical committee chairs make the final decision.When the score gap is greater than 3, the manuscript will be assigned to the third reviewer, OR the technical committee chairs make the final decision. Finally, all accepted papers must be registered and assigned a presentation type before they are submitted for publishing.*Full-papers should have the following elements for the StructureMetadata – title, keywords, abstract, professional affiliation(s), and cited references., Introduction, Methods, Results and Conclusion Conference submission management system: Easy Chair• Number of submissions received: 65• Number of submissions sent for review: 55• Number of submissions accepted: 30• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 55%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2-3• Total number of reviewers involved: 18• Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system):Turnitin system(https://www.turnitin.com)• Contact person for queries:Ms. Edith YoungSchool of Environment, Beijing Normal University(g2esd@g2esd.net)

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.Type of peer review:Single-blind.The reviewers were sent the articles along with the name of authors for the review process. However, the authors were not informed the name of reviewers. Each reviewer has been given 3-4 articles and the complete review process took approximately 60 days.• Conference submission management system: Easy Chair Management System• Number of submissions received: 101• Number of submissions sent for review: 101• Number of submissions accepted: 76Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 75• Average number of reviews per paper: 3• Total number of reviewers involved: 20• Any additional info on review process:All authors were notified of the peer review decision on their paper. They received one of three possible decisions:• Accept: The paper will be published without edits.• Accept with revision: The paper will be accepted after implementation of edits suggestedby the reviewers and submit revised version.• Reject: The paper will not be presented at the conference or published in the conferenceContact person for queries:Dr. Priyansha MehraAssociate ProfessorManipal University JaipurEmail id: Priyansha.mehra@jaipur.manipal.edu, cbrice2021@gmail.com

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review:Double-blind• Conference submission management system:Iconf submission system• Number of submissions received:29 papers• Number of submissions sent for review:29 papers• Number of submissions accepted:16 papers• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100):55.17%• Average number of reviews per paper:2 papers• Total number of reviewers involved:13 reviewers• Any additional info on review process:1. Preliminary ReviewWhen we received authors’ paper(abstract and full paper), we will submit the paper to auditing department for checking, the auditing department will review the content, format and grammers.2. The full papers passed the first review will be eviewed again by conference technical committees from the following aspects: Originality, Innovation, Technical Soundness, Applicability, Clarity of presentation and Relevance.3. Only the paper passed the first review and the second review, it can be published.• Contact person for queries:Prof. Chi Yung ChungUniversity of Saskatchewan, Canada c.y.chung@usask.ca Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement.The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind• Conference submission management system: CMT• Number of submissions received: 31• Number of submissions sent for review: 28• Number of submissions accepted: 15• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 54%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 10• Any additional info on review process: All the submitted papers were submitted for peer-review. Only accepted and presented papers are included in the conference proceeding. Manuscript requirements:1. Manuscripts must be written in English2. The manuscript should be written in accordance with the standard of template3. The topics of paper should be relevant to conference topics4. Plagiarism and duplicate submission are prohibited5. Innovation and scientific value is a must.• Contact person for queries: Name : Suzy ShihAffiliation: HKSMEEmail : suzyshih@smehk.org

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind• Conference submission management system: - contact person: Vadim Pavlov, e-mail digitalforestftu@gmail.com• Number of submissions received: 43• Number of submissions sent for review: 43• Number of submissions accepted: 41• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 95,35• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 9• Any additional info on review process: -• Organizing committee: Chair – Olga Shaitarova, head of the congress department Members:– Vadim Pavlov, senior specialist, congress department;– Elena Chugunova, senior specialist, congress department.• Program commitee: Chair – Irina Melnichuk, Deputy Rector Members :– Dmitry Musolin, Vice-rector for Research and International Activities;– Alexander Alekseev, Head of the Department of Forest Inventory, Forest Management and GIS;– Alexander Kriukovsky, Director of the Institute of Landscape and Architecture, Constructions and Wood Processing;– Anatoly Chubinsky, Head of the Depatement of Technology of Wood-based Materials and and Wooden Constractions;– Olga Polyanskaya, Head of the Department of Economics, Accounting and Economic Analyses;– Svetlana Tereschenko, Assosiate professor of the Department of Economics, Accounting and Economic Analyses;– Marsel Vagizov, deputy Head of the Depatrment of Informational Systems and Technologies.• Contact person for queries: Name : Olga ShaitarovaAffiliation: Head of the Congress Department, Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University Email : ftaconference@gmail.com

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double Blind Review• Conference submission management system: Submission has been received through mail and Peer Review has been followed.• Number of submissions received: 27• Number of submissions sent for review: 27• Number of submissions accepted: 14• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 51.85%• Average number of reviews per paper: 3 (1-Preliminary- Format, Language, Reference Cross Check and Title search + 2-Technical)• Total number of reviewers involved: 30 Any additional info on review process:• All the manuscripts have been reviewed by subject Experts from the various potential research Institutions. Focused on language, Format, Similarity and Novelty. And the revised manuscript will be incorporated as per the suggestion and comments from the journal.• Contact person for queries: Dr.I. Saravanan, Convener & Guest Editor,ICAMBC_2021.Email : is.mech@outlook.com Phone : 98414 44418

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind• Conference submission management system: AI Scholar System• Number of submissions received: 151• Number of submissions sent for review: 135• Number of submissions accepted: 84• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 55.6%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 40• Any additional info on review process:• Step 1. Each of selected paper will be reviewed by two/three professional experts in the related subject area.• Step 2. Review Reports received from the experts will be judged by one of the editors either Review Reports are logical or not?• Step 3. If not logical, then editor can assign new reviewer or can also judge at his/her own.• Step 4. If logical, then Review Reports will be sent to authors to modify the manuscript accordingly.• Step 5. Authors will be required to revise their papers according to the points raised.• Step 6. Revised version will then be evaluated by the editor for the incorporation of the points raised by the reviewers.• Step 7. Then the editor will send the revised manuscript to the reviewers again for re-evaluation.• Step 8. If the reviewers approve the revise version of the manuscript, then will be accepted for publication.• What criteria were considered when assessing the articles:A. Style and Organization:1.Is the paper clearly presented and well organized?2.Is the English satisfactory?3.Is the title appropriate?4.Are the figures, tables, and their captions clear?5.Are the references to related work adequate?B. Scientific Qualityl.Contains significant contributions to the advancement of the subject.2.Sound, original, and of interest.3.Does not add to knowledge of the subject.4.Contains fundamental errors.• Contact person for queries:Xuexia Ye publication@keoaeic.org AEIC Academic Exchange Information Centre

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blindThe conference Program Committee chose 3 reviewers. The papers were distributed so that each was reviewed by two reviewers. • Conference submission management system:Conference site: http://vgistikhiya.ru/index.php/konferentsiiConference secretary mail: sozaeva.lezhinka@yandex.ru • Number of submissions received: 43 • Number of submissions sent for review: 43 • Number of submissions accepted: 40 • Acceptance Rate: 93% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 3 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries:Sozaeva Lezhinka TanashevnaFederal state budgetary institution «High Mountain Geophysical Institute»+7(928) 723 20 08 sozaeva.lezhinka@yandex.ru

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind• Conference submission management system: VSIS ConfTool• Number of submissions received: 126• Number of submissions sent for review: 118• Number of submissions accepted: 100• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 79.36%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 22• Additional info on review process: Papers that only display abstracts and in languages other than English were rejected and not distributed to reviewer. Each reviewer received 8 to 12 papers. The review was carried out within a period of 2 months. The paper was considered “accepted” if it has a score of more than 75 and has been revised based on reviewers’ comments. Review process based on the following factors:1. Quality of content = 15%2. Significance for theory and practice = 15%3. Originality and level of innovativeness = 20%4. Thematic Relevance for the "Call for Papers" = 15%5. Quality of presentation = 10%6. Overall recommendation = 25%Even though papers were considered “accepted’ by reviewers, the proceedings publisher reserves the right to exclude any papers if in its opinion, the papers are considered inappropriate for publication by the publisher.• Contact person for queries: Name : M. Asad AbdurrahmanAffiliation: Universitas HasanuddinEmail : asad@unhas.ac.id

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science has been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind• Conference submission management system: 1. The manuscripts were submitted to the conference organizers through personal account on the conference website https://hydroconf.psu.ru/account.php or through e-mail hydroconf.iop@gmail.com by corresponding author.2. The manuscripts were verified on compliance with the conference sub-themes, checked for plagiarism and quality of translation into English.3. The manuscripts were sent for double-blind review. In a case if reviewer made some comments about manuscript, the authors asked to address the reviewer comment (if any) and resubmit the manuscript again.4. The revised manuscripts were checked again by reviewer.5. In a case if one reviewer declined manuscript it was redirected to third reviewer.6. Checking for the format of manuscripts.7. After manuscript acceptance the authors were asked to sign the licence terms and conditions.8. At the last the manuscripts were submitted to the IOP Publishing.• Number of submissions received: 107• Number of submissions sent for review: 85• Number of submissions accepted: 67• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 63%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 10• Any additional info on review process: To be accepted for publication, the material must have the following requirements: compliance with the conference theme; a high level of originality of the text (at least 80%); positive expertise of reviewers; good level of English and well-formed material.• Contact person for queries: Mikova Ksenia, PhDEditor of the volume, Perm State University, Perm, Russiahydroconf.iop@gmail.com

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-Blind Review • Conference submission management system: www.icomta2020.edas.info • Number of submissions received: 28 • Number of submissions sent for review: 25 • Number of submissions accepted: 19 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 68% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 30 • Any additional info on review process: After the paper submitted through submission management system, the paper directly scrutinized by Editor to check for its scope, technical relevance, plagiarism, and originality using similarity software. Manuscripts which passed the criteria were sent to the field experts for Double-Blind Review. • Contact person for queries: Dr. Eng. Mohammad Abu Jami’inChairmanJammy@ppns.ac.id

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: https://imt.uoradea.ro/conference/conf.detail.php?workID=0• Number of submissions received: 70 • Number of submissions sent for review: 70 • Number of submissions accepted:47 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 67.15% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:6 • Any additional info on review process: The Editorial Board of the International Conference Annual Session of Scientific Scientific manuscripts IMT Oradea appraised that the researchers who submit a manuscript to the Conference, to be published on Conference Proceedings, have the right to a careful, timely and unbiased peer-review overseen by the journal editors, who often seek the advice of referees. Editorial Board of the Conference, following the principle of transparency, accepts that the authors have to know in advance the processes by which their manuscript will be handled, and a right to be informed of the grounds for the acceptance or rejection of their manuscript, including normally being given access to any referee reports that have been sought.Every collaborator of the Conference, i.e. researchers, authors who decide to submit a manuscript, must adhere to high standards of research integrity and sound scholarship. It is the responsibility of authors to submit a well documented and well-written scientific manuscript if necessary, seeking advice if it is not written in their native language, to clearly describe any novel and non-trivial content, and to suitably acknowledge the contributions of others, including referees. Submission of a scientific manuscript to be published on to the Proceedings of the Conference implies that it is not currently under consideration by any other journal or Conference. Any substantial overlap with other published or submitted scientific manuscripts is appropriately acknowledged. In addition, authors should be responsive to correspondence with the journal. Even though a scientific manuscript has multiple authors, they should communicate fully, speak with one voice, and accept mutual responsibility in their communications with the journal. All authors are expected to have materially contributed to the scientific manuscript and be familiar with its contents.List of Article I. Step 1: (The Author), Article II. Step 2: (The Editor), Article III. Step 3: (The Reviewer), Recommendation, Article IV. Step 4 : (The Author), Contact person for queries are available in this pdf.

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: JPCS have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) A group of reviewers with good reputation of international publication were assigned to review the manuscripts of SAMSES 2020 using Konfrenzi Automated Conference System. Prior to the review process, all the reviewers were briefed by Prof. Ade Gafar Abdullah on a virtual meeting regarding the reviewing process. As many as 15 reviewers were then eligible in which each was sent 2-3 papers through the submission system. They were given two weeks to finish their review process and given a certain amount of incentive once they finish their task. After the deadline, the reviewed manuscripts were sent to the participants (authors) using the system through their personal account. The authors were given two weeks to revise their manuscripts and send them back to the committee using their account. Papers whose revision was in accordance with the reviewers’ comments went into final editing process (paper template layout checking, proofreading, etc.) and those which need further revision went into the second round of review process. All the manuscripts and other required data were submitted to IOP after they passed final editing.• Conference submission management system:Konfrenzi Automated Conference System• Number of submissions received:197• Number of submissions sent for review:136• Number of submissions accepted:65• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100):65/197 × 100 = 32.9%• Average number of reviews per paper:9• Total number of reviewers involved:15• Any additional info on review process:-• Contact person for queries:ade_gaffar@upi.edu

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• All the full papers submitted and presented in ICSUNR were reviewed by single blind review method• Conference submission management system:https://ocs.unpatti.ac.id/index.php?conference=icsunr&schedConf=icsunr">https://ocs.unpatti.ac.id/index.php?conference=icsunr&schedConf=icsunr Email : icsunr_unpatti2020@yahoo.com• Number of submissions received: 66 papers• Number of submissions sent for review: 66• Number of submissions accepted: 59• Acceptance Rate: 89,39%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 9 reviewers• Any additional info on review process1. Submission paper was sent to an expert reviewer;2. Feedback/revision from reviewer was sent to correspondence author to be revised;3. Revised paper of the author was sent back to the reviewer.4. If reviewer does not agree with the revised version, the paper was sent again via correspondence author to be re-revised;5. If reviewer agree with the revised version, editor will check the paper before sending it to IOP Publisher to be published in Earth and Environmental Science•Contact person for queries:Name : Dr. Ir. J. Audrey Leatemia, M.Sc.Affiliation: Pattimura University, Ambon - Indonesia Email : johanna.leatemia@faperta.unpatti.ac.id

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind• Conference submission management system: AI Scholar System• Number of submissions received: 45• Number of submissions sent for review: 39• Number of submissions accepted: 29• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 64.4%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 15• Any additional info on review process: • Step 1. Each of selected paper will be reviewed by two/three professional experts in the related subject area.• Step 2. Review Reports received from the experts will be judged by one of the editors either Review Reports are logical or not?• Step 3. If not logical, then editor can assign new reviewer or can also judge at his/her own.• Step 4. If logical, then Review Reports will be sent to authors to modify the manuscript accordingly.• Step 5. Authors will be required to revise their papers according to the points raised.• Step 6. Revised version will then be evaluated by the editor for the incorporation of the points raised by the reviewers.• Step 7. Then the editor will send the revised manuscript to the reviewers again for re-evaluation.• Step 8. If the reviewers approve the revise version of the manuscript, then will be accepted for publication.• What criteria were considered when assessing the articles:A. Style and Organization:1. Is the paper clearly presented and well organized?2. Is the English satisfactory?3. Is the title appropriate?4. Are the figures, tables, and their captions clear?5. Are the references to related work adequate?B. Scientific Quality1. Contains significant contributions to the advancement of the subject.2. Sound, original, and of interest.3. Does not add to knowledge of the subject.4. Contains fundamental errors.• Contact person for queries: Xuexia Yepublication@keoaeic.orgAEIC Academic Exchange Information Centre

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind• Conference submission management system: AI Scholar System• Number of submissions received: 40• Number of submissions sent for review: 38• Number of submissions accepted: 26• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 65%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 20• Any additional info on review process:• Step 1. Each of selected paper will be reviewed by two/three professional experts in the related subject area.• Step 2. Review Reports received from the experts will be judged by one of the editors either Review Reports are logical or not?• Step 3. If not logical, then editor can assign new reviewer or can also judge at his/her own.• Step 4. If logical, then Review Reports will be sent to authors to modify the manuscript accordingly.• Step 5. Authors will be required to revise their papers according to the points raised.• Step 6. Revised version will then be evaluated by the editor for the incorporation of the points raised by the reviewers.• Step 7. Then the editor will send the revised manuscript to the reviewers again for re-evaluation.• Step 8. If the reviewers approve the revise version of the manuscript, then will be accepted for publication.• What criteria were considered when assessing the articles:A. Style and Organization:1. Is the paper clearly presented and well organized?2. Is the English satisfactory?3. Is the title appropriate?4. Are the figures, tables, and their captions clear?5. Are the references to related work adequate?B. Scientific Quality1. Contains significant contributions to the advancement of the subject.2. Sound, original, and of interest.3. Does not add to knowledge of the subject.4. Contains fundamental errors.• Contact person for queries:Xuexia Yepublication@keoaeic.orgAEIC Academic Exchange Information Centre

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double Blind a. All papers submitted were checked their similarity index using Turnitin. b. Papers have similarity index more than 25% were rejected. c. After that, the format of the papers was checked. Papers that did not follow the IOP template will be sent back to the authors for revision. d. All papers passed the similarity index and have already follow the IOP template will be sent to the reviewers. e. Reviewers reviewed the papers and give comments to the papers. f. Scientific committee decided if the papers: accepted, accepted with major revision, accepted with minor revision, or rejected. g. Author revised their papers and send back their revision• Conference submission management system: All papers from the conference submitted using our system where each author must register first using https://icese2020.kresnanusantara.co.id/• Number of submissions received: 163 Submission were received• Number of submissions sent for review: 161 Submission was sent for review, and the rest was rejected because out of scope, low-quality article and high similarity• Number of submissions accepted: 96 Paper accepted based on IOP EES Scope and quality• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): (96/161) x 100 = 59.5 %• Average number of reviews per paper: 2 Times• Total number of reviewers involved: 10 Reviewer Involved + 3 Editors, each reviewer received 8-10 papers with 2 weeks review process• Any additional info on review process: NONE• Contact person for queries: Robbi Rahim, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Sukma, Medan, Indonesia and University Malaysia Perlis, MalaysiaEmail: robbirahim@ieee.org, Whatsapp +62 8126326393