Peer review declaration

Abstract

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: https://imt.uoradea.ro/conference/conf.detail.php?workID=0• Number of submissions received: 70 • Number of submissions sent for review: 70 • Number of submissions accepted:47 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 67.15% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:6 • Any additional info on review process: The Editorial Board of the International Conference Annual Session of Scientific Scientific manuscripts IMT Oradea appraised that the researchers who submit a manuscript to the Conference, to be published on Conference Proceedings, have the right to a careful, timely and unbiased peer-review overseen by the journal editors, who often seek the advice of referees. Editorial Board of the Conference, following the principle of transparency, accepts that the authors have to know in advance the processes by which their manuscript will be handled, and a right to be informed of the grounds for the acceptance or rejection of their manuscript, including normally being given access to any referee reports that have been sought.Every collaborator of the Conference, i.e. researchers, authors who decide to submit a manuscript, must adhere to high standards of research integrity and sound scholarship. It is the responsibility of authors to submit a well documented and well-written scientific manuscript if necessary, seeking advice if it is not written in their native language, to clearly describe any novel and non-trivial content, and to suitably acknowledge the contributions of others, including referees. Submission of a scientific manuscript to be published on to the Proceedings of the Conference implies that it is not currently under consideration by any other journal or Conference. Any substantial overlap with other published or submitted scientific manuscripts is appropriately acknowledged. In addition, authors should be responsive to correspondence with the journal. Even though a scientific manuscript has multiple authors, they should communicate fully, speak with one voice, and accept mutual responsibility in their communications with the journal. All authors are expected to have materially contributed to the scientific manuscript and be familiar with its contents.List of Article I. Step 1: (The Author), Article II. Step 2: (The Editor), Article III. Step 3: (The Reviewer), Recommendation, Article IV. Step 4 : (The Author), Contact person for queries are available in this pdf.