Despite the many discrepancies in results and the different experimental methods used, both papers arrive at the same conclusion. S4 segments rotate when depolarized, and this rotation moves charged residues from an intracellular vestibule to an extracellular vestibule (Figure 2BFigure 2B). One reason this mechanism is so appealing is that the residues most important for charge transfer, the outermost four charged residues, lie along one face of an α helix. Note that in order for this mechanism to account for charge transfer, the direction of the electric field cannot be oriented parallel to the plane of the membrane, as implied for example by the shaded regions in Figure 1CFigure 1C, but more perpendicular to the membrane (Figure 2BFigure 2B). This reorientation of the electric field is a consequence of the topology of the aqueous vestibules surrounding the S4 segment.One prediction of these models is that the residues on the backside of this stripe of positive charge, i.e., the neutral residues between the charged residues in the primary sequence, should move in the opposite direction, from extracellular to intracellular during a depolarization. This does not occur. The residues between the second and third arginines in the primary sequence are in an intracellular compartment at hyperpolarized voltages (Figure 1CFigure 1C). This does not eliminate the possibility that S4 rotates. It means that the gating pore also undergoes conformational changes as the S4 segment moves. This fact is also apparent from accessibility studies, which suggest that the length of the gating pore changes with depolarization (Figure 1CFigure 1C).What message can we take home about S4 movement? As attractive as it is, the claim for a rotation as large as 180° is weak. Furthermore, even if a smaller rotation contributes to charge movement, it is likely to be only one of the movements of S4 and the protein surrounding it. Perhaps the most important conclusion supported by both studies is that the movements of the S4 segment are very small, as one might expect for a conformational change that has to be fast enough to underlie the gating currents.The raison d'etre of an S4 segment is not charge movement; it is the control of the activation gates at the bottom of the S6 segments. How are these movements coupled? One possibility is that movement of the S4 segment tugs or twists the linkers that connect it to S3 and S5 segments, and these segments transmit this movement to the S6 segment. Another possibility is that S4 and S6 are like entwined lovers. One cannot move without a compensatory rearrangement of the other. For example, S4 rotation may cause S6 rotation, a movement that underlies the gating of a bacterial potassium channel (Perozo et al. 1999xPerozo, E., Cortes, D.M., and Cuello, L.G. Science. 1999; 285: 73–78Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (461)See all ReferencesPerozo et al. 1999). The answers to these mysteries will surely unfold with the next episode of conformational studies of voltage-dependent gating.*E-mail: richard.horn@mail.tju.edu.
Read full abstract