465 Ab Imperio, 1/2002 Seymour BECKER RUSSIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY BETWEEN EAST AND WEST: SOME AFTERTHOUGHTS IN 2002 The theme of East vs. West, Asia vs. Europe, is a very old one in European history, with roots in Greco-Roman civilization, Europe’s parent. The Greeks invented the words Asia and Europe for the lands on the opposing shores of the line of bodies of water from theAegean Sea in the south to the Don River in the north. A cultural connotation was added to the words by the fifth century B.C.E., when the Greek city-states clashed with the Persian Empire. The notion of a sharp cultural difference was strengthened when Rome’s imperial expansion brought her face to face with the Hellenistic kingdoms of the Near East, and then the Neo-Persian (Sassanian) Empire. During these centuries, and for many more to come, the termsAsia and Orient applied only to the westernmost portions of the continent – those best known to the Greeks, Romans, and their heirs – as distinct from the much less known India and the more-mythical-than-real Far East. During its formative period in the Early Middle Ages, Latin Christendom , later known as European or Western civilization, was in the process of differentiating itself from its eastern neighbor and sibling, Orthodox Christendom. By the time this process reached completion in the mutual distrust of the twelfth century, much of Orthodox Christendom had been conquered by Islam, and the rest would soon follow. By the late fourteenth 466 S. Becker, Russian Historiography Between East and West... century, Latin Christendom’s only adjoining civilization was, and would long remain, Islam. A partial exception was the Russian lands, a peripheral part of Orthodox Christendom, which from the thirteenth to the fifteenth century was under the control ofAsian steppe nomads, themselves converted to Islam during this period. There is no evidence that Russians in the Kievan and udel’nyi periods perceived their encounters with their nomadic neighbors as part of an agelong struggle between East and West, Asia and Europe. In the sixteenth century Moscow presented itself as the successor to Constantinople, the Christian capital, and its conquest of Kazan as a Christian victory over Islam. Schismatic Europe was left out of this picture, and the struggle of religions was not yet seen as one between civilizations. Only from Peter’s time on did Russia place her earlier confrontation with the steppe nomads, along with her contemporary encounters with neighbors across the breadth of the Asian continent, in the context of a struggle between East and West. This was the inevitable result of Russia’s having joined the European state system and begun the process of Westernization, in the cultural as well as other spheres. Educated Russians fully subscribed to European notions of East and West. This deeply rooted dichotomous view of the world had survived the discovery of the trans-Atlantic “New World,” whose political, demographic, and cultural integration into Europe had begun in the sixteenth century. Russians, however, were fully aware that their country’s inclusion in the West was recent and in many ways not fully accepted by the latter. The intelligentsia’s efforts at coping with this problem are the subject of my 1991 article, which follows this introduction. Russia’s role between East and West was an important theme for the most widely read nineteenth-century historians – the authors of multi-volume histories of Russia and of school textbooks. These historians are only touched on in the following article; they are treated more fully in an earlier article of mine.1 However much they differed among themselves on other subjects, they were of one mind on Russia’s relationship to Asia. In the first half of the century, N. M. Karamzin and his successors (I. K. Kaidanov, N. A. Polevoi, M. P. Pogodin, N. G. Ustrialov, and A. O. Ishimova) depicted Russia’s Christian neighbors in Europe as motivated in their dealings with Russia by fear, suspicion, envy, and greed. (One may say that they treated Russia not too differently from the way in which they 1 The Muslim East in Nineteenth-Century Russian Popular Historiography // Central Asian Survey. 1986. Vol. 5, No...
Read full abstract