Vein Graft Intervention Research Articles

TCT-754 Native Coronary Artery Instead of Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention for Treatment of Significant Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions (NASA Registry)

TCT-754 Native Coronary Artery Instead of Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention for Treatment of Significant Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions (NASA Registry)

Contemporary Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention: New Insights but Still More Questions

Contemporary Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention: New Insights but Still More Questions

Outcome of Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents: A SCAAR Report

BackgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) is associated with poor outcomes and is often regarded as inferior to native vessel PCI. We investigated clinical outcomes of SVG-PCI using contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES), in a complete, nationwide population. MethodsThe complete Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) was used to identify all patients in Sweden who underwent SVG-PCI with a contemporary DES between 2013 and 2020. Baseline characteristics, procedures, and outcomes were described. ResultsA total of 2198 SVG-PCI procedures with 3106 contemporary DES were included. Patients had a high incidence of comorbidities such as diabetes (40%), prior myocardial infarction (MI) (69%), and acute coronary syndrome (74%) at presentation. SVG-PCI procedures commonly involved multiple DES (41%). Native vessel PCI, in addition to SVG-PCI, was performed in only 13% of procedures. At 1 year, adverse clinical outcomes were frequent as exemplified by any death (9.2%), MI (9.1%), or revascularization (21.1%), whereas stent and lesion-related outcomes on a patient level were less common: stent thrombosis (1.2%), in-stent restenosis (4.3%) and target lesion revascularization (4.3%). Similarly, at 3 years, clinical outcomes were frequent: death (19.8%), MI (21.1%), revascularization (32.8%); and stent-related outcomes were less common: stent thrombosis (2.9%), restenosis (10.8), and target lesion revascularization (13.6%). ConclusionsIn this nationwide cohort of patients who underwent SVG-PCI with contemporary DES, patients were characterized by a high-risk profile and high rates of adverse clinical events. However, the incidence of stent and lesion-related events was low.

Long-term results of percutaneous coronary intervention in no-touch vein grafts are significantly better than in conventional vein grafts.

Conventional vein grafts have a high risk of thrombosis and early atherosclerosis. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in conventional vein grafts is associated with a higher incidence of late adverse cardiac events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results after PCI in saphenous vein grafts (SVG) harvested with the no-touch technique compared to the conventional technique. This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study, based on data from the Swedeheart register. The inclusion criterion was individuals who underwent CABG using different vein graft techniques between January 1992 and July 2020, and who required a PCI in SVGs between January 2006 and July 2020. The primary end point was long-term in-stent restenosis. The secondary endpoints were long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and 1-year re-hospitalization rates. The associations between the graft types and the endpoints were evaluated using the Fine and Gray competing-risk regression analysis. The study included 346 individuals (67 no-touch, 279 conventional). The mean clinical follow-up time was 6.4years with a standard deviation of 3.7years. The long-term in-stent restenosis rate for the no-touch grafts was 3.2% compared to 18.7% for the conventional grafts (p < .01), with a subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) of 0.16 (p = .010). The long-term MACE rate was 27.0% in the no-touch group and 48.3% in the conventional group (p < .01) with a SHR of 0.53 (p = .017). The short-term results were similar in both groups. Percutaneous coronary intervention in a no-touch vein graft was associated with statistically significantly fewer in-stent restenoses and MACE at long-term follow-up compared to a conventional SVG.

A new predictor of coronary no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in saphenous vein grafts: Eisonophil

Introduction: Coronary no-reflow phenomenon is an important factor that causes increased mortality and morbidity in percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. How this happened is a subject that is still under investigation and has no clear answer. In this study, we examined the effect of eosinophil values in coronary no-reflow. Methods: The study was designed retrospectively. Four hundred four patients who underwent coronary bypass were included in the study; 153 in the no-reflow group and 251 in the regular coronary flow group. The relationship between eosinophil values and no-reflow was examined. Results: In the examination between no-reflow and eosinophil, there was a significant difference between the groups (p &lt;0.001), Multivariate analysis showed that presence of coronary stent (p = 0.001), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.001), neutrophils (P = 0.001), eosinophil (P = 0.001) were effective coronary no-reflow phenomena. Conclusions: Many factors play a role in developing no-reflow and eosinophil height among these factors. It should be kept in mind that no-reflow may develop if eosinophil elevation is present in coronary artery disease.

The relationship between the no-reflow phenomenon and the systemic immune-inflammation index in saphenous vein graft interventions

Aim: In our retrospective study, we examined patients who underwent percutaneous intervention (PCI) for ischemia involving saphenous vein grafts (SVG). Our objective was to analyze the impact of inflammation and thrombotic events on the no-reflow phenomenon (NRP) post-intervention. For this purpose, we aimed to determine whether the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) is a risk factor for the NRP. Patients were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of NRP, and we investigated whether there was a statistically significant difference in SII between the groups. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients who had previously undergone surgical revascularization and underwent PCI on SVG due to ischemia between May 4, 2023, and July 31, 2024. Post-procedural blood flow was evaluated, and patients were divided into two groups based on the development of NRP. The relationship between NRP and SII was examined. Results: The study demonstrated that patients who experienced the NRP had significantly higher SII levels. Additionally, the duration of the procedure was significantly longer in patients with no-reflow. Systemic risk factors, such as age, gender, and comorbidities, were similar between the no-reflow and normal flow groups. Conclusion: This study indicates that inflammation plays a key role in determining flow outcomes following PCI. Further clinical studies focused on reducing inflammation and improving flow are needed.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: A Case Report

Abstract: Recent published data from the Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) national database displayed that among patients aged &gt;65 years old who survived following an initial coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operation, rates of repeat revascularization at 1, 5, 10, and 18 years were 2%, 8%, 16%, and 25%, respectively. The most preferred mode of revascularization was percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While remain the most frequently used conduits beside left internal mammary artery (LIMA), saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) have high failure rates. Percutaneous coronary intervention in SVGs is associated with an increased risk of distal coronary embolization, commonly resulting in periprocedural MI. We reported a 79-year-old male patient admitted due to progressive symptoms of chronic coronary syndrome. The patient had a history of hypertension and a CABG surgery in 2012. Electrocardiogram showed ischemia and old myocardial infarction (OMI) in inferior leads as well as poor R wave progression in the precordial leads. Transthoracic echocardiogram displayed a normal ejection fraction but impaired left ventricular (LV) diastolic relaxation. Diagnostic coronary angiography revealed a 70% tubular stenosis in proximal part of SVG supplying posterior descending artery, patent LIMA graft to left anterior descending artery, and complex lesion on native vessel (chronic total occlusion in mid right coronary artery). Implantation of drug eluting stent in SVG-posterior descending artery was performed. Direct-stenting PCI technique using undersized-stent was done to prevent any complications. In conclusion, despite the high risk of complications, vein graft intervention was successfully performed without any complications. Since the high rates of in-stent restenosis following PCI in SVGs, long-term dual antiplatelet therapy should be commenced in this patient. Keywords: saphenous vein graft; vein graft intervention; percutaneous coronary intervention

The stress hyperglycemic ratio can predict the no-reflow phenomenon following saphenous vein graft intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

The no-reflow phenomenon (NRP) is a common complication of saphenous vein graft (SVG) interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) on the development of NRP in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous SVG intervention. The study included 223 patients who presented at our center with ACS, had a history of coronary artery bypass graft and underwent a saphenous graft procedure. The relationship between SHR calculated at the time of presentation from glucose and HbA1c values, and the development of NRP evaluated after the procedure with angiography was determined with univariate and multivariate binary regression analysis. The study population was separated into two groups as those who developed and did not develop NRP. Mean age was determined to be significantly higher in the group that did not develop NRP compared to the group with NRP (p: 0.004). Angiographically, the thrombus burden was determined to be significantly higher in the group that developed NRP (p < 0.001). Patients were separated into 3 tertiles according to the SHR level (T1, T2, T3), and the rate of NRP development was determined at a significantly higher rate in the T3 group (p < 0.001). This study showed that SHR, a parameter that can be easily calculated noninvasively, is an independent predictor of NRP development in ACS patients undergoing saphenous interventions. In addition, high thrombus burden and predilatation before stenting were also found to be factors that increase the likelihood of developing NRP.

The Relationship between CHA2DS2-VASc Score and Reperfusion Success in Elective Percutaneous Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions

The Relationship between CHA2DS2-VASc Score and Reperfusion Success in Elective Percutaneous Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention of great saphenous vein grafts in a patient with central and peripheral artery disease – how to approach?

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention of great saphenous vein grafts in a patient with central and peripheral artery disease – how to approach?

Real world single center experience with saphenous vein grafts interventions: should filters be filtered out?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) can be challenging due to no reflow phenomenon from distal embolization of debris and microvascular vasoconstriction, resulting in myocardial injury post-procedure. Guidelines promote the use of distal embolic protection devices (EPD) to protect the distal arterial bed during SVG PCI. However, this approach has shown less-than-optimal results in many studies. We report our data using the Borgess protocol [prophylactic intracoronary (IC) nicardipine injection and direct stenting], as an alternative to EPDs in a large series of SVG interventions. This is a retrospective, cohort study of our single center experience with SVG interventions between 2017 and 2021. The primary outcome of the study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [a composite of death, emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR)] at 30 days post-procedure. There were 424 consecutive SVG interventions performed during the study period, and 76% of cases presented with acute coronary syndrome. Full adherence to the Borgess protocol was observed in 36% of cases; IC nicardipine was utilized in 72% of cases. MACE rate was 3.5% at 30 days driven primarily by MI (2.6%). The Borgess protocol approach to vein graft interventions proved good outcomes when compared to SVG PCI in randomized trials utilizing EPDs. Our study is limited by the retrospective nature and single center experience.

One-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in native coronary arteries versus saphenous vein grafts in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

BackgroundPatients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery often require percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data are still limited in regards to the outcomes of native saphenous vein graft (SVG) PCI after CABG.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study in a tertiary reference cardiac center of consecutive patients who underwent PCI after CABG. The data were collected for patients who underwent either native or graft PCI from January 2008 to December 2018. Arterial graft PCIs were excluded. Multivariable Cox regression analysis with propensity matching was performed, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) outcomes including death or myocardial infarction (MI) or revascularization were assessed at 1-year after each index procedure.ResultsA total of 435 PCI were performed in 401 patients (209 had native PCI and 192 had graft PCI). Target lesions were classified as following: 235 (54%) native coronary arteries and 200 (46%) SVG. Propensity matching resulted in 167 matched pairs. In multivariable Cox regression graft PCI relative to native PCI was an independent risk factor for MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.725, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.049–2.837) which was primarily driven by increased incidence in revascularization (HR 2.218, 95% CI 1.193–4.122) and MI (HR 2.248, 95% CI 1.220–4.142) and with no significant difference in mortality (HR 1.118, 95% CI 0.435–2.870).ConclusionsCompared with native coronary PCI, bypass graft PCI was significantly associated with higher incidence of MACE at 1-year and this was mainly driven by MI and revascularization.

Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts is Significantly Better Than in Conventional Vein Grafts.

ObjectiveTo compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients primarily treated with a no-touch saphenous vein graft with that of patients who received a conventional graft.MethodsThe study included all individuals treated with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on a saphenous vein graft (SVG) between January 2006 and June 2020. The RAND-36 health survey was used to assess HRQoL. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to test differences in HRQoL between the two groups. Effect size was estimated via Cohen’s d. The average treatment effect between the groups was tested by propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsOf the 346 patients treated with a PCI in a stenosed or occluded SVG, 165 responded to RAND-36 (no-touch: n=48; conventional: n=117). Patients with a no-touch graft reported better mean values on seven of the eight health survey domains. Statistically significant differences were observed for four of the domains, all in favour of the no-touch group. The effect size estimates indicated a small difference for five domains, with the highest values (>0.40) seen for the general health and energy/fatigue domains. PSM confirmed a statistically significant difference for the physical functioning and general health domains.ConclusionAt a mean follow-up of 5.4 years, patients who received a PCI in no-touch vein grafts showed significantly better HRQoL than those who received a PCI in conventional vein grafts.

Percutaneous coronary intervention of totally occluded coronary venous bypass grafts: An exercise in futility?

BACKGROUNDPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of diseased saphenous vein grafts (SVG) continues to pose a clinical challenge. Current PCI guidelines give a class III recommendation against performing PCI on chronically occluded SVG. However, contemporary outcomes after SVG intervention have incrementally improved with distal protection devices, intracoronary vasodilators, drug-eluting stents, and prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. AIMTo reassess the procedural and long-term outcomes of PCI for totally occluded SVG with contemporary techniques.METHODSThis was a retrospective observational study conducted at a single university hospital. The study population consisted of 35 consecutive patients undergoing PCI of totally occluded SVG. Post-procedure dual antiplatelet therapy was continued for a minimum of one year and aspirin was continued indefinitely. Clinical outcomes were assessed at a mean follow-up of 1221 ± 1038 d. The primary outcome was freedom from a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) defined as the occurrence of any of the following: death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat bypass surgery, repeat PCI, or graft reocclusion. RESULTSThe study group included 29 men and 6 women with a mean age of 69 ± 12 years. Diabetes was present in 14 (40%) patients. All patients had Canadian Heart Classification class III or IV angina. Clinical presentation was an acute coronary syndrome in 34 (97%) patients. Mean SVG age was 12 ± 5 years. Estimated duration of occlusion was acute (< 24 h) in 34% of patients, subacute (> 24 h to 30 d) in 26%, and late (> 30 d) in 40%. PCI was initially successful in 29/35 SVG occlusions (83%). Total stent length was 52 ± 35 mm. Intraprocedural complications of distal embolization or no-reflow occurred in 6 (17%) patients. During longer term follow-up, MACE-free survival was only 30% at 3 years and 17% at 5 years.CONCLUSIONPCI of totally occluded SVG can be performed with a high procedural success rate. However, its clinical utility remains limited by poor follow-up outcomes.

Complications and failure modes of coronary embolic protection devices: Insights from the MAUDE database.

There is limited data on complications associated with the use of coronary embolic protection devices (EPDs). We queried the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database between November 2010 and November 2020 for reports on coronary EPDs: Spider FX (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) and Filterwire EZ (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA). We retrieved 119 reports on coronary EPD failure (Spider FX n = 33 and Filterwire EZ n = 86), most of which (78.2%) occurred during saphenous vein graft interventions. The most common failure mode was inability to retrieve the EPD (49.6%), with the filter trapped against stent struts in 76.2% of the cases. Other device complications included filter fracture (28.6%), failure to cross (7.6%), failure to deploy (7.6%), and failure to recapture the filter (3.4%). Filter fracture (54.5 vs. 29.1%) and failure to recapture (9.1 vs. 2.1%) were more commonly reported, while failure to deploy the filter (0 vs. 10.5%) was less commonly reported with the Spider-FX. The most common modes of failure of coronary EPDs are the failure of retrieval (49.6%), followed by the filter fracture (28.6%). When using EPDs, careful attention to the technique is essential to avoid failures and subsequent complications.

When 7 times angioplasty on Saphenous Vein graft would not compete the Native vessel Percutaneous Coronary intervention

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) has been the first option for revascularization in multiple vessel coronary artery disease. One of the most major obstacles after CABGs is atherosclerotic changes of SVGand more than 50 percent ofSVGare occluded at 10 years and 25 percent show severe stenosis at angiographic follow-up. Whether native vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on native vessel or saphenous vein graft intervention is of benefit in these patients is still a debate. In this case report we want to clarify a common clinical scenario in a patient with prior CABG seven years ago which a proper decision in the right time could save many futile efforts. The patient underwent 7 PCI on the diseased SVG on OM with frequent occlusion due to stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis which finally native vessel antegrade CTO PCI alleviated the problem and patient followed up 2 months after the procedure without any chest pain in his ordinary activities.

Plateletcrit may predict no-reflow after saphenous vein graft interventions in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Saphenous vein graft (SVG) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are procedures with potential complications such as distal embolization, slow or no-reflow phenomenon. Platelets are the main factors in development of thrombus and no-reflow phenomenon. There have been multiple studies that identified the association between plateletcrit (PCT) and cardiovascular outcomes. The aim of the study was to investigate whether PCT can predict the development of no-reflow in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing PCI for SVG disease. A total of 181 patients who underwent PCI for SVG disease with NSTEMI were included retrospectively. Platelet indices on admission were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups according to the development of no-reflow during the procedure: no-reflow (n = 32; 18%) and normal reflow (n = 149; 82%). PCT and platelet count were higher in the no-reflow group (0.254 vs. 0.224, P = 0.020; 265.4 vs. 233, P = 0.011, respectively). The PCT cut-off value for predicting no-reflow was calculated as 0.230 by ROC curve analysis with 68.8% sensitivity and 51.0% specificity. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PCT was an independent predictor of no-reflow (odds ratio: 5.091, confidence interval: 1.356-19.116, P = 0.016). PCT may be useful in identifying patients at risk for developing no-reflow in patient with NSTEMI undergoing SVG PCI.

CHA2DS2-VASc score as a predictor of no-reflow phenomenon after saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) is associated with an increased risk of complications, particularly no‑reflow phenomenon and distal embolization due to low patency rates. The CHA2DS2‑VASc score is a clinical risk stratification tool used to predict thromboembolism events especially in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the CHA2DS2‑VASc score and no‑reflow phenomenon after SVG PCI in patients with non-ST‑segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE‑ACS). In this study, we included 268 patients diagnosed with NSTE‑ACS who underwent PCI for SVG disease in our tertiary cardiovascular center. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 without no‑‑reflow phenomenon (n = 190) and group 2 with no‑reflow phenomenon (n = 78) following the intervention, and then compared based on CHA2DS2‑VASc scores. The CHA2DS2‑VASc score (P <0.001) was significantly higher in group 2, even though no significant difference regarding atrial fibrillation was observed between the study groups. The CHA2DS2‑VASc score (P <0.001), degenerated saphenous vein graft (P = 0.006), and intraluminal thrombus (P <0.001) were found to be independent predictors of no‑reflow phenomenon. Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that a CHA2DS2‑VASc score of 4 predicted no‑reflow phenomenon with 67.9% sensitivity and 69.3% specificity. Our findings suggest that the CHA2DS2‑VASc score can be an independent predictor of no‑reflow phenomenon in patients undergoing SVG interventions. As a simple and easy‑to‑calculate score, it might be a useful assessment tool to predict no‑reflow phenomenon before SVG interventions in patients with NSTE‑ACS.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Saphenous Vein Grafts in a Low to Middle-Income Country.

BackgroundRevascularization of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) is challenging and debated for the last few decades. The percutaneous revascularization of SVGs was reported to have poorer long-term outcomes than native coronary artery revascularization.PurposeWe aim to study the peri-procedural complications and long-term outcomes of the percutaneous revascularization of SVGs in a low-middle-income country.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we included 110 patients who underwent percutaneous revascularization from January 2011 to March 2020 and followed them retrospectively for long-term outcomes and major adverse cardiovascular events.ResultsThe mean age was 71 ±9, and 81% were male. The most common reason for the presentation was non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (46%). The mean follow-up period of the study was 48±27 months. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (86%). A drug-eluting stent (80%) was placed in most of the patients, followed by a bare-metal stent (BMS) (14%) and percutaneous balloon angioplasty (POBA) (6%). We did not find any significant difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (P=0.48), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (p=0.69), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (p=0.54) with drug-eluting stent (DES) as compared to either BMS or POBA. The mean period from coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to SVG percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was 15± 5.5 years. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event, stroke, and female sex were independently associated with MACE.ConclusionThe long-term outcomes of SVG PCI are not affected by the types of stents. Female gender, ACS, and stroke are the independent predictors of MACE after SVG PCI, and statin therapy has a positive impact on the long-term outcomes of SVG PCI.

Long-Term Results After Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BackgroundEfficacy data on drug‐eluting stents (DES) versus bare‐metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts are controversial. We aimed to compare DES with BMS among patients undergoing saphenous vein grafts intervention regarding long‐term outcome.Methods and ResultsIn this multinational trial, patients were randomized to paclitaxel‐eluting or BMS. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target‐vessel revascularization at 1 year. Secondary end points included major adverse cardiac events and its individual components at 5‐year follow‐up. One hundred seventy‐three patients were included in the trial (89 DES versus 84 BMS). One‐year major adverse cardiac event rates were lower in DES compared with BMS (2.2% versus 16.0%, hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03–0.64, P=0.01), which was mainly driven by a reduction of subsequent myocardial infarctions and need for target‐vessel revascularization. Five‐year major adverse cardiac event rates remained lower in the DES compared with the BMS arm (35.5% versus 56.1%, hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23–0.68, P<0.001). A landmark‐analysis from 1 to 5 years revealed a persistent benefit of DES over BMS (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13–0.74, P=0.007) in terms of target‐vessel revascularization. More patients in the BMS group underwent multiple target‐vessel revascularization procedures throughout the study period compared with the DES group (DES 1.1% [n=1] versus BMS 9.5% [n=8], P=0.013). Enrollment was stopped before the target sample size of 240 patients was reached.ConclusionsIn this randomized controlled trial with prospective long‐term follow‐up of up to 5 years, DES showed a better efficacy than BMS with sustained benefits over time. DES may be the preferred strategy in this patient population.RegistrationURL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00595647.