Real world single center experience with saphenous vein grafts interventions: should filters be filtered out?

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) can be challenging due to no reflow phenomenon from distal embolization of debris and microvascular vasoconstriction, resulting in myocardial injury post-procedure. Guidelines promote the use of distal embolic protection devices (EPD) to protect the distal arterial bed during SVG PCI. However, this approach has shown less-than-optimal results in many studies. We report our data using the Borgess protocol [prophylactic intracoronary (IC) nicardipine injection and direct stenting], as an alternative to EPDs in a large series of SVG interventions. This is a retrospective, cohort study of our single center experience with SVG interventions between 2017 and 2021. The primary outcome of the study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [a composite of death, emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR)] at 30 days post-procedure. There were 424 consecutive SVG interventions performed during the study period, and 76% of cases presented with acute coronary syndrome. Full adherence to the Borgess protocol was observed in 36% of cases; IC nicardipine was utilized in 72% of cases. MACE rate was 3.5% at 30 days driven primarily by MI (2.6%). The Borgess protocol approach to vein graft interventions proved good outcomes when compared to SVG PCI in randomized trials utilizing EPDs. Our study is limited by the retrospective nature and single center experience.