Background: There is essential demand for fine-tuning drug therapy esp. in the comorbid transplant patient (P) to contribute to improvement of long-term outcome after transplantation (TX). Tailored pharmacotherapy (TPHT) is a most important step of further post-transplant risk factor management because acute and chronic even vital risk resulting from polypharmacy reveals severely pronounced in this P group. Procedure: Synoptic scale of clinical pharmacology and internal medicine to elucidate acute and long-term pharmacological aspects for further algorithm in TPHT after TX. Advices are drawn from daily involvement in a broad spectrum of post-transplant challenges as in the severely acute intensive care unit P as well as in the cardiovascular and infectious disease and neoplasm affected long-term transplant P. A decade of experience in the fields of TX including review of updated literature is the basis of our attempt to define algorithm for TPHT. Resulting clinical pharmacological advices: Restriction to the essential therapeutic drug monitoring itself to avoid immunosuppressive risks does not sufficiently cover the individual P's requirements resulting from his comorbidities and organ status. All kind of comedication, transplant function, acute and chronic comorbidities, age of P, renal, hepatic and bone marrow function have to be focussed on pharmacologically to treat the individual P instead of addressing his diseases separately. Adverse drug effects and less familiar drug-drug interactions may become lifethreatening and thus have to be aware of continuously. We predominantly focus on adverse effects resulting from standard therapeutic regimen after TX. They themselves require accurate institution of further finetuned TPHT. Myelosuppressive prophylactic regimens are addressed. More agents shown result in alterations of trough levels of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) than we are familiar with. Being aware that incidence of hypertension is 60-80% in renal TX and knowing from literature that 50-60% of P die from cardiovascular deaths requires more effective and optimal antihypertensive posttransplant treatment. As Ca-channel blockers promote vasodilatation of afferent arterioles which may counteract CNI induced afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction this might be appropriate in the early hypertensive stage and preserve kidney as well. We focus on ACE inhibitors and on angiotensin-II receptor blockers reducing proteinuria, serum TGF-Ãβ1 and endothelin in P with CNI associated nephropathy. Switching to mTOR inhibitors or MMF may be beneficial in this context. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors always need dose adaption to renal function. Coadministration of azoles, macrolides plus sirolimus has to be avoided because of additive hepatotoxicity. Additive nephrotoxicity may result from CNI plus carbapenems or ACE-inhibitor plus NSAIDs. Switching from CNI to mTOR inhibitor with its antiproliferative effect may offer a potent option to overcome post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder avoiding life-threatening chemotherapy. Challenging responsibility: Tailored pharmacotherapy means 1) to know the individual P with his entire comorbidities and organ functions 2) to be familiar with the spectrum of different strategic options of pharmacotherapy including all associated interactive and adverse effects 3) to consider both continuously in synoptic view to achieve optimal treatment in each individual P. To afford adequate protection of P and transplant tailored pharmacotherapy should be guaranteed as an important treatment concept.