You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Superficial II1 Apr 20101475 QUALITY OF CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH HIGH-GRADE NON-MUSCLE-INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER Karim Chamie, Christopher Saigal, Jan Hanley, Badrinath Konety, Mark Litwin, and Urologic Diseases in America Projectb Karim ChamieKarim Chamie Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author , Christopher SaigalChristopher Saigal Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author , Jan HanleyJan Hanley Santa Monica, CA More articles by this author , Badrinath KonetyBadrinath Konety Minneapolis, MN More articles by this author , Mark LitwinMark Litwin Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author , and Urologic Diseases in America Projectb More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1190AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Best practice guidelines that address surveillance, staging and treatment strategies for patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer have been established to minimize tumor recurrence and progression. We sought to determine the frequency of adherence and identify the variables that drive compliance with these guidelines. METHODS Using linked SEER-Medicare data, we identified 8,513 patients with an incident diagnosis of high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer from 1992 to 2002. The dependent variables included surveillance cystoscopy, urine cytology, upper tract imaging, and the use of intravesical therapy— Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and Mitomycin C. The independent variables included age, gender, race, marital status, patient comorbidities, and SEER registry. The American Urological Association, European Association of Urology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were used to generate the surveillance, staging and treatment strategies for patients with bladder cancer. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to measure associations between the independent variables and the surveillance, staging and treatment strategies. RESULTS Compliance was strongest for upper tract imaging (98%) and lowest for postoperative Mitomycin C (3%)(Table 1). Approximately 15% and 22% of patients underwent the recommended surveillance cystoscopies and urine cytologies, respectively. Approximately 39% of patients received at least a single dose of BCG therapy, with only 12% receiving all six instillations. Sociodemographic factors (age, race and marital status) were independently associated with variation in adherence to surveillance (cystoscopy and urine cytology) and treatment strategies (Mitomycin and BCG intravesical instillations). Comorbidity was associated with variation in surveillance but not treatment strategies. Table 1. Univariate analysis of the association between sociodemographic factors and surveillance, staging and treatment strategies for patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Variables Cystoscopy Cytology Upper Tract Imaging Mitomycin C BCG Age 65 - 70 17% 30% 98% 3% 11% 71 -75 18% 26% 98% 3% 12% 76 - 80 15% 24% 98% 2% 13% >80 10% 14% 98% 2% 8% p-value <0.001 p-value <0.001 p-value 0.73 p-value 0.03 p-value <0.001 Gender Male 14% 22% 98% 3% 11% Female 16% 22% 98% 2% 11% p-value 0.13 p-value 0.37 p-value 0.89 p-value 0.18 p-value 0.02 Race White 15% 23% 98% 3% 11% Black 9% 25% 99% 3% 9% Hispanic 12% 19% 97% 2% 11% Other 19% 14% 99% 6% 13% p-value 0.006 p-value 0.001 p-value 0.48 p-value 0.003 p-value 0.15 Marital Status Married 16% 24% 98% 3% 11% Other 12% 19% 98% 2% 10% p-value <0.001 p-value <0.001 p-value 0.76 p-value 0.04 p-value <0.001 Comorbidity 0 17% 24% 97% 3% 11% 1 13% 21% 98% 3% 11% ≥2 9% 16% 99% 3% 9% p-value <0.001 p-value <0.001 p-value <0.001 p-value 0.77 p-value 0.13 CONCLUSIONS Evidence from best practice guidelines is derived from randomized control trials (RCT), observational studies and from expert opinions. While many patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer do not receive the care as recommended by these guidelines, the greatest deficiency is from those that have been shown to reduce recurrence and progression in RCT (intravesical therapy). © 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e568-e569 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Karim Chamie Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author Christopher Saigal Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author Jan Hanley Santa Monica, CA More articles by this author Badrinath Konety Minneapolis, MN More articles by this author Mark Litwin Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author Urologic Diseases in America Projectb More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract