Endurance athletes usually achieve performance peaking with 2-4weeks of overload training followed by 1-3weeks of tapering. With a tight competition schedule, this may not be appropriate. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the effect of a compressed variant of the recommended overload and tapering approach (EXP; n=9, VO2peak =77±5mL·min-1 ·kg-1 ) with a 11-day traditional taper that maintained the usual frequency of high-intensity aerobic interval training (HIT) and reduced the duration of training at lower exercise intensity (TRAD, n=8, VO2peak =74±4mL·min-1 ·kg-1 ) on physiological and psychological variables of endurance performance. EXP performed a 6-day period with daily HIT followed by a 5-day step taper. Testing was performed before the intervention (pre), on the 7th (post-1), and on the 11th day of the intervention (post-2). From pre to post-2, EXP achieved a larger relative improvement than TRAD in VO2peak (4.0±3.7% vs 0.8±1.8%, respectively, P=.041) and the 1-min peak power output from the VO2peak test (5.0±3.6% vs 0.9±1.5%, respectively, P=.009) and had a tendency toward larger improvement in power output at a blood lactate concentration of 4mmol∙L-1 (P=.088) and peak isokinetic knee extension (P=.06). The effect size of the relative improvement in the endurance variables revealed a moderate-to-large effect of EXP vs TRAD. In conclusion, this study indicates that elite cyclists performing the present 11-day compressed performance peaking protocol consisting of a 6-day HIT overload followed by a 5-day step taper are superior to a 11-day taper only.
Read full abstract