AbstractThe present study examines the thermal characteristics and stresses at the boundary for peristaltic motion of Reiner‐Philippoff fluid through a symmetric channel. The Reiner‐Philippoff (R‐P) fluid model is widely recognized for its ability to provide a comprehensive representation of the unique properties exhibited by non‐Newtonian fluids. One notable aspect that initiates this model is the nonlinear relationship between velocity gradient and shear stress. Moreover, this model captures the implicit connection between deformation rate and stress. Additionally, the R‐P fluid model exhibits distinct characteristics, acting as a dilatant fluid for , exhibiting pseudoplastic behavior for , and behaving as a Newtonian fluid when . Governing equations are mathematically modeled under the consideration of mixed convection, viscous dissipation, magnetic field, and Joule heating effects. Long wavelength and small Reynolds number approximations are used to simplify the system. To compute the numerical solution of the simplified nonlinear system, BVP4c technique is employed via MATLAB. The influences of key parameters on Reiner‐Philippoff fluid flow are physically visualized through graphs. A detailed analysis of heat transfer for dilatant, pseudoplastic, and Newtonian fluids is also provided. Additionally, numerical assessments of heat transfer and stresses at the wall are presented via tables. Outcomes reveal that the temperature profile decreases due to R‐P fluid parameter and Bingham number. The findings for the pseudoplastic case indicate that both the enhanced Grashof and Hartmann numbers lead to an increase in the temperature profile. Tabular results indicate that rate of thermal transfer is improved by developing values of Grashof and Brinkman numbers, while stresses at the wall exhibit the opposite behavior. Additionally, the wall stresses decrease with greater values of R‐P fluid parameter and the Bingham number. Furthermore, dilatant fluid is more effective for improving thermal transfer and reducing stresses at the wall compared to Newtonian and pseudoplastic fluids.
Read full abstract