Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy Research Articles

Role of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Refractory and Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Pediatric Case Series.

Status epilepticus is a life-threatening condition that is defined as refractory (RSE) when the seizure activity continues despite treatment with benzodiazepine and a second appropriate treatment. Super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is an RSE that persists or recurs for ≥24 h. Few papers have reported the outcomes of pediatric patients affected by RSE and SRSE and treated with neuromodulation therapies. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an approved treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. We present our findings of pediatric patients treated with VNS for RSE/SRSE. We present a case series of seven consecutive pediatric patients treated with VNS for SRSE since 2012 by a single surgeon in Monza and Padua. A rapid titration was started soon after implantation. We considered electroclinical data before and after VNS implantation and at the last follow-up. We achieved the resolution of SRSE in five out of seven patients in a mean time of two weeks. At the last follow-up, these patients had a significant reduction of seizure burden without any relapse of SE. Based on our limited findings, we discuss the potential role of VNS therapy in similar but distinct clinical contexts. For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and RSE/SRSE, prompt VNS consideration is suggested, offering rapid responses and potentially reducing pharmacological load. Meanwhile, in NORSE/FIRES, we suggest early neuromodulation during the acute phase if standard treatments prove ineffective or not tolerated. This approach may leverage VNS's potential anti-inflammatory effects and neuromodulation, enhancing patient-specific treatments. Expanding case studies and prolonged follow-ups are recommended to strengthen these clinical insights.

Abstract 18085: Effect of Therapies on Quality of Life in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire is a validated tool to assess quality of life in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) Hypothesis: We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of therapies on improvement in MLWHF; analyzed across randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of drug based therapy, device based therapy, autonomic modulation, and exercise. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE for RCTs measuring MLWHF at baseline and follow-up in patients with HFrEF. Primary outcome was improvement in MLWHF. Meta-analysis was stratified in groups based on medical therapy, device based therapy (cardiac resynchronization therapy and cardiac contractility modulation), autonomic modulation (vagus nerve stimulation and baroreflex activation therapy), and exercise. Mean difference (MD) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were reported across multiple studies included in meta-analysis. Results: A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. Analysis showed statistically significant improvement in MLWHF at follow-up for drug based therapy (MD: -2.77; 95% CI: -5.10, -0.44) (Panel A), device based therapy (MD: -6.86; 95% CI: -9.60, -4.12) (Panel B), autonomic modulation (MD: -15.21; 95% CI: - 19.25, -11.17) (Panel C), and exercise group (MD: -10.05; 95% CI: -16.66, -3.43) (Panel D). Sub-group analyses based on various treatment modalities showed statistically significant improvement in MLWHF at follow-up for cardiac resynchronization therapy (MD: -8.11; 95% CI: -11.88, -4.33), cardiac contractility modulation (MD: -5.47; 95% CI: -9.46, -1.49), and baroreflex activation therapy (MD: -19.79; 95% CI: -24.90, -14.67). Conclusions: Drug based therapy, device based therapy, autonomic modulation, and exercise are associated with improvement in quality of life in patients with HFrEF.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Must Occur During Tactile Rehabilitation to Enhance Somatosensory Recovery.

Chronic sensory loss is a common and undertreated consequence of many forms of neurological injury. Emerging evidence indicates that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) delivered during tactile rehabilitation promotes recovery of somatosensation. Here, we systematically varied the timing of VNS relative to tactile rehabilitation to determine the paradigm that yields the greatest degree of somatosensory recovery after peripheral nerve injury (PNI). The medial and ulnar nerves in rats were transected, causing chronic sensory loss. Eight weeks after injury, rats were given a VNS implant followed by four weeks of tactile rehabilitation sessions consisting of repeated mechanical stimuli to the previously denervated forepaw. Rats received VNS before, during, or after tactile rehabilitation. Delivery of VNS during rehabilitative training generates robust, significant recovery compared to rehabilitative training without stimulation (56±14% improvement over sham stimulation). A matched amount of VNS before training, immediately after training, or two hours after training is significantly less effective than VNS during rehabilitative training and fails to improve recovery compared to rehabilitative training alone (5±10%, 4±11%, and -7±22% improvement over sham stimulation, respectively). These findings indicate that concurrent delivery of VNS during rehabilitative training is most effective and illustrate the importance of considering stimulation timing for clinical implementation of VNS therapy.

Vagus nerve stimulation for treating developmental and epileptic encephalopathy in young children.

To investigate the clinical variables that might predict the outcome of developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) after vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy and identify the risk factors for poor long-term outcome. We retrospectively studied 32 consecutive children with drug-resistant DEE who had undergone VNS surgery from April 2019 to July 2021, which were not suitable for corpus callosotomy. In spite of combining valproic acid, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, topiramate, etc. (standard anti-seizure medicine available in China) it has not been possible to effectively reduce seizures in the population we investigate (Cannabidiol and brivaracetam were not available in China). A responder was defined as a frequency reduction decrease > 50%. Seizure freedom was defined as freedom from seizures for at least 6 months. Sex, electroencephalograph (EEG) group, neurodevelopment, time lag, gene mutation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and epilepsy syndrome were analyzed with Fisher's exact test, The age at onset and age at VNS therapy were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test, statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. And used the effect size to correction. Among the 32 patients, the median age at VNS implantation was 4.7 years (range: 1-12 years). At the most recent follow-up, five children (15.6%) were seizure-free and 22 (68.8%) were responders. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the responders were significantly associated with mild development delay/intellectual disability (p = 0.044; phi coefficient = 0.357) and a multifocal EEG pattern (p = 0.022; phi coefficient = -0.405). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses demonstrated that a multifocal EEG pattern (p = 0.049) and DEE without epileptic spasm (ES) (p = 0.012) were statistically significant (p = 0.030). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that DEE with ES had significant predictive value for poor long-term outcome (p = 0.014, hazard ratio = 5.433, confidence interval = 1.402-21.058). Our study suggested that VNS was a generally effective adjunct treatment for DEE. Although the predictive factors for VNS efficacy remain unclear, it should be emphasized that patients with ES are not suitable candidates for epilepsy surgery. Further investigations are needed to validate the present results.

Self-administered non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation therapy for severe pharmacoresistant restless legs syndrome: outcomes at 6 months.

Severe pharmacoresistant restless legs syndrome (RLS) is difficult to manage and a source of suffering to patients. We studied the effectiveness at 6 months of an innovative treatment: transauricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in the left cymba concha in a case series of 15 patients, 53% male, mean (SD) age 62.7 (12.3) years with severe pharmacoresistant RLS (mean [SD] International Restless Legs Rating Scale [IRLS] score of 31.9 [2.9]) at baseline. Following an 8-week non-randomised hospital-based study with eight 1-h sessions of taVNS, patients were trained to administer taVNS at home and were followed up for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the IRLS score, secondary outcome measures were quality of life, mood disorders using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD) subscales for depression (HADD) and anxiety (HADA). At the 6-month follow-up 13/15 patients continued to use weekly taVNS. Symptom severity decreased (mean [SD] IRLS score 22.2 [9.32] at 6 months, p = 0.0005). Four of the 15 patients had an IRLS score of <20 at 6 months and two an IRLS score of 5. Quality of life significantly improved compared to baseline (mean [SD] score at baseline 49.3 [18.1] versus 65.66 [22.58] at 6 months, p = 0.0005) as did anxiety and depression symptoms (mean [SD] HADA score at baseline 8.9 [5.4] versus 7.53 [4.42] at 6 months, p = 0.029; and HADD score at baseline 5.2 [4.5] versus 4.73 [4.44] at 6 months, p = 0.03). Treatment was well tolerated, and no adverse events were reported. Our case series shows a potential role for self-administered taVNS in patients with severe pharmacoresistant RLS. Randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the utility of taVNS.

Optimizing Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a chronic, multisystem, inflammatory disease of autoimmune etiology occurring predominantly in women. A major hurdle to the diagnosis, treatment, and therapeutic advancement of this disease is its heterogeneous nature, which presents as a wide range of symptoms such as fatigue, fever, musculoskeletal involvement, neuropsychiatric disorders, and cardiovascular involvement with varying severity. The current therapeutic approach to this disease includes the administration of immunomodulatory drugs that may produce unfavorable secondary effects. This study explores the known relationship between the autonomic nervous system and inflammatory pathways to improve patient outcomes by treating autonomic nervous system dysregulation in patients via noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation. In this study, data including biomarkers, physiological signals, patient outcomes, and patient quality of life are being collected and analyzed. After completion of the clinical trial, a computer model will be developed to identify the biomarkers and physiological signals related to lupus activity in order to understand how they change with different noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation frequency parameters. Finally, we propose building a decision support system with integrated noninvasive wearable technologies for continuous cardiovascular and peripheral physiological sensing for adaptive, patient-specific optimization of the noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation frequency parameters in real time. The protocol was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transauricular vagus nerve stimulation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. This multicenter, national, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study will recruit a minimum of 18 patients diagnosed with this disease. Evaluation and treatment of patients will be conducted in an outpatient clinic and will include 12 visits. Visit 1 consists of a screening session. Subsequent visits up to visit 6 involve mixing treatment and evaluation sessions. Finally, the remaining visits correspond with early and late posttreatment follow-ups. On November 2022, data collection was initiated. Of the 10 participants scheduled for their initial appointment, 8 met the inclusion criteria, and 6 successfully completed the entire protocol. Patient enrollment and data collection are currently underway and are expected to be completed in December 2023. The results of this study will advance patient-tailored vagus nerve stimulation therapies, providing an adjunctive treatment solution for systemic lupus erythematosus that will foster adoption of technology and, thus, expand the population with systemic lupus erythematosus who can benefit from improved autonomic dysregulation, translating into reduced costs and better quality of life. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05704153; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05704153. DERR1-10.2196/48387.

Baseline characteristics of a European patient population with difficult-to-treat depression (RESTORE-LIFE) treated with adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder is a complex heterogeneous disorder. Treatment is especially challenging for patients with “difficult-to-treat depression” (DTD): a less stigmatizing and more clinically relevant framework defining depression that continues to cause significant burden despite usual treatment efforts. MethodsRESTORE-LIFE is a prospective, observational, multicenter, post-market study being conducted in Europe and is designed to reflect real-world clinical application of adjunctive Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy (VNS) for DTD. Baseline characteristics of RESTORE-LIFE patients were analyzed and compared to published treatment-resistant depression (TRD) trials. ResultsThis analysis includes the initial 98 RESTORE-LIFE patients who commenced treatment with VNS. Patients had a mean of 11.4 failed anti-depressant treatments, 1.1 suicide attempts, 87 % had prior electroconvulsive therapy, and 36 % had an endocrine/metabolic comorbidity. On average, disease severity was comparable to that in TRD trials (n = 15,463). However, RESTORE-LIFE patients appear to have been experiencing DTD for a longer duration and their DTD was characterized by a lack of positive mental health and meaningfulness of life, to a greater degree than by excess of negative mood. Despite high comorbidity rates in RESTORE-LIFE, VNS implantation was performed safely with no discontinuations due to surgical adverse events. LimitationsRESTORE-LIFE enrolls any patient receiving adjunctive VNS for DTD. Prescription of VNS may be biased by differences in practices amongst sites and countries. ConclusionsThe present analysis offers insight into contemporary real-world use of VNS Therapy for DTD in Europe representing a comprehensive characterization of DTD and how this population may differ from those in the TRD literature.

Vagus nerve stimulation in refractory idiopathic generalised epilepsy: An Irish retrospective observational study

ObjectiveRefractory idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE; also known as genetic generalised epilepsy) is a clinical challenge due to limited available therapeutic options. While vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is approved as an adjunctive treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy, there is limited evidence supporting its efficacy for refractory IGE. MethodsWe conducted a single-centre retrospective analysis of adult IGE patients treated with VNS between January 2003 and January 2022. We analysed the efficacy, safety, tolerability, stimulation parameters and potential clinical features of VNS response in this IGE cohort. ResultsTwenty-three IGE patients were implanted with VNS between January 2003 and January 2022. Twenty-two patients (95.65%) were female. The median baseline seizure frequency was 30 per month (interquartile range [IQR]= 140), including generalised tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), absences, myoclonus, and eyelid myoclonia with/without absences. The median number of baseline anti-seizure medications (ASM) was three (IQR= 2). Patients had previously failed a median of six ASM (IQR= 5). At the end of the study period, VNS therapy remained active in 17 patients (73.9%). amongst patients who continued VNS, thirteen (56.5% of the overall cohort) were considered responders (≥50% seizure frequency reduction). Amongst the clinical variables analysed, only psychiatric comorbidity correlated with poorer seizure outcomes, but was non-significant after applying the Bonferroni correction. Although 16 patients reported side-effects, none resulted in the discontinuation of VNS therapy. SignificanceOver half of the patients with refractory IGE experienced a positive response to VNS therapy. VNS represents a viable treatment option for patients with refractory IGE, particularly for females, when other therapeutic options have been exhausted.

Effective Delivery of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Requires Many Stimulations Per Session and Many Sessions Per Week Over Many Weeks to Improve Recovery of Somatosensation.

Chronic sensory loss is a common and undertreated consequence of many forms of neurological injury. Emerging evidence indicates that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) delivered during tactile rehabilitation promotes recovery of somatosensation. Here, we characterize the amount, intensity, frequency, and duration of VNS therapy paradigms to determine the optimal dosage for VNS-dependent enhancement of recovery in a model of peripheral nerve injury (PNI). Rats underwent transection of the medial and ulnar nerves in the forelimb, resulting in chronic sensory loss in the paw. Eight weeks after injury, rats were implanted with a VNS cuff and received tactile rehabilitation sessions consisting of repeated mechanical stimulation of the previously denervated forepaw paired with short bursts of VNS. Rats received VNS therapy in 1 of 6 systematically varied dosing schedules to identify a paradigm that balanced therapy effectiveness with a shorter regimen. Delivering 200 VNS pairings a day 4 days a week for 4 weeks produced the greatest percent improvement in somatosensory function compared to any of the 6 other groups (One Way analysis of variance at the end of therapy, F[4 70] P = .005). Our findings demonstrate that an effective VNS therapy dosage delivers many stimulations per session, with many sessions per week, over many weeks. These results provide a framework to inform the development of VNS-based therapies for sensory restoration.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy System in pharmacoresistant epilepsy: A literature review

Abstract Epilepsy affects approximately 50 million of people worldwide and 30% of them are resistant to drugs. Neuromodulation is becoming a key option in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not feasible for resective surgery. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is the most commonly used adjunctive neuromodulatory method in every patient aged 4 years and older who is unsuitable for resective surgery. It is a minimally invasive, non-teratogenic, extracranial pacemaker-like device which delivers electrical stimuli to the vagus nerve and desynchronize aberrant cerebral rhythms involved in epileptogenesis. In this review we approached the information and clinical data of VNS development history, clinical applications and possible mechanism of action. We will also review optimal stimulation parameters and information about closed and open loop devices. Vagus nerve stimulation is safe, efficient with no significant side effects and substantial cost-saving benefit, that also shows an important improvement in mood, behavior, cognition and quality of life. The overall responder rate was observed in more than 50% of patients. On the other hand, it is not clear which patients will respond to this method of treatment and why the response is not immediate, there are no available biomarkers or other features like age, sex, seizure type/epileptic syndrome to predict response to vagus nerve stimulation therapy. The VNS Therapy System continues to be an important prospect in the treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy, that requires further studies in order to ensure the most advantageous therapeutic response.

Functional brain connectivity indexes derived from low-density EEG of pre-implanted patients as VNS outcome predictors

Objective. In 1/3 of patients, anti-seizure medications may be insufficient, and resective surgery may be offered whenever the seizure onset is localized and situated in a non-eloquent brain region. When surgery is not feasible or fails, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy can be used as an add-on treatment to reduce seizure frequency and/or severity. However, screening tools or methods for predicting patient response to VNS and avoiding unnecessary implantation are unavailable, and confident biomarkers of clinical efficacy are unclear. Approach. To predict the response of patients to VNS, functional brain connectivity measures in combination with graph measures have been primarily used with respect to imaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, but connectivity graph-based analysis based on electrophysiological signals such as electroencephalogram, have been barely explored. Although the study of the influence of VNS on functional connectivity is not new, this work is distinguished by using preimplantation low-density EEG data to analyze discriminative measures between responders and non-responder patients using functional connectivity and graph theory metrics. Main results. By calculating five functional brain connectivity indexes per frequency band upon partial directed coherence and direct transform function connectivity matrices in a population of 37 refractory epilepsy patients, we found significant differences (p < 0.05) between the global efficiency, average clustering coefficient, and modularity of responders and non-responders using the Mann–Whitney U test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction procedure and use of a false discovery rate of 5%. Significance. Our results indicate that these measures may potentially be used as biomarkers to predict responsiveness to VNS therapy.

Predictive factors for successful vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy: real-life insights from a multicenter study.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy is an established treatment for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy that reduces seizure frequency by at least 50% in approximately half of patients; however, the characteristics of the patients with the best response have not yet been identified. Thus, it is important to identify the profile of patients who would have the best response to guide early indications and better patient selection. This retrospective study evaluated vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as an adjuvant therapy for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy from six epilepsy centers in Brazil. Data from 192 patients aged 2-66 years were analyzed, and all patients received at least 6 months of therapy to be included. Included patients were aged 2-66 years (25.6 ± 14.3), 105 (54.7%) males and 87 (45.8%) females. Median follow-up interval was 5 years (range, 2005-2018). Overall, the response rate (≥50% seizure reduction) after VNS implantation was 65.6% (126/192 patients). Most patients had 50-90% seizure reduction (60.9%) and nine patients became seizure-free. There were no serious complications associated with VNS implantation. The rate of a ≥ 50% seizure reduction response was significantly higher in patients with no history of neurosurgery. The presence of focal without generalized seizures and focal discharges on interictal EEG was associated with better response. Overall, etiological predictors of a better VNS response profile were tumors while a worse response to VNS was related to the presence of vascular malformations and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome. We observed an association between a better response to VNS therapy no history of neurosurgery, focal interictal epileptiform activity, and focal seizure pattern. Additionally, it is important to highlight that age was not a determinant factor of the response, as children and adults had similar response rates. Thus, VNS therapy should be considered in both adults and children with DRE.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Electrode Impedance Over Time in Children With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome

ObjectiveThis manuscript describes the behavior of impedance of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) electrode over time in a cohort of children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Materials and MethodsNineteen consecutive pediatric patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome submitted to VNS were studied. All patients had at least four years of follow-up. Serial impedance measurements were carried out during every out-patient visit. A baseline value was obtained one month after surgery, before generator activation and yearly values were recorded for the next four years. Outcome regarding seizures was obtained through analysis of standardized seizure diaries filled out by the patient, relatives, or caregivers. ResultsThere were 12 boys. Age ranged from four to 14 years (mean = 7.2). Mean impedance value was 2635 Ω at baseline, 2576 Ω after one year, 2418 Ω after two years, 2340 Ω after three years, and 2241 Ω after four years. There was a mean impedance decrease of 17% after four years. This decrease was statistically significant compared with baseline by the second year of follow-up: p = 0.342 after one year, p = 0.007 after two years, p = 0.001 after three years, and p = 0.001 after four years. There was no significant relationship between impedance values and seizure outcome at any time point. ConclusionsVNS electrode impedance significantly decreased during long-term follow-up in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. To our knowledge, this is the first report on such findings regarding VNS in the literature. These findings suggest that the electrode/nerve interface is stable during long-term follow-up of VNS therapy and that this preserved anatomical relationship might be related to our ability to safely stimulate and review/explant the system whenever needed.

Chronic vagus nerve stimulation in patients with heart failure: challenge or failed translation?

Autonomic imbalance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems contributes to the progression of chronic heart failure (HF). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that various neuromodulation strategies may exert beneficial cardioprotective effects in preclinical models of HF. Based on these encouraging experimental data, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been assessed in patients with HF with a reduced ejection fraction. Nevertheless, the main trials conducted thus far have yielded conflicting findings, questioning the clinical efficacy of VNS in this context. This review will therefore focus on the role of the autonomic nervous system in HF pathophysiology and VNS therapy, highlighting the potential reasons behind the discrepancy between preclinical and clinical studies.

ASCEND: A randomized controlled trial of titration strategies for vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy

Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) therapy is widely understood to provide clinically meaningful improvements in seizure control to patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, and has been a staple in the clinical armamentaria available to epileptologists for over 25 years. Despite the long history of evidence-based reviews by neurology professional societies, there is still evidence of a practice gap in VNS titration and dosing that aims to maximize clinical benefit. Recent retrospective analyses have strongly argued for a more consistent application of a population-wide target dose of VNS, and further argued the importance of quickly achieving this target dose to hasten the onset of clinical benefits; however, these analyses failed to provide evidence for practical implementation. Herein, we describe a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of titrating VNS according to three different protocols to achieve the target dose of 1.5 mA at 500µsec, for a 20-Hz signal frequency. The study was registered as NCT02385526 on March 11, 2015. Sixty-two patients were randomized into treatment groups that followed different titration protocols. One protocol (Group A) was designed to align with currently accepted professional guidance for VNS titration and the manufacturer’s labeling for VNS in epilepsy (Heck et al., 2002), while the other two protocols were derived from VNS applications in other therapeutic areas. Group A participants were most likely to achieve the target dose parameters in 12 weeks or less (81.8%), with a median time-until-achievement of the target dose of 8.1 weeks, while less than 60% of patients in other groups were able to achieve the same endpoint. Participants in all groups experienced low levels of transient tolerability concerns and adverse events, suggesting titration to the target dose in 12 weeks or less following the Group A protocol is generally acceptable to most patients. These findings indicate that patients receiving VNS for epilepsy can achieve the manufacturer-recommended dose range in 12 weeks or less. A wider implementation of the approach will likely improve the clinical impact of VNS on seizure control and prevent undertreatment.

Histopathological changes in tissues surrounding vagal nerve stimulation generators: A retrospective analysis of revision surgeries.

Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is an effective treatment for patients with epilepsy, depression, and other neuropsychiatric conditions. Understanding the tissue changes associated with VNS devices is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and device development. This study aimed to investigate the histopathological changes in the tissues surrounding the VNS generator and explore potential correlations with clinical factors and battery performance. A total of 23 patients who underwent VNS generator revision surgery owing to battery depletion were included. Tissue samples from the areas surrounding the VNS generator were obtained and analyzed for histopathological changes. Demographic and device-related variables were also recorded. Capsule formation was observed in all patients. Acute inflammation were not detected in any case. Perivascular lymphocytic infiltration, foreign-body giant cell reaction (FBGCR), and calcification were observed in 8.7%, 26.1%, and 43.5% of patients, respectively. Crystalloid foreign body appearance was noted in 4 patients. The median output current of the generator was higher in patients with lymphocytic infiltration than in those without lymphocytic infiltration. The median off time was higher in patients with skin retraction than in those without skin retraction. Moreover, discomfort was associated with the presence of FBGCR. Our study provides insights into the tissue changes associated with the VNS generator, with capsule formation being a common response. Crystalloid foreign body appearance was not reported previously. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between these tissue changes and VNS device performance, including the potential impact on battery life. These findings may contribute to VNS therapy optimization and device development.

Does response to vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy differ in patients with and without Lennox-Gastaut syndrome?

Literature on outcomes of patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) receiving adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) lacks information on seizure types and the time course of therapeutic effects. We have therefore performed what is to our knowledge the largest and most in-depth analysis of the effectiveness of VNS in LGS patients paying special attention to the impact of VNS Therapy on individual seizure types. The VNS Therapy Outcomes Registry includes over 7000 patients. A propensity score matching method was employed to match patients with LGS to non-LGS patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Overall seizure frequencies were assessed prior to implantation and at 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-ups to derive the main study outcomes: response rates and time to first response. A total of 564 LGS patients with sufficient data were identified in the registry and matched 2:1 to 1128 non-LGS patients. Responder rates at 24 months were 57.5% in the LGS group and 61.5% in the non-LGS group. Median seizure frequency reduction at 24 months was 64.3% versus 66.7% in the LGS versus non-LGS group, respectively. In both groups, VNS was most effective at reducing focal aware seizures, "other" seizures, generalized-onset non-motor seizures, and drop attacks with relative reduction rates for these seizure types at 24 months exceeding 90% in both groups. Time-to-first response did not differ between the groups; however, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients who regressed from bilateral tonic-clonic (BTC) seizure response in the LGS group versus the non-LGS group at 24 months: 22.4% versus 6.7%; p=.015. Although limited by its retrospective design, the study shows that the effectiveness of VNS is comparable in DRE patients with and without LGS; however, LGS patients may be more prone to fluctuating control of BTCs.

1019 New onset OSA after long term Vagus Nerve Stimulator implantation in a patient with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A case report

Abstract Introduction Implantable vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established treatment for drug resistant epilepsy. New onset obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a rare side effect of VNS. There are few studies describing VNS induced sleep apnea in adults. [1-2] A study of 16 patients with drug-refractory epilepsy found 5 patients with normal AHI develop mild OSA after VNS treatment for 3 months. [2] However, no literature exists regarding OSA after long term VNS implantation. Untreated OSA in patients with epilepsy can impact epilepsy outcomes. We report a case of new onset OSA after long term VNS implantation, refractory to PAP therapy. Report of case(s) A 36 year-old man with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome presented with gasping during sleep and daytime hypersomnolence. He underwent VNS implantation at the age of 12. A prior PSG in 2018 showed no sleep apnea. Repeat PSG showed VNS-induced OSA (AHI 10.1/hour). After failed CPAP titration, BPAP-S at 25/16 cm H2O improved OSA. Review of therapy data on follow up showed AHI of 13.7/hour and CAI of 10.9/hour, which is concerning for treatment induced central sleep apnea on BPAP. Diagnostic study with VNS turned off revealed mild OSA (AHI 5.8/hour). A multidisciplinary approach involving ENT for drug-induced sleep endoscopy to optimize VNS stimulation parameters along with neurology and sleep involvement is planned. The optimized VNS setting could be used during planned sleep times using a VNS device with dual-programming capability. Conclusion To our knowledge, there is no literature on development of sleep apnea after long term VNS implantation. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, VNS can cause sleep apnea or worsen sleep apnea in patients with a preexisting diagnosis. [1] This case demonstrates need for continuous monitoring and screening for sleep apnea in patients who have been implanted with VNS, even if baseline and follow up PGSs are normal. Current literature suggests discontinuation of VNS to resolve VNS-induced OSA, but we describe a case here where VNS is needed for ongoing management of epilepsy. Further studies are needed to identify treatment options for patients that cannot discontinue VNS therapy who also cannot be successfully treated with PAP if they develop VNS-induced OSA. Support (if any)

Brain functional connectivity-based prediction of vagus nerve stimulation efficacy in pediatric pharmacoresistant epilepsy.

Although vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a common and widely used therapy for pharmacoresistant epilepsy, the reported efficacy of VNS in pediatric patients varies, so it is unclear which children will respond to VNS therapy. This study aimed to identify functional brain network features associated with VNS action to distinguish VNS responders from nonresponders using scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) data. Twenty-three children were included in this study, 16 in the discovery cohort and 7 in the test cohort. Using partial correlation value as a measure of whole-brain functional connectivity, we identified the differential edges between responders and nonresponders. Results derived from this were used as input to generate a support vector machine-learning classifier to predict VNS outcomes. The postcentral gyrus in the left and right parietal lobe regions was identified as the most significant differential brain region between VNS responders and nonresponders (p < 0.001). The resultant classifier demonstrated a mean AUC value of 0.88, a mean sensitivity rate of 91.4%, and a mean specificity rate of 84.3% on fivefold cross-validation in the discovery cohort. In the testing cohort, our study demonstrated an AUC value of 0.91, a sensitivity rate of 86.6%, and a specificity rate of 79.3%. Furthermore, for prediction accuracy, our model can achieve 81.4% accuracy at the epoch level and 100% accuracy at the patient level. This study provides the first treatment response prediction model for VNS using scalp EEG data with ictal recordings and offers new insights into its mechanism of action. Our results suggest that brain functional connectivity features can help predict therapeutic response to VNS therapy. With further validation, our model could facilitate the selection of targeted pediatric patients and help avoid risky and costly procedures for patients who are unlikely to benefit from VNS therapy.

Microburst Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Safety and Efficacy Outcomes (S44.003)

Microburst Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Safety and Efficacy Outcomes (S44.003)