Use Of Extended Criteria Donors Research Articles

The role of extended criteria donors in liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is expected to become the leading indication for liver transplantation. Use of extended criteria donors (ECD) may help with donor allocation in these patients. The objective of this study was to determine the use of ECDs in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis undergoing liver transplantation to stimulate a liver-specific predictive model for ECD use. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify patients undergoing liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (2002-2014). Cox hazards models were created using (1) United Network for Organ Sharing ECD criteria (based on kidney allocation), (2) individual donor characteristics (age, sex, race, cause of death, body mass index, cold ischemic time), and (3) the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) to examine the effect of ECDs on mortality and graft failure. A total of 4,387 patients underwent liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; 1,359 (30.9%) patients received an ECD. Transplantation with ECD livers had comparable patient survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.23) between donor types but an increased risk of graft failure (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.36) compared to standard donors. Individual characteristics did not affect patient survival or graft failure. A 10% increase in KDPI was associated with a 28% increase in patient mortality (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.60) and 45% increase in graft failure (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.18-1.80). Based on the current United Network for Organ Sharing definition, ECDs in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis were associated with similar overall survival but increased risk of graft failure. Given the shortage of organs, creation of an easily calculated, liver-specific model similar to the KDPI may help risk stratify patients and improve organ allocation.

The use of extended criteria donors decreases one-year survival in high-risk lung recipients: A review of the United Network of Organ Sharing Database

ObjectiveThe study objective was to investigate the impact of matching donor quality to recipient severity on survival after lung transplant. MethodsBy using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing dataset, we analyzed lung transplant recipients from May 4, 2005, to December 31, 2012. By using adjusted Cox regressions, we identified extended criteria donors as those who had 1 or more of the following: age 65 years or more, smoking history of 20 pack-years or more, diabetes mellitus, or African-American race. All other donors were considered standard donors. Recipients were categorized by lung allocation score: lung allocation score less than 70 and lung allocation score 70 or greater. Our primary outcome was 1-year survival after lung transplantation. ResultsOf the 10,995 lung recipients, 3792 (34%) received extended criteria donor organs. Extended criteria donors were associated with an increased hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.56; P < .001). One-year survival was 87% and 82% (P < .001) for recipients with a lung allocation score less than 70 and 80% and 72% (P = .017) for recipients with a lung allocation score 70 or greater who received standard donor and extended criteria donor organs, respectively. In Cox regression models, the hazard of death was increased for recipients with a lung allocation score less than 70 + extended criteria donor (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.27-1.60; P < .001), recipients with a lung allocation score 70 or greater + standard donor (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10-1.71; P = .005), and was the highest for recipients with a lung allocation score 70 or greater + extended criteria donor (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.40-2.33; P < .001) compared with recipients with a lung allocation score less than 70 + standard donor. ConclusionsExtended criteria donors are associated with reduced 1-year survival, and recipients with a lung allocation score 70 or greater who receive extended criteria donor organs have the lowest survival.

Donor Age-Based Analysis of Liver Transplantation Outcomes: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Are Similar Regardless of Donor Age

The shortage of donor organs has led to increasing use of extended criteria donors, including older donors. The upper limit of donor age that produces acceptable outcomes continues to be explored. In liver transplantation, with appropriate selection, graft survival and patient outcomes would be comparable regardless of age. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1,036 adult orthotopic liver transplantations (OLT) from a prospectively maintained database performed between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2013. The study focus group was liver transplantations performed using grafts from older (older than 60 years) deceased donors. Deceased donor liver transplantations done during the same time period using grafts from younger donors (younger than 60 years) were analyzed for comparison. Both groups were further divided based on recipient age (less than 60 years and 60 years or older). Donor age was the primary variable. Recipient variables included were demographics, indication for transplantation, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), graft survival, and patient survival. Operative details and postoperative complications were analyzed. Patient demographics and perioperative details were similar between groups. Patient and graft survival rates were similar in the 4 groups. Rates of rejection (p = 0.07), bile leak (p = 0.17), and hepatic artery thrombosis were comparable across all groups (p = 0.84). Hepatitis C virus recurrence was similar across all groups (p = 0.10). Thirty-one young recipients (less than 60 years) received grafts from donors aged 70 or older. Their survival and other complication rates were comparable to those in the young donor to young recipient group. Comparable outcomes in graft and patient survivals were achieved using older donors (60 years or more), regardless of recipient age, without increased rate of complications.

Biomarkers to assess graft quality during conventional and machine preservation in liver transplantation

A global rising organ shortage necessitates the use of extended criteria donors (ECD) for liver transplantation (LT). However, poor preservation and extensive ischemic injury of ECD grafts have been recognized as important factors associated with primary non-function, early allograft dysfunction, and biliary complications after LT. In order to prevent for these ischemia-related complications, machine perfusion (MP) has gained interest as a technique to optimize preservation of grafts and to provide the opportunity to assess graft quality by screening for extensive ischemic injury. For this purpose, however, objective surrogate biomarkers are required which can be easily determined at time of graft preservation and the various techniques of MP. This review provides an overview and evaluation of biomarkers that have been investigated for the assessment of graft quality and viability testing during different types of MP. Moreover, studies regarding conventional graft preservation by static cold storage (SCS) were screened to identify biomarkers that correlated with either allograft dysfunction or biliary complications after LT and which could potentially be applied as predictive markers during MP. The pros and cons of the different biomaterials that are available for biomarker research during graft preservation are discussed, accompanied with suggestions for future research. Though many studies are currently still in the experimental setting or of low evidence level due to small cohort sizes, the biomarkers presented in this review provide a useful handle to monitor recovery of ECD grafts during clinical MP in the near future.

Ethical considerations surrounding survival benefit-based liver allocation

The disparity between the demand for and supply of donor livers has continued to grow over the last 2 decades, and this has placed greater weight on the need for efficient and effective liver allocation. Although the use of extended criteria donors has shown great potential, it remains unregulated. A survival benefit-based model was recently proposed to answer calls to increase efficiency and reduce futile transplants. However, it was previously determined that the current allocation system was not in need of modification and that instead geographic disparities should be addressed. In contrast, we believe that there is a significant need to replace the current allocation system and complement efforts to improve donor liver distribution. We illustrate this need first by identifying major ethical concerns shaping liver allocation and then by using these concerns to identify strengths and shortcomings of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease system and a survival benefit-based model. The latter model is a promising means of improving liver allocation: it incorporates a greater number of ethical principles, uses a sophisticated statistical model to increase efficiency and reduce waste, minimizes bias, and parallels developments in the allocation of other organs. However, it remains limited in its posttransplant predictive accuracy and may raise potential issues regarding informed consent. In addition, the proposed model fails to include quality-of-life concerns and prioritize younger patients. We feel that it is time to take the next steps toward better liver allocation not only through reductions in geographic disparities but also through the adoption of a model better equipped to balance the many ethical concerns shaping organ allocation. Thus, we support the development of a similar model with suggested amendments.

Intermediate Early Graft Function Is Associated With Increased Incidence of Graft Loss and Worse Long-Term Graft Function in Kidney Transplantation

IntroductionIntermediate early graft function is associated with increased incidence of graft loss and worse long-term graft function in kidney transplantation. BackgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is associated with premature graft loss, increased rate of allograft function decline, and greater incidence of acute rejection episodes (ARE). Regarding early intermediate graft function (IGF), these prognostic observations have not been clearly made. Our objective was to investigate the impact of IGF as compared with excellent graft function (EGF) on these outcomes. MethodsRetrospective analysis included all patients who underwent transplantation in a tertiary care center between 1989 and 2009. Definitions are as follows: DGF, need for dialysis in the first 7 days posttransplantation; EGF, serum creatinine (sCr) <3 mg/dL at 5 days posttransplantation; IGF, absence of dialysis need but with a sCr >3 mg/dL at 5 days posttransplantation. For univariate analysis we performed Student t test, Mann- Whitney test, or Chi-square test, as appropriate. For survival analysis we performed Kaplan-Meier method to determine survival curves and we used the log-rank test for comparison. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of IGF and of graft survival. ResultsFive hundred seventy patients were included: 69.0% had EGF, 22.6% had IGF, and 8.4% had DGF. Patients with IGF had worse graft survival at 5 and 10 years posttransplantation (75% vs 92% and 69% vs 85%, respectively; P < .001 for both comparisons) and higher incidence of ARE (41% vs 27%; P = .001), compared with EGF. In multivariate analysis, IGF was independently associated with an increased risk of graft loss compared with EGF (odds ratio [OR], 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32–4.35; P = .004]. Donor age (OR, 1.03 per year; 95% CI, 1.02–1.05; P < .001) was the strongest predictor of the occurrence of IGF. IGF was also associated with worse long-term graft function until 7 years posttransplantation (mean glomerular filtration rate [GFR] 48.3 ± 18.9 vs 57.4 ± 20.4 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = .008). ConclusionsIGF, as DGF, is associated with increased rates of graft loss and ARE, as well as worse long- term graft function. Donor age was the strongest risk factor for the occurrence of IGF. This is especially relevant regarding the increasing use of extended criteria donors.

Identification of Biomarkers to Assess Organ Quality and Predict Posttransplantation Outcomes

The increased disparity between organ supply and need has led to the use of extended criteria donors and donation after cardiac death donors with other comorbidities. We have examined the preimplantation transcriptome of 112 kidney transplant recipient samples from 100 deceased-donor kidneys by microarray profiling. Subject groups were segregated based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 month after transplantation: the GFR-high group (n=74) included patients with eGFR 45 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), whereas the GFR-low group (n=35) included patients with eGFR 45 mL/min or less per 1.73 m(2). Gene expression profiling identified higher expression of 160 probe sets (140 genes) in the GFR-low group, whereas expression of 37 probe sets (33 genes) was higher in the GFR-high group (P<0.01, false discovery rate <0.2). Four genes (CCL5, CXCR4, ITGB2, and EGF) were selected based on fold change and P value and further validated using an independent set of samples. A random forest analysis identified three of these genes (CCL5, CXCR4, and ITGB2) as important predictors of graft function after transplantation. Inclusion of pretransplantation molecular gene expression profiles in donor quality assessment systems may provide the necessary information for better donor organ selection and function prediction. These biomarkers would further allow a more objective and complete assessment of procured renal allografts at pretransplantation time.

144 Does Age Matter in Lung Transplantation?

With advances in immunosuppression, improvements in surgical technique, and use of extended criteria donors, patients previously considered ineligible for lung transplantation due to age are now undergoing these complex procedures with good outcomes. As the incidence of our aging population increases, we are likely to see more candidates over the age of 65 who are medically qualified for transplantation. Our study aims to quantify clinical graft outcome in terms of maximum % FEV1, the incidence and severity of PGD, and the overall survival of this patient population.

276 Paired Donor Lung Expression Suggest Key Effectors in Primary Graft Dysfunction

Donor selection practices have become more subjective as use of extended criteria donors has become more prevalent. The risk of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after lung transplantation significantly influences donor selection. We hypothesized that mRNA expression of donor organ injury transcripts prior to procurement would be associated with subsequent PGD.

Liver Graft Failure and Hyperbilirubinemia in Liver Transplantation Recipients After Clostridium difficile Infection

Introduction Liver transplant recipients are at high risk for Clostridium difficile infection. We have recently encountered multiple cases of CDI in our liver transplant recipients and for some of them it led to severe hyperbilirubinemia, liver failure, and even death. Our goals are to report our experience and analyze the factors that contributed to unfavorable outcomes. Material and Methods All liver transplant recipients diagnosed with CDI between December 1, 2007, and January 30, 2009, were included and retrospectively reviewed. Results Twenty-four patients were identified, 14 men and 10 women. Fourteen patients experienced hyperbilirubinemia after the infection and 7 progressed to liver failure. Pre-CDI biopsy-proven liver abnormality, use of extended-criteria donors (ECDs) and a donor risk index (DRI) greater than 1.9 were associated with a higher risk of graft failure ( P < .05). Hepatitis C, inpatient versus outpatient diagnosis, and a donor age greater than 50 years were not associated with a higher risk of graft failure. Use of ECDs and timing of the infection at more than 1 month but less than 1.5 years posttransplant were also associated with higher chances of sustained hyperbilirubinemia ( P < .05). Conclusion CDI in liver transplant patients can be very serious and may lead to sustained hyperbilirubinemia or graft failure. Marginal grafts are more susceptible to decompensate after such an infection than standard criteria grafts; moreover, already abnormal grafts do not tolerate this infection well and decompensate to complete failure in 85% of the cases.

Does the use of extended criteria donors influence early and long-term results of lung transplantation?

A best evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether the presence of extended criteria donors influences the early and long-term results in patients referred for lung transplantation. Of the 30 papers found using a report search, 14 presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date, country of publication, study type, group studied, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are given. In total, we recorded 10 retrospective studies that considered all the donor criteria for comparing marginal donors (MDs) and standard donors. On the one hand, six of them showed no difference between the two groups in terms of early and long-term results. On the other hand, four studies demonstrated a negative impact of MDs on various early outcomes (mortality, primary graft dysfunction, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in intensive care unit), whereas no significant negative influence on survival has ever been described when screening MD results. More precisely, when analysing the role of individual factors of marginality, as done in two of the 14 studies, a significant negative impact was observed for a low level of PaO(2) at the time of harvesting, positive bronchoscopy and smoking history. More specifically, the first two criteria have been validated by several authors, both in multicentre and cohort studies. Finally, the importance of avoiding the donation of the lung from an MD to a high-risk recipient emerged, whereas the association with single or bilateral transplants remains more controversial. Hence, current evidence suggests that there are no contraindications-given the absence of negative impact on survival-for the use of MDs for the transplant of a proposed standard receiver. However, given the low level of evidence of published studies, caution is necessary in order to avoid organ shortage, despite these encouraging results.

Pretransplant Hyponatremia Could Be Associated With a Poor Prognosis After Liver Transplantation

Introduction Predicting the prognosis of hepatic cirrhosis is the most accurate method to achieve a fair allocation among the liver transplant waiting list thereby reducing overall mortality rates. Aim To study the survival rates of recipients who undergo liver transplantation in association with hyponatremia rates. Methods This retrospective study used a prospectively collected database. The characteristics of liver donors and recipients were: age (years), Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD Na score, recipient body mass index (kg/m 2), warm ischemia time (minutes), cold ischemia time (minutes), intensive care unit time (days), hemocomponents transfused, recipient glycemia (mg/dL) and serum sodium (mEq/L), Child-Pugh-Turcotte classification (points), and survival time (months). We analyzed all 318 consecutive liver transplantations from February 1994 to May 2010 divided into two groups: A (Na > 130 mEq/L) and B (Na ≤ 130 mEq/L). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate survival rate and the Cox regression test to identify predictive factors. Results Hyponatremic patients displayed shorter survival ( P = .04). The Cox regression for survival time showed that patients with low serum sodium values (group B) had: Child-Pugh scores with 1.13% plus risk of death for each point; cold ischemia time with 1.001% less risk of death for each minute; glycemia with 0.6% for each mg/dL; 0.66% use of cell-saver; plus a risk of death for each 100 mL plus 1.02% risk of death for each year of donor age. Conclusion Hyponatremic cirrhotic patients show more advanced stages of disease compared to normonatremic cirrhotics. They usually display metabolic or cirrhotic decompensation and comorbidities. When these symptoms were associated with the use of extended criteria donors, increased cold ischemia time, and intraoperative bleeding, we observed lower survival rates.

Can the Preprocurement Pancreas Suitability Score Predict Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Graft Survival After Pancreas Transplantation?

Background Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is common after pancreas transplantation, leading to pancreatitis or thrombosis with the need for relaparotomy or even graft loss. Optimal donor selection may reduce the postoperative morbidity of IRI. The Eurotransplant preprocurement pancreas suitability score (P-PASS) seeks to identify ideal donors with a value <17. Owing to the organ shortage the waiting time for pancreas transplantation is increasing, a problem that may be addressed with the use of extended-criteria donors. We analyzed our pancreas transplantations regarding postoperative complications according to the P-PASS. To reflect IRI we used the peak C-reactive protein (CRP) levels during the first 3 postoperative days. Methods From January 2009 to July 2010, we transplanted 52 pancreas grafts, including, 50 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations (SPK), 1 after a kidney graft, and 1 alone. For 3 SPK donors the P-PASS was not available. All transplantations were performed using systemic venous and enteric drainage. The immunosuppression protocol included antibody induction with antithymocyte globulin and maintenance therapy with steroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. The peak CRP in the first 3 postoperative days was used as a marker for IRI. Results The mean P-PASS of our donors was 16.4 ± 2.6 (range, 12–22). We compared 24 patients receiving organs from “ideal” donors (P-PASS <17; ID) with 25 receiving grafts from extended-criteria donors (P-PASS ≥17; ED). There was no significant difference in the incidence of graft loss among ID versus ED grafts (20.8% vs 20.0%; P = 1.0). Comparing the rates of postoperative complications of patients, we did not observe a significant difference in graft thrombosis (4.2% vs 16.0%; P = .349), relaparotomy (29.2% vs 40.0%; P = .551), a pancreatic fistula (37.5% vs 28.0%; P = .543), or the length of hospital stay (36.5 ± 19.2 vs 37.4 ± 20.8 days; P = .875), respectively. Regarding IRI, there was no significant difference in peak CRP values (14.1 ± 5.5 vs 16.2 ± 6.0 mg/dL; P = .211). Conclusion This single center analysis failed to show that P-PASS significantly predicted pancreas graft survival, postoperative morbidity, or IRI severity. These findings suggested a chance to increase the donor pool using extended-criteria donors.

Comparison of Outcomes From Smoking and Nonsmoking Donors: Thirteen-Year Experience

Lung transplantation remains the best treatment option for a variety of end-stage lung diseases. Pressure on the limited donor pool has led to the use of extended criteria donors. One aspect of this has been the liberalization of the use of smoking donors (SmD). This study is a retrospective review of lung transplants performed between April 1995 and August 2008 at a single institute. We examined the impact of donor smoking on short-term and long-term survival in relationship to recipient and donor demographics such as ischemic time, cytomegalovirus status, rates of rejection and infection, ventilation, and intensive care stay. Endpoints were survival, infection, and rejection. During this 13-year period, 454 lung transplants were performed. Smoking history was available on 424 (93.4%) of these (SmD, n = 184; NSmD, n = 240). Seventy-one patients died within 3 months of transplant leaving 353 alive at 3 months posttransplant. Fatalities within the first 3 months were significantly higher in the SmD group (21% vs 13%, odds ratio 1.9, hazard ratio 3.3, p = 0.04). No significant difference in rejection and infection rates between recipients of lungs from SmD and NSmD at 3 months and at 1 year posttransplantation (p = 0.51 and 0.09) was found. Although recipients of lungs from SmD had higher odds of ventilation for more than 10 hours, the odds were only increased by 20%, which was not statistically significant. Recipients from SmD had significantly longer stays in the intensive care (odds ratio 1.9, p = 0.002). There was little evidence for an effect of SmD on the development of bronchiolitis obliterans. In this large cohort of patients, donor smoking history has an effect on early survival but no effect on long-term survival. The cause of this early mortality is independent of infection and rejection. However, these data suggest that overall outcomes from the use of donor lungs from smokers are acceptable, particularly in the current era with limited donor organs.

Invited Commentary

Lung transplantation, when used as the ultimate treatment for selected patients suffering from any form of benign, end-stage lung disease, is limited by the number of suitable brain-dead donors [1]. Various strategies have been applied to increase the potential lung donor pool, including living lobar transplantation, split lung transplantation, the use of extended criteria donors [2], as well as donors after cardiac death, or so called nonheart-beating donors [3].

Lung Transplantation With Grafts From Elderly Donors: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction Use of extended criteria donors is one of the strategies to face the scarcity of donors for lung transplantation. Methods Between November 2002 and May 2009, we performed 52 LTs in 50 recipients, 10 of whom (group A) received lungs from donors aged 55 years or older (median, 58.5; range, 56–66 years) for comparison with 28 patients (group B) transplanted with lungs from donors younger than 55 years (median, 25.5; range, 15–54 years). We excluded 9 children and 3 recipients of combined liver plus lung transplantations from the study. Results Recipient age, gender, and indications for transplantation did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Neither were there significant differences in PaO2/FiO2 ratios before lung retrieval, or length of the ischemic time The first PaO2/FiO2 on arrival to the intensive care unit (ICU) and the median length of ICU stay were similar. All patients, except 2 who died in the operating theatre, were extubated between 3 and 216 hours after the transplantation. Hospital mortality was similar in both groups: 3 patients in group A and 2 in group B ( P = .1). The median portions of the predicted 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1) at 6 months after transplantation did not differ in the 2 groups: 62.4% in group A versus 70% in group B ( P = .85). Conclusion Lung grafts from donors older than 55 years can be effectively used for transplantation, thus increasing the total organ pool.

Direct Anastomosis of the Donor Hepatic Artery to the Supraceliac Aorta without Extension Graft during Adult Liver Transplant in the Era of Extended Criteria Donors: Report of a Case

Arguably, one of the most challenging aspects of liver transplant surgery is the hepatic artery reconstruction. When the donor and recipient arteries are normal, this anastomosis can still be difficult. However, when the recipient artery has been dissected or is small other alternative reconstructions must be considered. Routinely, the donor surgery includes removing the iliac artery and vein specifically to aid in alternative reconstruction techniques. With the increase use of extended criteria donors (i.e., specifically age >55) the iliac vessel may be unusable because of atherosclerotic disease. This paper describes revisiting an alternative technique for hepatic artery reconstruction during cadaveric liver transplant when the recipient artery has been dissected and the iliac vessels were unusable secondary to arterial plaque from a 75 yo donor. Herein, we describe the successful anastomosis of the celiac artery with aortic patch from the donor directly to the supraceliac aorta of the adult recipient.

Liver transplantation from donors after cardiac death

Organ shortage limits the applicability of liver transplantation to treat end-stage liver disease, and the use of extended-criteria donors is a necessity in the current era. Donors after cardiac death (DCD) suffer irreversible cardiac arrest prior to donation and represent a potential source of additional organs if properly maintained. DCD undergo an initial period of warm ischemia that provokes cellular alterations. Experimental and clinical studies performed at our center have demonstrated that normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (NECMO) is effective at maintaining abdominal organs in DCD. NECMO helps stop and even revert some of the changes that occur during warm ischemia and offers the opportunity to evaluate graft viability prior to implantation. Nonetheless, the percentage of organs arising from DCD that are accepted for transplant remains relatively low due to the co-existence of other factors that prohibit their utilization, namely poor perfusion and hepatic steatosis. The use of dual-pump normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) in the ex vivo phase of DCD liver preservation can offer additional benefits over traditional cold storage. In experimental studies, ischemic injury and hepatocellular function are significantly improved in DCD grafts preserved with NMP. Clinical studies on the use of NMP in DCD liver transplantation are under way.

Donor-derived aspergillosis from use of a solid organ recipient as a multiorgan donor

The growing need for organs and the scarcity of donors has resulted in an increased use of extended criteria donors. We report a case where a recipient of a cardiac graft was used as an organ donor. Death of the recipient occurred 9 days after transplantation and was attributed to presumed cerebral hemorrhage, which post mortem was diagnosed as invasive aspergillosis of the brain. One recipient of a kidney transplant lost the graft due to infection with Aspergillus fumigatus, whereas prompt initiation of therapy successfully prevented disseminated aspergillosis in the other recipients. Despite the pressure to extend the use of organs by lowering the acceptance criteria, organs should only be accepted if the cause of death of the donors is unequivocally explained.

Usage and outcomes of deceased donor liver allografts with preprocurement injury from blunt trauma

The use of extended criteria donors is an effective way of reducing the shortage of deceased donor organs. Evidence of significant liver trauma in a deceased donor usually rules out transplantation of the liver. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use and outcomes of donor livers with preprocurement trauma. Records of all 312 deceased donors with a history of trauma between January 1986 and September 2007 were reviewed. Donors with macroscopic liver injuries were identified, and data from recipient medical records were obtained. Data on declined donor offers were also evaluated. The median donor age was 20 (range, 10-57) years, and 9 of 15 (60%) were male. The liver injuries were predominantly lacerations (grades 1-5) and vascular injury. The right lobe was resected because of extensive damage in 3 cases. This resulted in 2 left lobes (back-table cut-down) and 1 left lateral segment allograft (in situ split). For the 15 recipients, the median age was 43 (3-69) years. Primary nonfunction was not seen. There was no difference in survival between whole and partial allografts. Three deaths occurred within 3 months post-transplantation. During the same period, 42 of 1405 donor offers (3%) were declined because of extensive liver trauma or major ongoing intra-abdominal hemorrhage. In conclusion, the use of donor livers with preexisting trauma leads to acceptable outcomes. Strategies to deal with trauma include resection of the right lobe if required. Use of deceased donor livers with injury is a safe way to expand the donor pool.