The feature article by Ian Foster on “The Grid: A New Infrastructure for 21st Century Science” ( Physics Today 0031-9228 55 2 2002 42 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1461327. February 2002, page 42 ) presents well the structure and great potential of the Grid. At a time when government funding tends to focus on short-term returns that directly benefit society while overlooking basic physics research, Foster has reminded us that physics remains closely associated with important new, far-reaching technological developments.I think Physics Today missed an opportunity to deliver an important message with the publication of this fine article: Basic physics research, and basic science research in general, is often the driving force behind important developments in computing. In the European part of the world map (see Foster’s figure 4), the prominent role of CERN and of high-energy laboratories in Europe is obvious. Yet CERN (or its Large Hadron Collider) is briefly mentioned twice in the article, and only for its computing demands rather than for its contributions to the field.During the mid-1990s, when I was the adviser to the CERN director general on member state affairs, I had to rally support for the LHC among nonscientists. The expected computing technologies resulting from the LHC and the potential for broad application of those technologies were a strong selling point. I would tell my audience that each large detector must handle more than 1015 bytes of information per year, about a million times that contained in the human genome. This fact made an impression. At the time, given the existing technology, it was impossible to handle that amount of information. The use of CD-ROMs for storage would have required a 3-kilometer-high stack of them; processing the information would have required 50 000 PCs.But my experience has been this: Trust the physicists. By 2005, they will have found a way to meet the computing challenge, with resulting benefits for people from many walks of life. The detector collaborations, each with close to 2000 scientists, contain a vast number of highly competent people who freely exchange information and criticism. They know that, despite limited funding, they must be able to trade ideas and information and must have a successful system for that in place by the time the machine is completed.Now, several years later, the picture has already changed. By making the best use of improving hardware and networking, scientists can reduce the storage stack by a factor of 5, and reduce the number of computers needed for processing by even more. The Grid offers the possibility of greatly enhancing the available computing power for any specific need.Yet the capacity that LHC scientists will need has not been reached. Current technology, when fully used, already gives a factor of 10, but new developments to increase computing capacities by another factor of 10 are needed during the few years that remain before the LHC is commissioned. The Grid will play an important role in filling this need.I think that particle physics (and heavy basic science research) as the driving force behind computing developments cannot be overemphasized. Clearly, particle physicists are not alone in demanding new and highly efficient computing means. However, carefully planned projects in the past have often fallen short of expectations, whereas those technologies that arise spontaneously out of the computing needs of physicists have paid large dividends, usually at relatively low expense.Other arenas are motivating increases in computing power, particularly in the US, but particle physics has a specificity of its own. Very large amounts of data must be available simultaneously to a great many users. The number of physicists working coherently on the LHC will exceed 6000, scattered worldwide. These users will need both access to information and the ability to process it. The solution to this computing challenge, once implemented, will find many other applications.So I would like to end on a provocative note: If you want much better computing worldwide, remember to also invest in particle physics. The computing advances are likely to come faster and to be less expensive that way than through a more direct, top-down route.© 2002 American Institute of Physics.
Read full abstract