US Territories Research Articles

Sociodemographic and health risk factors associated with health-related quality of life among adults living in Puerto Rico in 2019: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundPuerto Rico, a US territory, faces numerous challenges adversely affecting public health, including poverty, a fragile healthcare system, inadequate infrastructure, a debt crisis, and vulnerability to climate change-related natural disasters. The impact of these factors on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure has not been comprehensively evaluated. Only two studies have assessed HRQoL, with the latest conducted in 2011, prior to recent events that could affect public health. This study aimed to assess the HRQoL and associated sociodemographic and health risk factors among adults living in Puerto Rico in 2019.MethodsPrevalence and 95% confidence intervals were used to describe HRQoL and its associations with sociodemographic and health-related variables among adults living in Puerto Rico who answered the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey (n = 4,944) in 2019. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to identify which of these variables were more likely to be associated with each of the four core HRQoL questions (HRQoL-4), expressed as prevalence odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals adjusted for potential confounders.ResultsThrough a comprehensive multivariable analysis, we uncovered significant risk factors – increasing number of chronic conditions, advanced age, and low income – associated with poor HRQoL among adults living in Puerto Rico. Specifically, our findings suggest that individuals with an increasing number of chronic conditions were more likely to report poor HRQoL across all 4 domains. As the number of reported chronic conditions increases by one, the odds of reporting having: fair/poor general health increased by a factor of 2.24 (POR: 2.24, 95% CI: 2.08–2.41), physical health impairment increased by a factor of 1.93 (POR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.78–2.08), mental health impairment increased by a factor of 1.90 (POR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.78–2.02) and activity limitation increased by a factor of 1.27 ( POR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.13–1.42). Advancing age was associated with all domains of poor HRQoL, except for the mental health domain for which we observed higher rates of poor HRQoL among the younger population (POR: 4.76, 95% CI: 2.4–9.1).ConclusionThis paper shows that the prevalence of poor HRQoL has not improved compared to the only previous study of HRQoL of Puerto Rico in the last decade. We also found that poor HRQoL is associated with having multiple chronic conditions in adults living in Puerto Rico. This may be a consequence of a decline in health services after natural disasters and socioeconomic downturns on the island. The study emphasizes the need for targeted interventions and ongoing monitoring of the population’s HRQoL over time to reach vulnerable subgroups, especially those with chronic conditions, advanced age, and low income, in order to reduce health disparities in Puerto Rico.

E-Cigarette Use Among US Adults in the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey

After the initial disruption from the COVID-19 pandemic, it is unclear how patterns of e-cigarette use in the US have changed. To examine recent patterns in current and daily e-cigarette use among US adults in 2021. This cross-sectional study used data from the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) database. The BRFSS is the largest national telephone-based survey of randomly sampled adults in the US. Adults aged 18 years or older, residing in 49 US states (all except Florida), the District of Columbia, and 3 US territories (Guam, Puerto Rico, and the US Virgin Islands), were included in the data set. Data analysis was performed in January 2023. The main outcome was age-adjusted prevalence of current and daily e-cigarette use overall and by participant characteristics, state, and territory. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted, applying weights to account for population representation. This study included 414 755 BRFSS participants with information on e-cigarette use. More than half of participants were women (51.3%). In terms of race and ethnicity, 0.9% of participants were American Indian or Alaska Native, 5.8% were Asian, 11.5% were Black, 17.3% were Hispanic, 0.2% were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 62.2% were White, 1.4% were of multiple races or ethnicities, and 0.6% were of other race or ethnicity. Individuals aged 18 to 24 years comprised 12.4% of the study population. The age-standardized prevalence of current e-cigarette use was 6.9% (95% CI, 6.7%-7.1%), with almost half of participants using e-cigarettes daily (3.2% [95% CI, 3.1%-3.4%]). Among individuals aged 18 to 24 years, there was a consistently higher prevalence of e-cigarette use, with more than 18.6% reporting current use and more than 9.0% reporting daily use. Overall, among individuals reporting current e-cigarette use, 42.2% (95% CI, 40.7%-43.7%) indicated former combustible cigarette use, 37.1% (95% CI, 35.6%-38.6%) indicated current combustible cigarette use, and 20.7% (95% CI, 19.7%-21.8%) indicated never using combustible cigarettes. Although relatively older adults (aged ≥25 years) who reported current e-cigarette use were more likely to report former or current combustible cigarette use, younger adults (aged 18-24 years) were more likely to report never using combustible cigarettes. Notably, the proportion of individuals who reported current e-cigarette use and never using combustible cigarettes was higher in the group aged 18 to 20 years (71.5% [95% CI, 66.8%-75.7%]) compared with those aged 21 to 24 years (53.0% [95% CI, 49.8%-56.1%]). These findings suggest that e-cigarette use remained common during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly among young adults aged 18 to 24 years (18.3% prevalence). Notably, 71.5% of individuals aged 18 to 20 years who reported current e-cigarette use had never used combustible cigarettes. These results underscore the rationale for the implementation and enforcement of public health policies tailored to young adults.

Insights from a Veterans Health Administration Database Analysis: Immune-Related Adverse Effects of Immunotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Introduction: Despite the high success rates in treating Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), a specific group of patients still experience relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease, affecting approximately 10-20% of cases. The use of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has emerged as a promising approach, demonstrating impressive efficacy in R/R cHL patients [2,3]. However, there is a lack of real-world evidence regarding the immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) associated with immunotherapy in this relatively rare patient population. To address this gap, this study leverages the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) database to investigate irAEs, providing valuable insights to optimize treatment decisions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on Hodgkin lymphoma patients who received immunotherapy from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse from 2014-2022. Patients came from all 18 Veterans Integrated Service Networks, spanning all 50 states and US territories. Data was collected to determine the baseline characteristics, disease factors, detailed AE occurrence as well as outcomes in this cohort. Results: The analysis included 68 cHL patients who received immunotherapy. The cohort had a mean age of 62.2 years (SD=15.9) and a median age of 66 years (IQR 54-72). The majority of the patients were male (97%) and White (80%) and only 6% of patients had a history of autoimmune disease. The distribution of patients across stages was as follows: Stage 1 (5%), Stage 2 (15%), Stage 3 (40%), and Stage 4 (40%). Additionally, 20% of patients underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), with 10% receiving immunotherapy before transplantation and the remaining 10% receiving it post-transplant. In our cohort, 31% had documented adverse effects related to immunotherapy. The most common adverse events observed were hematological/cytopenias (8%), dermatologic/rash (6%), endocrine-related (6%), pneumonitis (5%), hepatitis (2%), myocarditis (2%), and other adverse events (8%). Discontinuation of therapy due to irAEs occurred in 12% of patients. These findings align with prior literature, which has consistently reported thyroid gland dysfunction (such as hypothyroidism and thyroiditis) and rash as the most frequently observed immune-related adverse events [2]. The most common management of irAEs were holding therapy followed by use of corticosteroids. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a median overall survival of 55.4 months (IQR=37.2-59.2), with a median follow-up time of 36.4 months (IQR=21.6 -58.6). Conclusion: This study, utilizing the VA database, provides a distinctive and valuable perspective on irAEs associated with immunotherapy in cHL patients. By leveraging a comprehensive database on a large scale, this study significantly enhances our comprehension of immunotherapy in the context of cHL, thereby offering crucial guidance for treatment decisions concerning relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma patients. The findings of this study strongly indicate the sustained benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in this population, emphasizing the importance of close patient monitoring to detect and manage immune-related adverse events at an early stage, thereby preventing life-threatening complications.

ACS CARES: A digital approach to supporting health information and social needs among people with cancer and caregivers.

548 Background: ACS CARES (The American Cancer Society Community Access to Resources, Education, and Support) is the first nationwide non-clinical navigation program for people with cancer and caregivers. ACS CARES is a multi-channel approach providing direct, individualized, non-clinical assistance through a native app, telephonic or in-person support. Here we examine preliminary feasibility and acceptability of digital navigation through the ACS CARES app. Methods: The ACS CARES app became available for download on June 1, 2023. It includes sociodemographic and cancer-related questions, and a health information and social needs assessment adapted from the NCCN distress thermometer and problem list. Based on patient or caregiver responses, the app curates information and resources tailored to each user’s cancer journey and endorsed concerns. The aim is to deliver timely information to reduce distress, resources to mitigate social determinants of health, and emotional support to improve the cancer experience. Results: In the first three weeks, 349 people downloaded the app and 231 individuals (45% people with cancer, 55% caregivers) created profiles. Users represented 39 different cancer types across all stages, with 54% currently receiving treatment. Users are 75% white, 11% Hispanic, 63% female, with an average age of 55 (SD: 15). 11% of users are military/veteran, 15% rural, and from 43 states and US territories. The average initial distress screening was 4.0 on a scale of 0-10. Practical concerns were most frequently endorsed (n = 380, 36%). Cancer or health-related information was the most frequently endorsed practical concern with information on ‘Treatments, medications, procedures, and other therapies’ being the most common health information need. Fatigue, and worry, anxiety or fear were the most frequently endorsed physical and emotional concerns, respectively. Virtual support from someone with a similar cancer experience was the most commonly endorsed social concern. Users have accessed 357 health information or social needs resources in the app. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest feasibility and acceptability of using a native app to access information and resources for cancer support. ACS has targeted efforts planned to support diverse user engagement. Peer support within the app and in-person support at four pilot cancer centers will begin in September.

Barriers and facilitators to anal cancer screening among people living with HIV in Puerto Rico

BackgroundAnal cancer (AC) disproportionally affects people living with HIV (PLWH). Although there are no consensus-based AC screening guidelines, experts recommend anal pap as a primary screening tool in settings where high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) is available. We aimed to assess barriers and facilitators to anal cancer screening in a sample of Hispanic PLWH in Puerto Rico.MethodsTo assess their knowledge and attitudes, we conducted a cross-sectional survey from 2020–2021 among PLWH in Puerto Rico (n = 212). Data was collected through a telephone interview that assessed information on sociodemographics, knowledge, and attitudes about AC, and the history of AC screening. The chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with screening uptake.ResultsAnal Pap and HRA awareness were 60.4% and 30.7%, respectively. Anal Pap and HRA uptake was 51.5% and 19.3%, respectively. The most common barriers for anal Pap and HRA were lack of knowledge about the test and lack of physician recommendation. MSM were more likely to have heard of anal Pap (OR: 2.15, 95% CI:1.30–3.54) than MSW. MSM (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.79–5.19) and women (OR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.72–5.20) were also more likely to have undergone anal Pap. Similarly, individuals with a history of genital warts were more likely to have heard of anal Pap and HRA and have undergone anal Pap and HRA. Awareness of where to go for concerns about anal health was positively associated with having received anal Pap and HRA.ConclusionsWith emerging evidence on the effectiveness of screening and treatment for anal cancer, several organizations are steering toward generating consensus-based anal cancer screening recommendations. Our study provides foundational data on barriers and facilitators to anal cancer screening in Puerto Rico that will be critical to informing screening implementation in this US territory.

A Call to Increase Health Data Availability in US Territories—Not Too Small to Count

This Viewpoint discusses gaps in collection systems for health care data in US territories.

Staying Home, Tweeting Hope: Mixed Methods Study of Twitter Sentiment Geographical Index During US Stay-At-Home Orders.

Stay-at-home orders were one of the controversial interventions to curb the spread of COVID-19 in the United States. The stay-at-home orders, implemented in 51 states and territories between March 7 and June 30, 2020, impacted the lives of individuals and communities and accelerated the heavy usage of web-based social networking sites. Twitter sentiment analysis can provide valuable insight into public health emergency response measures and allow for better formulation and timing of future public health measures to be released in response to future public health emergencies. This study evaluated how stay-at-home orders affect Twitter sentiment in the United States. Furthermore, this study aimed to understand the feedback on stay-at-home orders from groups with different circumstances and backgrounds. In addition, we particularly focused on vulnerable groups, including older people groups with underlying medical conditions, small and medium enterprises, and low-income groups. We constructed a multiperiod difference-in-differences regression model based on the Twitter sentiment geographical index quantified from 7.4 billion geo-tagged tweets data to analyze the dynamics of sentiment feedback on stay-at-home orders across the United States. In addition, we used moderated effects analysis to assess differential feedback from vulnerable groups. We combed through the implementation of stay-at-home orders, Twitter sentiment geographical index, and the number of confirmed cases and deaths in 51 US states and territories. We identified trend changes in public sentiment before and after the stay-at-home orders. Regression results showed that stay-at-home orders generated a positive response, contributing to a recovery in Twitter sentiment. However, vulnerable groups faced greater shocks and hardships during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, economic and demographic characteristics had a significant moderating effect. This study showed a clear positive shift in public opinion about COVID-19, with this positive impact occurring primarily after stay-at-home orders. However, this positive sentiment is time-limited, with 14 days later allowing people to be more influenced by the status quo and trends, so feedback on the stay-at-home orders is no longer positively significant. In particular, negative sentiment is more likely to be generated in states with a large proportion of vulnerable groups, and the policy plays a limited role. The pandemic hit older people, those with underlying diseases, and small and medium enterprises directly but hurt states with cross-cutting economic situations and more complex demographics over time. Based on large-scale Twitter data, this sociological perspective allows us to monitor the evolution of public opinion more directly, assess the impact of social events on public opinion, and understand the heterogeneity in the face of pandemic shocks.

Assisted Reproductive Technology and Breech Delivery: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Singleton Pregnancies.

Since essential factors have changed in recent years in assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs), this study reassessed the association between ART and breech presentation. We primarily aimed to estimate the correlation between ART and breech at delivery. Secondary purposes were to evaluate the correlation between other subfertility treatments (OSTs) and breech and to assess possible confounding factors and temporal trends. This study investigated the 31,692,729 live birth certificates from US states and territories in the 2009-2020 period. The inclusion criteria were singleton births reporting the method of conception and the presentation at delivery. The outcome was the breech presentation at delivery, while the primary exposure was ART, the secondary exposure was OST, and the potential confounding factors from the literature were considered. ART (OR 2.32 CI.95 2.23-2.41) and OST (OR 1.79 CI.95 1.71-1.87) were independent and significant risk factors for breech at delivery (p < 0.001). This study confirmed breech presentation risk factors maternal age, nulliparity, tobacco smoke, a previous cesarean delivery (CD), neonatal female sex, gestational age, and birth weight. Black race and Hispanic origin were verified to be protective factors. We found breech prevalence among ART and OST to be stable during the study period. Meanwhile, newborn birth weight was increased, and the gap between breech and other presentations in ART was reduced. Our results indicate that singleton pregnancies conceived by ART or OST were associated with a higher risk of breech at delivery. Well-known risk factors for the breech presentation were also confirmed. Some of these factors can be modified by implementing interventions to reduce their prevalence (e.g., tobacco smoke and previous CD).

Do first responders trust connected and automated vehicles (CAVs)? A national survey

Connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) leverage emerging vehicle connectivity and automation technologies to enhance traffic safety. Extensive research has been done to examine the safety impacts of CAVs on road users (including vehicle occupants and vulnerable road users). Still, the impacts on first responders, who respond to traffic incidents and assist road users, are under-discussed. Road users show growing interest in CAVs, but it is uncertain whether first responders would feel the same way. First responders face the risk of being struck by passing vehicles when they perform their duties on road or roadside. In addition, it is unknown whether CAVs can or will do a better job than human drivers in conventional vehicles when passing an incident scene. This study conducted a national survey among first responders in the US to understand their knowledge and incident management experiences related to CAVs, as well as their attributes and concerns towards CAV technologies, including advanced driver assistance system (ADAS), connected vehicle (CV) and self-driving or autonomous vehicle (AV) technologies. Over 1000 first responders participated in the survey, and the survey had representation from all 50 states, Washington DC, and US Territories. The survey results showed that 82% of first responders have not received any CAV-related safety training, and 41% of first responders self-reported having little knowledge about CAVs. Regarding the roles of AVs in emergency responses, only a tiny portion (3%) of first responders would trust AVs more than human drivers passing an incident scene, and the majority (86%) of first responders do not think AVs will outperform human drivers. Only 1% of first responders said they trust AVs, and 44% stated that they do not trust AVs at all. A statistical model was developed to identify the correlates of first responders’ trust in AVs. Modeling results showed that education positively correlates to the likelihood of trusting AVs. This study found significant differences in perceptions towards CAVs across emergency response agencies and geographic regions. Law enforcement officers exhibit higher trust in AVs compared to firefighters; responders from DOT or public works are associated with the lowest levels of trust among all emergency response agencies. FEMA Region 3, which includes Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, shows the lowest levels of trust in AVs compared to human drivers among all regions in the country. This study provides valuable information for stakeholders to prepare responders for next-generation transportation emergency responses.

Disparities in African American oncology care in the US: A socioeconomic and geographic outlook.

e18590 Background: Mortality from cancer has been decreasing for all races and ethnicities. However, African Americans (AA) continue to have the highest mortality. Healthcare disparity contributes to poor outcomes. Here, we evaluate the differences in access to health care and socioeconomic status between different races and ethnicities in the US. Methods: We extracted data on demographic and healthcare coverage variables of patients diagnosed with cancer from the 2021 Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a national health-related telephone survey. We analyzed the effect of racial disparities in relation to socioeconomic factors and Census Bureau regions. R version 2.2.2 was used for all data extraction and analysis. Results: Out of 4,31,639 responders of BRFSS from the mainland US territory, 41,933 (9.71%) had been diagnosed with cancer other than skin cancer. Of these, 9,746 (9.74%) were from North East, 8,827 (9.11%) were from West, 10,806 (9.98%) were from South, and 12,554 (9.92%) were from Mid-West. In our sample, 35,137 (83.8%) were White, 2,356 (5.6%) were AA, 1,383 (3.3%) were Hispanic, and 3,047 (7.3%) were from others (Asian, American Indian/Alaskan Native, other race). More than 95% of oncology patients had health care coverage. However, the proportion of AA without healthcare coverage was higher than the White population (2.1% vs 1.2%, p &lt; 0.005). 5.3% of cancer patients did not see physicians due to cost. This percentage was significantly higher among AA compared to White (8.2% vs 4.3%, p &lt; 0.001). The rates of health care coverage and being unable to see a physician due to cost between AA and White were also statistically significant in each census region (not shown in table). Compared to White, AA patients with cancer were found to have statistically significantly lower education and income levels. This difference was present in all census regions of the US (not shown in table). Conclusions: Among cancer patients, AA are more likely not to have health care coverage, unable to see a physician due to cost, and have lower education and income level than White. These disparities impacting care of cancer patients exists in all major US regions, which likely promotes poor health outcomes. In addition, AA patients are underrepresented in this survey. [Table: see text]

Abstract 18: Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control in the Pacific: A Comprehensive Systems Based Approach in Yap State, Federated States of Micronesia

Abstract Purpose: The US Affiliated Pacific Islands, is composed of 3 US Territories (Guam, American Samoa, Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas) and 3 Sovereign Nations (Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), Republic of the Marshall Islands, Republic of Palau. The cervical cancer incidence in several of these island nations are amongst the highest globally. This project is designed to implement a sustainable comprehensive cervical cancer (CC) control program to eliminate CC in the island nations. Yap State, FSM an LMIC is a current project site. Planning, over 7 years, was through the Cancer Council of the Pacific Islands. Funding is primarily through a CDC Prevention and Control Capacity Building Grant, and other grant funds. To eliminate cervical cancer in Yap State, FSM through enhanced evidence based public health practices. The primary objective is to increase sustainable capacity to control cervical cancer. Methods: This non-research project is guided by the principles of community-based participatory development/engagement (CBPE), implementation science, transdisciplinary approach, and capacity building. The team is composed of 4 working cores, coordinated and led by an implementation core. The 4 cores are 1.) medical protocol and laboratory support 2.) community engagement and outreach 3.) data and informatics 4.) medical modeling and micro-costing. Capacity building through training and infrastructure development is a key component. Each core works synergistically and interfaces with the Yap Community Advisory Board, which has decision making authority. Results: Working towards cervical cancer control in a small island LMIC nation, with human resource and health infrastructure limitations, geographic challenges require flexibility and patience. The project processes involve multiple iterations, are culturally/geographically nuanced, and requires constant adjustment to national and international agency and medical regulatory bodies. Strong partnerships with health policy leaders, vaccination programs, clinicians is essential. Modelling projections to understand potential outcomes is necessary. Conclusions: Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control in Yap State, FSM an LMIC can be done with close and trusting community engagement that is participatory and capacity building. Building strong relationships with local, national, and international programs necessary. Citation Format: Neal Palafox, James Edilyong, Martina Reichhardt. Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control in the Pacific: A Comprehensive Systems Based Approach in Yap State, Federated States of Micronesia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Symposium on Global Cancer Research; Closing the Research-to-Implementation Gap; 2023 Apr 4-6. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 18.

CDC consultations related to ophthalmologic practices and settings, 2016–2021

Background: Healthcare activities that include instrumentation or manipulation of mucosal tissue or normally sterile sites, such as the eye and its associated structures, place patients at risk of infectious and other complications. We reviewed queries to the CDC Prevention and Response Branch that were focused on ophthalmologic procedures and settings to examine opportunities to improve infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in these settings. Methods: We reviewed internal CDC consultation records received from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2021, to identify those involving ophthalmologic procedures or settings. Consultations were reviewed to determine setting type, number of patients affected, organisms identified, nature of infection control breaches, and whether medical products were implicated. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: We identified 24 consultations among 19 states and US territories. Of these, 21 (87.5%) involved outpatient settings, of which 9 (43%) were ambulatory surgery centers. Consultations included the following non–mutually exclusive categories. There were 18 adverse postsurgical events (75%), such as mycobacterial infection after laser surgery and toxic anterior segment syndrome following cataract surgery (n = 5). There were 11 infections following ophthalmologic clinical care (46%), such as epidemic keratoconjunctivitis due to adenovirus 8. There were 8 suspected medication-related events (33%) including contamination of ophthalmic medication when manufactured or compounded offsite. There were 8 medical-device reprocessing concerns (33%) including inappropriate high-level disinfection. There were 8 instances of improper environmental cleaning and disinfection (33%), for example, during an adenovirus outbreak. There were 3 cases of potential mishandling of medications onsite (12.5%), such as multiuse eye drops. Also, 3 events (12.5%) were associated with potentially contaminated donor tissue, such as corneas for transplantation. When a consultation included identification of a pathogen (n = 11), organisms included bacteria (n = 7, 64%), viruses (n = 2, 18%), and fungi (n = 3, 27%). In total, 202 patients had confirmed ophthalmologic infections or adverse events. Conclusions: Based on our review of recent outbreaks, healthcare personnel in ophthalmologic settings may have deficits in training related to instrument reprocessing and environmental cleaning specific to ophthalmic equipment and settings that can result in harm to patients. These settings could benefit from targeted training to improve IPC practices specific to ophthalmologic examinations and procedures. This review was limited to analysis of investigations that were voluntarily reported to the CDC. A formal surveillance system for adverse outcomes in this setting could clarify the nature and frequency of IPC issues of greatest concern.Disclosures: None

A Research Agenda to Inform Cannabis Regulation: How Science Can Shape Policy

In the United States, changes to cannabis policy have outpaced scientific knowledge about cannabis, its effects, and the impacts of different policy approaches. Research barriers stem from key federal policies, including strict drug scheduling of cannabis, which comprehensively hinder the ability to conduct cannabis research, affecting state markets, evidence-based regulation, and scientific gains that could more effectively shape policy moving forward. The Cannabis Regulators Association (CANNRA) is a nonpartisan nonprofit organization that convenes and supports government agencies to facilitate information exchange and learning from existing cannabis regulations across US states and territories and other governmental jurisdictions. This commentary outlines a research agenda that, if implemented, would address critical gaps in the science that cannabis regulators have identified in terms of knowledge regarding: (1) medicinal use of cannabis; (2) cannabis product safety; (3) cannabis consumer behaviors; (4) policies to promote equity and reduce disparities, both in the industry and more broadly in communities affected by the past criminalization of cannabis; (5) policies to prevent youth consumption and promote public health and safety; and (6) policies to reduce the illicit market and associated harms. The research agenda outlined here is the result of both formal discussions through CANNRA-wide meetings and informal discussions cannabis regulators have had as part of CANNRA committees. This research agenda is not all encompassing but rather highlights areas of research that have vital importance for cannabis regulation and policy implementation. Although many organizations weigh in on research needs related to cannabis, cannabis regulators (ie, the individuals implementing policies legalizing cannabis in states and territories) have generally not had a voice at the table advocating for specific research to be conducted. Their perspective representing the government agencies closest to the ground in terms of experiencing the impacts of current cannabis policy is essential to furthering quality, practical research that can advance informed and effective policy.

Patients’ Perceived Level of Clinician Knowledge of Transgender Health Care, Self-rated Health, and Psychological Distress Among Transgender Adults

Transgender, gender nonbinary, and genderqueer people are at increased risk for negative health outcomes, and medical school education is currently lacking on inclusion of these topics. However, there is little evidence of an association of clinician knowledge with the health of transgender people. To evaluate the associations of patients' perceptions of clinician knowledge with self-rated health and severe psychological distress among transgender people. In this cross-sectional study, a secondary data analysis of the 2015 US Transgender Survey (a survey of transgender, gender nonbinary, and genderqueer adults conducted across 50 states) Washington, DC, US territories, and US military bases in 2015 was performed. Data were analyzed from February to November 2022. Patients' perception of their clinician's knowledge about transgender health care. Self-rated health, dichotomized as poor or fair vs excellent, very good, or good, and severe psychological distress (scoring a validated threshold of ≥13 on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale). The sample included a total of 27 715 respondents (9238 transgender women [33.3%; 55.1% weighted; 95% CI, 53.4%-56.7%], 22 658 non-Hispanic White individuals [81.8%; 65.6% weighted; 95% CI, 63.7%-67.5%], and 4085 individuals aged 45-64 years [14.7%; 33.8% weighted; 95% CI, 32.0%-35.5%]). Of 23 318 individuals who answered questions regarding their perceptions of their clinicians' level of knowledge, 5732 (24.6%) reported their clinician knows almost everything about transgender care, 4083 (17.5%) reported their clinician knows most things, 3446 (14.8%) reported their clinician knows some things, 2680 (11.5%) reported their clinician knows almost nothing, and 7337 (31.5%) reported they were unsure. Nearly 1 in 4 transgender adults (5612 of 23 557 individuals [23.8%]) reported having to teach their clinician about transgender people. In total, 3955 respondents (19.4%; 20.8% weighted; 95% CI, 19.2%-22.6%) reported fair or poor self-rated health and 7392 (36.9%; 28.4% weighted, 95% CI, 26.9%-30.1%) met the criteria for severe psychological distress. After adjusting for covariates, compared with individuals who reported their clinician knows almost everything about transgender care, exposure to clinicians with lower perceived levels of knowledge about transgender care was associated with significantly higher odds of fair or poor self-rated health (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for knowing almost nothing, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.76-3.94; aOR for unsure, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.28-2.56) and severe psychological distress (aOR for knowing almost nothing, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.61-3.37; aOR for unsure, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.05-1.79). Respondents who had to teach a clinician about transgender people had higher odds of reporting fair or poor self-rated health (aOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.31-2.13) and severe psychological distress (aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.21-1.83) compared with those who did not. The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that there is an association between perceived clinician knowledge about transgender people and self-rated health and psychological distress among transgender people. These results highlight the importance of integration and enhancement of transgender health in medical education curriculum as a necessary intervention to improve the health of transgender people.

Opportunities for Improved Dengue Control in the US Territories

This Viewpoint from the CDC discusses the prevalence of dengue infection in US territories and opportunities to combat it, such as vaccines and novel vector control methods.

Strategies to Operationalize Health Equity in Island Area Health Departments.

Strategies to Operationalize Health Equity in Island Area Health Departments.

Breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening test use in the US territories of Guam, Puerto Rico, and the US Virgin Islands

BackgroundThe United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among eligible adults, but information on screening use in the US territories is limited. MethodsTo estimate the proportion of adults up-to-date with breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening based on USPSTF recommendations, we analyzed Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 2016, 2018, and 2020 for the 50 US states and DC (US) and US territories of Guam and Puerto Rico and from 2016 for the US Virgin Islands. Age-standardized weighted proportions for up-to-date cancer screening were examined overall and by select characteristics for each jurisdiction. ResultsOverall, 67.2% (95% CI: 60.6–73.3) of women aged 50–74 years in the US Virgin Islands, 74.8% (70.9–78.3) in Guam, 83.4% (81.7–84.9) in Puerto Rico, and 78.3% (77.9–78.6) in the US were up-to-date with breast cancer screening. For cervical cancer screening, 71.1% (67.6–74.3) of women aged 21–65 years in Guam, 81.3% (74.6–86.5) in the US Virgin Islands, 83.0% (81.7–84.3) in Puerto Rico, and 84.5% (84.3–84.8) in the US were up-to-date. For colorectal cancer screening, 45.2% (40.0–50.5) of adults aged 50–75 years in the US Virgin Islands, 47.3% (43.6–51.0) in Guam, 61.2% (59.5–62.8) in Puerto Rico, and 69.0% (68.7–69.3) in the US were up-to-date. Adults without health care coverage reported low test use for all three cancers in all jurisdictions. In most jurisdictions, test use was lower among adults with less than a high school degree and an annual household income of < $25,000. ConclusionCancer screening test use varied between the US territories, highlighting the importance of understanding and addressing territory-specific barriers. Test use was lower among groups without health care coverage and with lower income and education levels, suggesting the need for targeted evidence-based interventions.

“They're just trying to survive”: The relationship between social vulnerability, informal housing, and environmental risks in Loíza, Puerto Rico, USA

Socially vulnerable households across the earth tend to live in informal settlements, which also are likely to be in areas that might experience flooding. Given that since the 1980s there have been more frequent and devastating hurricanes, this study asks what is the relationship between informal housing, social vulnerability, and environmental hazards in the context of a US territory? Although most research on this topic has concentrated in the Global South, there are no studies within the US disaster management system on these environmental justice topics—primarily because housing informality is heavily under studied in the US and the Global North. With the purpose of understanding the connection we conducted qualitative analysis using 30 interviews with stakeholders working on different facets of disaster recovery and mitigation in Loíza, Puerto Rico, a US territory. Loíza is a low-income Afro-Caribbean town along the coast, where about half of the homes are located within the 100-year FEMA flood maps. The findings suggest that changes need to be made regarding how local and federal government entities approach informal housing when providing assistance after the 2017 Hurricanes Irma and Maria. It is also important for planners and other decision makers to educate communities and provide recovery funding after a major disaster so that long-term risks could be reduce without displacing the local population.

Medium Roasting and Brewing Methods Differentially Modulate Global Metabolites, Lipids, Biogenic Amines, Minerals, and Antioxidant Capacity of Hawai'i-Grown Coffee (Coffea arabica).

In the United States, besides the US territory Puerto Rico, Hawai'i is the only state that grows commercial coffee. In Hawai'i, coffee is the second most valuable agricultural commodity. Health benefits associated with moderate coffee consumption, including its antioxidant capacity, have been correlated to its bioactive components. Post-harvest techniques, coffee variety, degree of roasting, and brewing methods significantly impact the metabolites, lipids, minerals, and/or antioxidant capacity of brewed coffees. The goal of our study was to understand the impact of roasting and brewing methods on metabolites, lipids, biogenic amines, minerals, and antioxidant capacity of two Hawai'i-grown coffee (Coffea arabica) varieties, "Kona Typica" and "Yellow Catuai". Our results indicated that both roasting and coffee variety significantly modulated several metabolites, lipids, and biogenic amines of the coffee brews. Furthermore, regardless of coffee variety, the antioxidant capacity of roasted coffee brews was higher in cold brews. Similarly, total minerals were higher in "Kona Typica" cold brews followed by "Yellow Catuai" cold brews. Hawai'i-grown coffees are considered "specialty coffees" since they are grown in unique volcanic soils and tropical microclimates with unique flavors. Our studies indicate that both Hawai'i-grown coffees contain several health-promoting components. However, future studies are warranted to compare Hawai'i-grown coffees with other popular brand coffees and their health benefits in vivo.

Racial/Ethnic and Geographic Disparities in Comorbid Traumatic Brain Injury-Renal Failure in US Veterans and Associated Veterans Affairs Resource Costs, 2000-2020.

Demographics by TBI and RF status were assessed. We estimated Cox proportional hazards models for progression to RF and generalized estimating equations for inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy cost annually and time since TBI + RF diagnosis, stratified by age. Among 596,189 veterans, veterans with TBI progressed faster to RF than those without TBI (HR 1.96). Non-Hispanic Black veterans (HR 1.41) and those in US territories (HR 1.71) progressed faster to RF relative to non-Hispanic Whites and those in urban mainland areas. Non-Hispanic Blacks (-$5,180), Hispanic/Latinos ($-4,984), and veterans in US territories (-$3,740) received fewer annual total VA resources. This was true for all Hispanic/Latinos, while only significant for non-Hispanic Black and US territory veterans < 65years. For veterans with TBI + RF, higher total resource costs only occurred ≥ 10years after TBI + RF diagnosis ($32,361), independent of age. Hispanic/Latino veterans ≥ 65years received $8,248 less than non-Hispanic Whites and veterans living in US territories < 65years received $37,514 less relative to urban veterans. Concerted efforts to address RF progression in veterans with TBI, especially in non-Hispanic Blacks and those in US territories, are needed. Importantly, culturally appropriate interventions to improve access to care for these groups should be a priority of the Department of Veterans Affairs priority for these groups.