Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent joint disease, characterized by synovial inflammation, cartilage destruction and subchondral bone sclerosis. Synovitis has been described to be an important process in OA progression, where several immune mediators, such as immunoregulatory neuropeptides, play an important role. The vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)/urocortins (UCNs) family are neuropeptides expressed in central and peripheral tissues, including immune cells, that modulate the expression of inflammatory and extracellular matrix remodelling mediators. VIP has previously shown a plethora of beneficial effects, both in inflammatory disorder animal models and in human OA, being a potential therapeutic agent. Besides, it has shown that high VIP levels are correlated with a decrease of the OA severity progress. In addition, CRF and Urocortin1 (UCN1) are secreted to the OA joint microenvironment exerting an autocrine and paracrine immuno/inflammatory regulation. Chondroitin sulfate (CS) is a Symptomatic Slow Action Drug for Osteoarthritis (SYSADOA) described to improve the symptoms of OA disease. The NIH-funded GAIT study demonstrated that CS is an effective drug in reducing OA patients’ synovitis. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of CS vs. paracetamol on synovitis in OA patients, and to evaluate their impact on VIP, CRF and UCN1 concentrations. Methods: 71 OA patients with synovitis (synovial hypertrophy+effusion≥4mm) were treated with CS (Condrosan®, CS Bio-ActiveTM, Bioibérica S.A., Barcelona, Spain) (800mg/day) or paracetamol (4g/day) for 6 months. Patients were followed-up until month 9 to evaluate the CS carry-over effect. In each visit (0, 6 and 9 months) synovitis was evaluated by sonography and plasma and synovial fluid were collected for the quantification of VIP, CRF and UCN1 by EIA (Enzyme Immunoassay). Once the clinical data have been collected, CS treated patients were subdivided into two groups, as responding and non-responding to treatment. A responding patient was defined by a sinovitis reduction at 6 months greater than 20% from basal value. Time-course analysis study was performed by a Wilcoxon two-related samples test. The comparation between responding and non-responding patients was analyzed by a Mann-Whitney U test. P values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The analysis of the results obtained showed that CS but not paracetamol reduces effectively the synovitis observed in OA patients. The improvement remained after 3 months treatment cessation. Synovial fluid presents a progressive decrease neuropeptides levels along the CS treatment, reaching significancy VIP reduction at 9 months. This tendency is more pronounced when only the responding patients are analyzed. In contrast no tendency was observed with the paracetamol group, showing a lonely significant decrease of UCN1 at 6 months. The neuropeptides levels in plasma did not show significant differences neither in the chondroitin treated patients nor in the responding group. However, the paracetamol grup present a progressive increment of CRF/UCN levels being significant the UCN1 increase at 9 months. When comparing the basal levels of the neuropeptides between responding and non-responding CS groups, we observed that patients with high level of neuropeptides before CS treatment, demonstrated a positive response to the treatment. Conclusions: These results indicate that CS but not paracetamol effectively reduces synovitis, even after leaving the CS treatment. This improvement lead to a decreased VIP level in synovial fluid, probably because of a fall of the mediators that regulates its expression. Neuropeptides levels could represent an important biomarker to distinguish which patients are responder to CS, since high level of them in synovial fluid at the onset of treatment are correlated with a positive response to CS treatment.