Rachel Wiebe Skouta, RN, NP, and Elsie Duff, NP, PhD(c) Bimanual examinations are not an effective assessment of gynecological health problems among asymptomatic well women. Annual bimanual exams do not increase the detection of adnexal masses, whether benign or malignant, and there is limited benefit in the use of these exams as part of regular screening for ovarian cysts or fibroids. There is also limited evidence to support the sensitivity and specificity of the pelvic exam; the effects of variables such as practitioner experience, client symptoms, client body shape, and client emotional experiences during the exam have not been well researched. As a result, the bimanual exam is not supported as a reproductive cancer screening tool. The purpose of this article is to address current guidelines and recommendations for routine health screening of well women. In symptomatic cases, pelvic ultrasounds and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) tests are effective screening tools to detect ovarian cancer. Pap tests every 3 years is a standard screening for cervical cancer. Because premenopausal women are more likely to develop benign ovarian follicular cysts, excessive screening in these women may simply increase anxiety, promote repetitive screening, and lead to unnecessary surgery for a condition that may resolve spontaneously. More effective testing methods are available for gynecological pathology screening. Advances in screening technology have made the pelvic exam irrelevant when assessing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). With improved technologies, such as nucleic-amplification tests, urine specimen collection, and vaginal selfswabs, bimanual exams have been rendered
Read full abstract