You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: New Technology/SWL, Ureteroscopic or Percutaneous Stone Removal III1 Apr 20121840 THE EFFECT OF COMBINED FUROSEMIDE AND INTRAVENOUS HYDRATION TO ESWL SUCCESS ON RENAL STONES Salim Küçükpolat, Akin Soner Amasyali, Ugur Yücetas, Erkan Erkan, Gökhan Toktas, and Erdinc Unlüer Salim KüçükpolatSalim Küçükpolat Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author , Akin Soner AmasyaliAkin Soner Amasyali Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author , Ugur YücetasUgur Yücetas Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author , Erkan ErkanErkan Erkan Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author , Gökhan ToktasGökhan Toktas Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author , and Erdinc UnlüerErdinc Unlüer Kars, Turkey More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.1928AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of diüresis during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment of renal calculi. METHODS From June 2009 - June 2010, 200 patients presenting with renal calculus were treated by ESWL (Siemens Modularis Vario Lithostar®) in Istanbul Teaching and Research Hospital enrolled the study. Shock waves were given at a rate of 90 shocks/minute with max. energy 5,5 KV. Patients were randomised into 2 groups. The first group was treated by standard ESWL and included 100 patients. The second group was treated with preoperative intravenous (IV) 20 mg furosemide administered 30 minutes before ESWL and hydration (1000 cc %0,9 NaCl) during procedure. Patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction, congenital renal anomaly, who have hydronephrosis more than grade 1 and age under 18 were excluded. Failure of disintegration was defined as no fragmentation of the stone after three sessions or residual fragments larger than 4 mm after last session. Three months after last ESWL session outcomes were compared. RESULTS Maximum stone length was between 6 – 20 mm. There were no statistical difference in terms of age, maximum stone length, maximum hounsfield unit (HU), mean HU, skin-to-stone distance, urine density and pH between study and control group (Table 1). Clearance rates were 69% and 71% for control and study group, respectively (p=0,758) (Figure 1). Complications rates were similar and wasn't statistically significant (9% vs 6%, p=0,421). Also no significant difference was observed according to mean number of ESWL sessions, shocks per stone and mean admitted energy. CONCLUSIONS Although concomittan diuretic and IV hydration during ESWL is safe, inexpensive and feasible, present study did not find any difference for stone clearance. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e744 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Salim Küçükpolat Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author Akin Soner Amasyali Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author Ugur Yücetas Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author Erkan Erkan Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author Gökhan Toktas Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author Erdinc Unlüer Kars, Turkey More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract